The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Questions about biopsy results and mole regrowth

Forums General Melanoma Community Questions about biopsy results and mole regrowth

  • Post
    Tessie64
    Participant

      I had a small mole (6 mm) removed from a toe by punch biopsy three weeks ago. Pathology came back as lentiginous junctional melanocytic proliferation with mild to moderate atypia. I was told that I need to have a complete excision done; appointment is in a month from now.

      The area is still very sore. When I look closely, there seems to be mole left around the punch incision. Could this be new growth already, or do they only take a small  specimen of mole for testing? If it is regrowth, should I call doctor for sooner appointment? I wanted to say above that this a fairly new mole (started as tiny dot about 4 years ago) that has been growing.

      Waiting is hard. Should I be concerned that after the excision, the pathology could come back as melanoma, or would they have told me that the first time?

      thanks

    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Replies
        Janner
        Participant

          It's possible they did not remove the entire mole, you'd have to see the pathology report.  Sometime the bruising can look a lot like a mole, too, so it may be that.  I don't think you have to worry about the extra margins – extremely unlikely for the pathology to change even if it is the mole growing back.  I will say that pathology often looks worse when it is in scar tissue so it is a bit harder for the pathologists to read, but I definitely would not be losing any sleep over the diagnosis on this one.

          Janner
          Participant

            It's possible they did not remove the entire mole, you'd have to see the pathology report.  Sometime the bruising can look a lot like a mole, too, so it may be that.  I don't think you have to worry about the extra margins – extremely unlikely for the pathology to change even if it is the mole growing back.  I will say that pathology often looks worse when it is in scar tissue so it is a bit harder for the pathologists to read, but I definitely would not be losing any sleep over the diagnosis on this one.

            Janner
            Participant

              It's possible they did not remove the entire mole, you'd have to see the pathology report.  Sometime the bruising can look a lot like a mole, too, so it may be that.  I don't think you have to worry about the extra margins – extremely unlikely for the pathology to change even if it is the mole growing back.  I will say that pathology often looks worse when it is in scar tissue so it is a bit harder for the pathologists to read, but I definitely would not be losing any sleep over the diagnosis on this one.

          Viewing 2 reply threads
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
          About the MRF Patient Forum

          The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

          The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

          Popular Topics