The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

keep getting postive margin after 3 wide excisions last 2 months

Forums General Melanoma Community keep getting postive margin after 3 wide excisions last 2 months

  • Post
    Shimian
    Participant

      My father had 3 wide excisions last 2 months. The pathology reports after each excision continued to show Melanoma in situ cells on the margin despite the surgeon expanded the excision areas from standard 5mm to 1cm margin and removed all visible spots.

      My father had 3 wide excisions last 2 months. The pathology reports after each excision continued to show Melanoma in situ cells on the margin despite the surgeon expanded the excision areas from standard 5mm to 1cm margin and removed all visible spots.

      My father had surgery to remove a deep 4mm primary on his heel 2 years ago. A few little dark spots covering much wider areas than his primary showed up on his heel again early summer this year. Though all the recent biopsy reports showed Melonoma in Situ (which is much less severe than the primary), it seems very challenging for the surgeon to define the surgery border,

      We wonder if we need to continue to expand the excision areas until clean margin. My dad has suffered both physically and mentally a lot last 2 months.

      Anyone has similar experience with keep getting postive margins? Do Melanoma in situ cells pop up everywhere before they become visible?

       

    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Replies
        FormerCaregiver
        Participant

          I have just had a look at your profile, but couldn't find any info about your father's melanoma history. Although you mention that the biopsy reports showed melanoma in situ, I always think that it is wise to be cautious. Therefore, has your father had whole body PET and/or CT scan within the last few months? If so, what did the results show?

          Best wishes

          Frank from Australia

          FormerCaregiver
          Participant

            I have just had a look at your profile, but couldn't find any info about your father's melanoma history. Although you mention that the biopsy reports showed melanoma in situ, I always think that it is wise to be cautious. Therefore, has your father had whole body PET and/or CT scan within the last few months? If so, what did the results show?

            Best wishes

            Frank from Australia

              JerryfromFauq
              Participant

                Frank, her father is, I believe either stge 1 or 2 with C-kit (exon 11) acrual lentiginous melanoma.  The lst i knew no SLN had bee performed so the posibility of stage II is unknown.  So far The c-kit drugs hav not been prescribed for lees that stage III unresctable or stage IV.  This is one of those cases where one would  love to see what something like Gleevec would do to prevent the continuing couse of events.

                   Shimian, 2 questions: 1.  Is your father still overseas or is he with you now?

                     2. Is there any chance that you could get your Oncologist to run his own special gleevec trial to see if it would help? If still overseas would the system over there provide the targeted therapy?

                   Another option would be one of the cremes that have helped melanoma cases for surface melanomas.

                            http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,1513,0.htm

                             http://dermatology.cdlib.org/101/reviews/imiquimod/navi.html

                             http://www.healthcentral.com/skin-cancer/skin-cancer-treatment-30420-49.html

                  Sounds like this could be a rough treatment.(iniquimod, Alt

                Abstract

                Imiquimod is a novel synthetic compound that is a member of the imidazoquinolone family of drugs. This class of drugs, which also includes a more potent member, resimiquimod (R-848), is unique having the properties of topical immune response modifiers and stimulators. Imiquimod resembles a nucleoside analogue and is known for its potent induction of endogenous antiviral pro-inflammatory mediators. This article is a review of the relevant literature as it relates to the off-label applications of imiquimod 5 percent cream for treatment of cutaneous preneoplastic and neoplastic conditions including its recently approved indication for treating actinic keratoses.


                Introduction

                Figure 1

                Imiquimod is a novel synthetic compound that is a member of the imidazoquinolone family of drugs. This class of drugs, which also includes a more potent member, resimiquimod (R-848), is unique having the properties of topical immune response modifiers and stimulators. Imiquimod resembles a nucleoside analogue (fig.1) and is known for its potent induction of endogenous antiviral pro-inflammatory mediators [1]. Following publication of several prospective studies showing that topical application of imiquimod is a safe and effective treatment for external anogenital and perianal warts, in 1997 the Food and Drug Administration approved its licensure for these manifestations of human papilloma virus infection [2]. In 2004 imiquimod 5 percent received FDA approval for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). As of this writing it is still marketed in the United States as a 5 percent cream (Aldara™, 3M Pharmaceuticals) for its two FDA approved usages. In recent years the off-label use of imiquimod 5 percent cream in dermatological practice, however, has shown this unique drug to be efficacious in a many dermatological conditions. This article is a review of the relevant literature as it relates to the off-label applications of imiquimod 5 percent cream for treatment of cutaneous preneoplastic and neoplastic conditions including its recently approved indication for treating AK.

