The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Scan Schedule

Forums General Melanoma Community Scan Schedule

  • Post
    JoshF
    Participant

      I have Pet/CT on Wednesday. I must have forgot it was a Pet. For those familiar with my story, after I had surgery in January to remove the recurrence or whatever was left after ipi and IL-2 they did a Pet which was clear followed by a CT in April that was clear. Just not sure why another Pet so soon. Of course I'll ask. Think I was too excited last time to even think about it and now some serious scanxiety is setting in. As usual trying to rationalize everything going on in my head.

      Josh

    Viewing 11 reply threads
    • Replies
        kimgibler
        Participant

          Best of luck to you.  I'm not sure why, but I think it's good to keep a close eye on things.  We're in Chicago too…at NW w/Dr Kuzel.  Will be thinking of you.

           

          kimgibler
          Participant

            Best of luck to you.  I'm not sure why, but I think it's good to keep a close eye on things.  We're in Chicago too…at NW w/Dr Kuzel.  Will be thinking of you.

             

            kimgibler
            Participant

              Best of luck to you.  I'm not sure why, but I think it's good to keep a close eye on things.  We're in Chicago too…at NW w/Dr Kuzel.  Will be thinking of you.

               

              ed williams
              Participant

                Hi Josh, this might sound a little bit funny but I kind of like having scans. I like knowing what is going on with the melanoma inside my old body, or maybe it is just because I have had so many scans being part of a clinical trial. It could be that I have just got used to them as part of the routine. I am not sure why they are going for the Pet/Ct again vs just a Ct. Maybe your oncology team find them more informative than the regular CT scan. Wishing you go scan results!!!! Ed

                ed williams
                Participant

                  Hi Josh, this might sound a little bit funny but I kind of like having scans. I like knowing what is going on with the melanoma inside my old body, or maybe it is just because I have had so many scans being part of a clinical trial. It could be that I have just got used to them as part of the routine. I am not sure why they are going for the Pet/Ct again vs just a Ct. Maybe your oncology team find them more informative than the regular CT scan. Wishing you go scan results!!!! Ed

                  ed williams
                  Participant

                    Hi Josh, this might sound a little bit funny but I kind of like having scans. I like knowing what is going on with the melanoma inside my old body, or maybe it is just because I have had so many scans being part of a clinical trial. It could be that I have just got used to them as part of the routine. I am not sure why they are going for the Pet/Ct again vs just a Ct. Maybe your oncology team find them more informative than the regular CT scan. Wishing you go scan results!!!! Ed

                    _Paul_
                    Participant

                      Hey Josh, I am right in line behind you, as I have a CT scheduled for Friday. This will be the first scan in about six months for me.

                      I hope you don't have to wait too long for your results, so that you don't have to endure too much more scanxiety.

                      I had a good conversation with my oncologist recently about PETs vs. CTs, and the plan we have come up with is to scan every 3 months alternating between PET and CT. I think the PET is better at finding new tumors and the vitality of existing ones, but the CT is better at resolving existing ones. Also, the PET has so much radiation (http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20100331/faq-radiation-risk-from-medical-imaging: "Getting a nuclear medicine study [sic: PET] exposes a patient to as much radiation as 10 to 2,050 chest X-rays") that it seems to make sense to limit them.

                      – Paul

                      _Paul_
                      Participant

                        Hey Josh, I am right in line behind you, as I have a CT scheduled for Friday. This will be the first scan in about six months for me.

                        I hope you don't have to wait too long for your results, so that you don't have to endure too much more scanxiety.

                        I had a good conversation with my oncologist recently about PETs vs. CTs, and the plan we have come up with is to scan every 3 months alternating between PET and CT. I think the PET is better at finding new tumors and the vitality of existing ones, but the CT is better at resolving existing ones. Also, the PET has so much radiation (http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20100331/faq-radiation-risk-from-medical-imaging: "Getting a nuclear medicine study [sic: PET] exposes a patient to as much radiation as 10 to 2,050 chest X-rays") that it seems to make sense to limit them.

                        – Paul

                        _Paul_
                        Participant

                          Hey Josh, I am right in line behind you, as I have a CT scheduled for Friday. This will be the first scan in about six months for me.

                          I hope you don't have to wait too long for your results, so that you don't have to endure too much more scanxiety.

                          I had a good conversation with my oncologist recently about PETs vs. CTs, and the plan we have come up with is to scan every 3 months alternating between PET and CT. I think the PET is better at finding new tumors and the vitality of existing ones, but the CT is better at resolving existing ones. Also, the PET has so much radiation (http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20100331/faq-radiation-risk-from-medical-imaging: "Getting a nuclear medicine study [sic: PET] exposes a patient to as much radiation as 10 to 2,050 chest X-rays") that it seems to make sense to limit them.

                          – Paul

                          arthurjedi007
                          Participant

                            Hope your scan went well and you get the results you are wanting.

                            Artie

                            arthurjedi007
                            Participant

                              Hope your scan went well and you get the results you are wanting.

                              Artie

                              arthurjedi007
                              Participant

                                Hope your scan went well and you get the results you are wanting.

                                Artie

                            Viewing 11 reply threads
                            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                            About the MRF Patient Forum

                            The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                            The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.