The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Rose Bengal for Melanoma

Forums Cutaneous Melanoma Community Rose Bengal for Melanoma

  • Post
    boot2aboot
    Participant

      http://www.wsoctv.com/health/28562414/detail.html

       

       

      http://www.wsoctv.com/health/28562414/detail.html

       

       

      Rose Bengal For Melanoma

      Melanoma

       

      Melanoma is a form of skin cancer that develops in the pigmenting skin cells, called melanocytes. The Skin Cancer Foundation estimates that last year, about 120,000 new cases of melanoma would be diagnosed in the U.S. Roughly 68,130 cases would be invasive melanoma. It’s the most common form of cancer among those 25 to 29.

       

      Although melanoma accounts for only about five percent of all skin cancers, it’s the cause of about 75 percent of skin cancer deaths. Last year, 8,700 people in the U.S. were expected to die from melanoma. The reason for the poor survival rate is that many cases are diagnosed after the cancer has invaded to deep tissues and/or spread to distant areas of the body. For melanoma that has spread regionally, five year survival rates are only about 62 percent. Once the cancer reaches distant areas of the body, five-year survival rates drop to about 15 percent.

       

      Treating the Cancer

       

      The mainstay of treatment for melanoma is surgical removal of the tumor. Doctors may try to remove the tumor by taking one layer of tissue at a time, checking each slice to see if any cancer cells remain. However, even seemingly small melanomas can grow deeply and leave behind a large hole once they are removed. Depending on the location and spread of the cancer, surgeons may remove the nearby lymph nodes as well.

       

      If the melanoma spreads, it can be very difficult to treat. It’s impossible to detect and remove all distant melanoma cells. Chemotherapy (anti-cancer medications) may be tried. Other options may include immunotherapy or radiation therapy.

       

      Rose Bengal for Advanced Disease

       

      Sanjiv Agarwala, M.D., Oncologist at St. Luke’s Hospital in Bethlehem, PA says treatment for stage 3 melanoma is very limited. Surgery doesn’t often work because the cancer comes back. Even though the cancer is still somewhat localized, radiation therapy has limited effectiveness. Thus, patients don’t really have any good treatment options.

       

      Agarwala and a few colleagues across the world are testing a new treatment for advanced melanoma, called PV-10 (Rose Bengal). PV-10 is a rose-colored stain used more than 100 years ago to dye wool. Doctors found the stain could be used in diagnostic tests to detect eye abrasions and to assess liver function. Researchers also discovered the stain may be taken up by cancer cells. Inside a cancer cell, the drug accumulates in specialized structures, called lysosomes, often causing the cell to die. Surrounding healthy cells are unaffected because they don’t take up the PV-10.

       

      PV-10 is injected directly into a melanoma tumor. Agarwala says that the injection can be very painful for some people, so an anesthetic agent is given prior to the treatment. Following the injection, the tumor turns red. Agarwala explains that response is simply the result of the tumor cells taking up the red stain and the color has no direct effect on the treatment. Over the next few days, as the cancer cells die, the tumor dries up, scabs and falls off. It can take two to three weeks to see the final effects of the treatment.

       

      Not all melanomas respond to PV-10. In a phase II study, researchers found 60 percent of participants had at least a 30 percent shrinkage of their tumor. However, researchers saw another, very surprising effect of the treatment. About one-third of patients who responded to the injection also had shrinkage of nearby and distant melanoma tumors that were NOT injected. The reason for the so-called "bystander effect" isn’t known. However, Agarwala theorizes that when the target tumor dies, the cancer cells release proteins that the immune system learns to recognize, improving the body’s ability to attack other melanomas.

       

      Agarwala says the PV-10 is best for patients who have advanced, but localized disease with external tumors. It would not be used for those with a significant number of internal tumors.

       

      Researchers are designing a phase III trial to further study the effects and benefits of PV-10 for melanoma. Though the drug is not yet approved in the U.S., it is available to melanoma patients who have no other treatment options through a compassionate use program. For more information go to clinicaltrials.gov, and then type the trial identification number in the search box: NCT01260779

       

      Research compiled and edited by Barbara J. Fister

       

      AUDIENCE INQUIRY

       

      For information about PV-10’s expanded access for compassionate use, go to clinicaltrials.gov, and then type the trial identification number in the search box: NCT01260779.