                Mechanism of action

                Both in vivo and in vitro studies point to the role of imiquimod as an immune modulator via its binding to the Toll receptor 7 (TLR-7) present on dendritic cells, macrophages, and monocytes [1]. Subsequent activation of these cells leads to release of pro-inflammatory mediators IFN-α, TNF-α, IL-1, IL-12, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10, among others. These cytokines are believed to then drive the activation of the adaptive immune response toward the TH-1 or cell-mediated pathway and inhibit the TH-2 pathway. This modulation of the immune response, along with creation of an antiviral state including upregulation of NK-cell activity via induction of 2'5'oligoadenylate synthetase, is thought to be important for control of viruses and tumors [3]. Additionally, topical application of imiquimod has been shown to enhance the functional maturation and migration of Langerhan cells to regional lymph nodes, thus enhancing antigen presentation to naïve T cells and inducing a more specific immune response [1]. Recent findings shed some light on a possible direct action of imiquimod on basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The addition of imiquimod resulted in the induction of Fas receptors on tumor cells, and is postulated to lead to their subsequent apoptosis via binding of FasR to the Fas ligand, induction by neighboring BCC cells, and infiltration of lymphocytes. Berman et al. demonstrated that BCC cells in 3 of 4 patients treated with imiquimod for a 2-week period were positive for FasR, while all 5 vehicle-treated patients had FasR negative BCC cells at the end of the treatment period [4]. A number of other studies also provide evidence for direct antineoplastic activity of imiquimod via induction of apoptosis in tumor cells, which normally have mechanisms that resist apoptosis. In one study tumor-specific apoptosis induced by imiquimod was demonstrated both in SCC cell lines as measured by a number of apoptotic signals (Bcl-2, capsases, etc.) and in BCC tumors in vivo [5].

                Nature of published studies

                The nature of the published studies on the off-label applications of imiquimod range from anecdotal case reports to phase III clinical trials. Because of its action inducing an inflammatory response favoring the apoptosis of tumor cells (i.e., the activation of TH-1 pathway, stimulation of NK cells and killer T cells, and maturation of dermal antigen presenting cells) it is not surprising that the majority of the published studies examine the efficacy of imiquimod 5 percent cream in treating cutaneous oncological lesions. Table 1 summarizes the current stage of research on off-label applications of topical imiquimod cream for such lesions.

                Table 1. Current stage of investigational study of Imiquimod efficacy
                Cutaneous Lesion Stage of Study
                Actinic Keratosis Phase III Clinical Trial
                Superficial and Nodular BCC Phase III Clinical Trial
                Sclerodermiform BCC Case Report
                Bowen's Disease/SCC in Situ Phase II Clinical Trial
                Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma Case Report
                Lentigo Maligna Case Report
                Metastatic Melanoma Case Report
                Mycosis Fungoides Case Report
                Keratoacanthoma Case Report
                Extramammary Paget's Disease Case Report

                Published findings

                Actinic keratosis

                Promising results of Phase II studies on actinic keratosis have been recently reported. One such study examined the efficacy of imiquimod for lesions on scalp, forehead, dorsal forearm, neck, and dorsal hand. The 5 percent cream was applied up to three-times per week for 12 weeks, although rest periods were allowed for subjects with troublesome local reactions. Of the treatment group, 84 percent experienced complete clinical and histological clearance of actinic keratoses, and 8 % had partial clearance. Recurrence after 1 year of treatment was seen in 10 % of patients [6]. In a similar study imiquimod was applied to lesion sites for 6-8 weeks depending on the severity of the application site reactions. All six patients in this study demonstrated histological clearing with no apparent signs of persisting lesions. No recurrences were observed during the 2-12 month followup period [7].

                Salasche et al. performed an open-label study on the treatment of AKs and proposed a regimen of cycled therapy [8]. They used a rigid 4-week active intervention phase followed by a 4-week imposed rest period. During the treatment phase, imiquimod was applied once daily, 3 times a week. At the end of the 4-week rest phase, the treatment phase was repeated if any AKs were still present. They used up to three treatment phases. They concluded that their cycled approach of alternating 4 weeks of active therapy with 4 weeks of rest was able to achieve high efficacy while minimizing adverse effects.

