The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Would you request a second WLE?

Forums Cutaneous Melanoma Community Would you request a second WLE?

  • Post
    Miss_yqm
    Participant
      I am new here. I had a suspiscious looking mole on my left calf checked out by several general physicians and nurses who all thought it was nothing.

      I got a new family doctor and insisted on getting a referral for a dermatologist. My dermatologist recommeded a biopsy, but she was convinced it was nothing and did it so I would have peace of mind (I’m a hypohondriac). My biopsy took place on March 31st, and I was notified on May 1st that it had come back for melanoma in situ. I had my WLE done a week later with 5mm margins, which I had told her she can cut up as much as she wants to make sure this thing was out!! I requested my path reports after, and my biopsy path report said it was “at least melanoma in situ, with features suspicious of early papillary dermal invasion (Breslow thickness 0.28mm, Clark II).” Huh. Ok. Clark II means stage 1a not in situ… I then reviewed my WLE path report which says “The previous biopsy was reviewed, rare cells suspicious for papillary dermis invasion were confirmed, similar cells are not seen in the current wide excision specimen. Opinion: Focal residual melanoma in situ, negative for dermal invasion in this sample; in situ melanoma is 4 milimeters from closest lateral margin.”

      So turns out I am stage 1a, not 0 as my dermatologist initially thought.

      My dermatologist called 6 weeks post WLE to prescribe me Zyclara (imiquimod) two applications per day for 6 consecutive weeks in case there were any melanoma cells left, she said this would kill them. She has dismissed any concerns I had when I questioned the effectiveness of Zyclara on melanoma. When she did my skin check, she glanced at moles from afar and dismissed my concerns for a similar one on my back. I feel very anxious and scared.

      A new dermatologist has reluctantly accepted me as a patient, and although she agrees the guideline margins for stage 1a are not met, she does not feel comfortable re excising it herself and would like me to go to my old dermatologist who I think will refuse to do it. Zyclara has had no effect on my skin/scar, which my old dermatologist said is good because since there is no reaction that means there is likely no cancer cells left.

      What would you do? I worry a lot, and tend to come to these forums often. I want to move on and live my life but am terrified I will be part of the 5% 1a who die after 5 years if I don’t get re-excised.

      Thanks to all for reading.

    Viewing 0 reply threads
    • Replies
        stars
        Participant

          What an unpleasant situation. It seems to me that the final bottom line opinion is in situ, as per the 'Opinion' stated, so you are probably fine with the 0.5mm excision. That said, I would be more comfortable with 1cm… like you, I tend to be conservative/cautious in these things. Have both derms refused, or just the second/new derm? Is it worth asking the first derm (as in, telling). you want a 1cm excision because of 'grey area' between in situ and 1a and wanting to be cautious? I can kind of understand the 2nd derm not wanting to get involved in the work of the 1st derm… ideally, the 1st derm would 'finish the job' then transfer your care to 2nd derm.

            Miss_yqm
            Participant
              Thanks for your comment, I really appreciate it. I am trying my best not to worry and be optimistic, considering I am at worst stage 1a. Is it possible to have melanoma in situ with a Breslow depth of 0.28mm? I am confused why my path report would mention Clark II (invasion of dermis, clearly not in situ if that is the case) but not stage me as melanoma 1a. I am just trying to make sense of all this. I called the lab, the secretary told me to speak with my derm who could offer clarification. It’s still murky.
        Viewing 0 reply threads
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
        About the MRF Patient Forum

        The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

        The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

        Popular Topics