       

      For general information on PV-10, go to the company’s website at pvct.com

       

      For information about melanoma:

       

      American Academy of Dermatology, http://www.aad.org

       

      American Cancer Society, http://www.cancer.org

       

      National Cancer Institute, http://www.cancer.gov

       

      Skin Cancer Foundation, http://www.aad.org/for-the-public/home

    Viewing 5 reply threads
    • Replies
        Janner
        Participant

          "Sharyn" from Newfoundland tried this.  If you look for posts by her or search for PV-10, you'll see it has been done by others, too.

          Best wishes,

          Janner

          Janner
          Participant

            "Sharyn" from Newfoundland tried this.  If you look for posts by her or search for PV-10, you'll see it has been done by others, too.

            Best wishes,

            Janner

            ValinMtl
            Participant

              Yes, when I told Sharyn about my sub-qs in January, she suggested I might want to try this because it did significantly reduce a number of her sub-qs (very painful though) …unfortunately, it would not solve systemic problems.  I felt I did not want to go through too much pain for no longer lasting effects.  Val

              ValinMtl
              Participant

                Yes, when I told Sharyn about my sub-qs in January, she suggested I might want to try this because it did significantly reduce a number of her sub-qs (very painful though) …unfortunately, it would not solve systemic problems.  I felt I did not want to go through too much pain for no longer lasting effects.  Val

                MichaelFL
                Participant

                  Yes, Sharyn did try this in 2008-09. Sadly she is no longer with us.

                  Keep in mind that this is only for tumors that are large enough to be injected. (see below) It does not work for systemic disease.

                  Here is some more reading:

                  The expanded access trial they are talking about: (it is open)

                  http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01260779?term=NCT01260779&rank=1

                  Here is the Phase I trial: Subjects in the trial must have at least two measurable melanoma lesions. (completed, not recruiting)

                  http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00219843?term=PV-10+Metastatic+Melanoma&rank=2

                  Phase II Trial: (not recruiting) Subjects with at least one melanoma lesion = 0.2 cm in diameter that can be accurately measured by ruler/caliper or ultrasound will receive intralesional injection of PV-10 into each of up to twenty (20) Study Lesions. Additionally, one to two measurable Bystander Lesions may remain untreated and will be followed for assessment of bystander response. 

                  http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00521053?term=PV-10+Metastatic+Melanoma&rank=1

                  And from medical news today:

                  PV-10 Treatment For Metastatic Melanoma Well-Tolerated By Patients – Evidence Of "Bystander Effect" Observed In Phase 1 Trial

                   

                  http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/124287.php

                  Michael

                  MichaelFL
                  Participant

                    Yes, Sharyn did try this in 2008-09. Sadly she is no longer with us.

                    Keep in mind that this is only for tumors that are large enough to be injected. (see below) It does not work for systemic disease.

                    Here is some more reading:

                    The expanded access trial they are talking about: (it is open)

                    http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01260779?term=NCT01260779&rank=1

                    Here is the Phase I trial: Subjects in the trial must have at least two measurable melanoma lesions. (completed, not recruiting)

                    http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00219843?term=PV-10+Metastatic+Melanoma&rank=2

                    Phase II Trial: (not recruiting) Subjects with at least one melanoma lesion = 0.2 cm in diameter that can be accurately measured by ruler/caliper or ultrasound will receive intralesional injection of PV-10 into each of up to twenty (20) Study Lesions. Additionally, one to two measurable Bystander Lesions may remain untreated and will be followed for assessment of bystander response. 

                    http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00521053?term=PV-10+Metastatic+Melanoma&rank=1

                    And from medical news today:

                    PV-10 Treatment For Metastatic Melanoma Well-Tolerated By Patients – Evidence Of "Bystander Effect" Observed In Phase 1 Trial

                     

                    http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/124287.php

                    Michael

                Viewing 5 reply threads
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                About the MRF Patient Forum

                The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                Popular Topics