                Superficial basal cell carcinoma

                The first dose-response study on the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma with imiquimod 5 percent cream was published in 1999. There were 35 patients randomized to several dosing regimens of imiquimod or a vehicle cream for a maximum treatment period of 16 weeks or 2 weeks following clinical clearance of lesions. Rest periods of up to 7 days were allowed for patients with severe localized reactions. Superficial BCC lesions cleared (on the basis of histological examination) in all patients (100 %) dosed twice a day, once a day, and three-times a week. Clearance was seen in 60 % of patients dosed twice weekly, 50 % of patients dosed once weekly, and 9 % of patients treated with vehicle. The median duration of treatment was 10 weeks for the twice-daily group, 13 weeks for once-daily group, and 14.5 weeks for three-times-weekly group [9].

                Similar results were observed in later study encompassing a multicenter 6-week dose-response trial of 99 patients. Complete histological clearance was seen in 100 % (3/3) of patients in twice-daily regimen, 87.9 % (29/33) of patients in the once-daily regimen, 73.3 % (22/30) of patients in twice-daily three-times-per-week regimen, and 69.7 % (23/33) of patients in the once-daily, three-times-per-week regimen. The median duration of treatment for complete clearance was 10-16 weeks [10].

                A larger Phase II study published in 2002 also assessed the efficacy of various dosing regimens on clearance of superficial BCC lesions. Patients were randomized to a 12-week treatment of lesions with imiquimod in one of four dosing groups. Histological examination of lesions 6-weeks post-treatment revealed complete response rates in 100 % (10/10), 87.1 % (27/31), 80.8 % (21/26), and 51.7 % (15/29) for patients in the twice-daily, once-daily, five-times-a-week, and three-times-a-week imiquimod groups, respectively, and 18.8 % (6/32) in the vehicle group. The authors conclude that daily or five-times-a-week dosing for 12 weeks is highly efficacious and has acceptable safety profiles [11]. To assess the effect of occlusion on response rates at low dosing frequencies a multicenter clinical trial published in 2002 randomized patients to one of 4 treatment arms: imiquimod application 2 or 3 days per week either with or without occlusion. The highest histological complete response rate of 87 % was seen in the 3-days-per-week with occlusion groups, but occlusion did not have a statistically significant effect on response rate at either dosing frequency. The response rate in 3-days-per-week groups, however, was significantly higher than the 2-days-per-week groups, which had response rates of 43 % and 50 % for patients with and without occlusion, respectively [12].

                Nodular basal cell carcinoma

                The occlusion study discussed above also included patients with nodular BCC lesions. In this group of patients the 3-days-per-week regimen with occlusion resulted in a complete histological clearance rate of 65 % versus 50 % in the no-occlusion group, a statistically insignificant finding. Furthermore, these response rates were not statistically different from those attained from the 2-days-per-week groups [12]. The lower overall efficacy of imiquimod 5 percent cream for the treatment of nodular BCC versus superficial BCC seen in this study has also been demonstrated in other studies. One such study was a Phase II clinical trial comparing efficacy of various dosing regimens in a 6-week study in Australia and New Zealand and a 12-week study in United States. In both studies histological examination of lesion site 6-weeks post-treatment showed the highest clearance rate in the once-daily-for-7-days-per-week groups, with 71 percent of patients in the 6-week study and 76 percent of patients in the 12-week study having complete response following treatment. As the authors point out these response rates were lower than the nearly 88 percent response rates seen in studies of superficial BCC lesions [13].

                Sclerodermiform BCC

                One case report demonstrating success in the treatment of a sclerodermiform BCC lesion on the right temple was found in the literature. Following 3-times-weekly application for 16 weeks, a histological examination of the lesion site showed only scar tissue. No recurrences were seen 9 months after completion of treatment [14].

                Table 2. Summary of findings regarding efficacy topical imiquimod for treatment of subtypes of basal cell carcinoma.
                BCC subtype Treatment duration Dosing regimen Percent complete histological clearance
                Superficial BCC 10-14.5 Weeks 2 × a day 100 %
                once a day 87.1-100 %
                3 × a week 51.7-100 %
                Nodular BCC 6-12 Weeks 3 × a week 50-65 %
                once a day 71-76 %
                Sclerodermiform BCC 16 weeks 3 × a week 100 %

                Squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen's disease)

                A number of studies have addressed the efficacy of imiquimod 5 percent cream in the treatment of Bowen's disease (i.e., SCC in situ). One of the larger ones was a Phase II, open-label study of sixteen patients with single lesions located on their legs (15 patients) and shoulder (1 patient). This 2001 study assessed histological clearance of the lesions 6 weeks following a 16-week treatment regimen of once-daily application of imiquimod 5 percent cream. Although only ten patients completed 16 weeks of treatment (others self treated for 4-8 weeks), 93 percent (14 of 15) showed complete clearance in post-treatment biopsy specimens. Furthermore the treatment site was tumor free in the 6-month followup visit in all thirteen patients who attended the followup [15]. Such long-term recurrence-free resolution of Bowenoid lesions treated with imiquimod have been observed in a number of case reports. One such case report is of a patient with a nose lesion who had no histological sign of recurrence 12 months following a 9-week treatment with imiqimod [16]. Another study reported the case of a patient with SCC in situ of the penis who was treated with imiquimod once daily for a total of 24 days with a 1-month rest period after the first 11 days. The lesion was histologically resolved, and the patient was tumor free 18 months following treatment [17].

                Invasive squamous cell carcinoma

                We found one study in the literature supporting the efficacious role of imiquimod 5 percent for treatment of invasive SCC [14]. The two patients were immunosuppressed renal transplant patients, one with the lesion on the temple and the other on the sternum. The patient with temple lesion was treated three times a week for 12 weeks and showed scarring in a biopsy obtained at week 16 and no evidence of residual tumor at a six-month followup. A patient with SCC on sternum was treated three times a week for 5 weeks followed by twice a week for 7 weeks because of uncomfortable local reaction. This patient had complete clearance at week 12 and was tumor free at an 8-month followup.

                Lentigo maligna

                The first reported case on the therapeutic use of imiquimod 5 percent for lentigo maligna (LM) was in 2000 by Ahmed and Berth-Jones [18]. The patient was an elderly man reluctant to have surgery who was therefore treated with topical imiquimod. Total treatment period was 7 months with frequent rest periods allowed for localized reactions to subside. There was complete histological and clinical clearance at follow-up and no evidence of recurrence at 9 months. Other case reports have shown similar successes with LM lesions. One such case report involves a patient with recurrent LM who was initially treated with CO2 laser [19]. Imiquimod application once or twice a day for 3 months resulted in no apparent residual LM on two punch biopsies. Because a complete excision was not done and long-term efficacy is unknown, the authors recommended that their patient continue treatment of the primary site for 12 months. The efficacy of imiquimod for the treatment of LM also supported by a recent Phase I clinical trial consisting of 30 subjects with histologically confirmed lesions [20]. This study by Naylor et al. assessed clinical and histological clearance of lesions 4 weeks after a 12-week treatment regimen of once daily application of imiquimod. Of the 28 evaluable subjects 26 (93 %) had a complete response while 2 were nonresponders (i.e., they had no application site reaction and had persistent tumor visibly and on biopsy at week 16). Furthermore, of the 28 subjects 80 percent were followed and had no evidence of relapse at 1 year.

                Metastatic melanoma

                Perhaps the most promising off-label use of imiquimod has been for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma metastases, as evidenced by several recent published studies. There are three case reports that illustrate some of the complexities in this approach. The first reported case of successful treatment of cutaneous metastatic lesions was by Steinmann in 2000 [21]. The patient was a female with a lesion on the breast, too extensive for excision or radiotherapy. Three-times-weekly imiquimod was initiated along with continuing treatment with dacarbazine. There was complete clearing in imiquimod-treated lesions by 12 weeks and a biopsy at week 18 revealed apoptotic melanocytes surrounded with dense lymphocytic infiltrates [21]. In 2003 Wolf reported of two cases who had recurrent melanoma metastasis following several treatment modalities [22]. The first patient was an elderly woman with recurrent cutaneous metastasis of melanoma on the lower leg previously treated with wide excision and CO2-laser ablation. A staging procedure revealed no lymph node or visceral metastasis in this patient. The second patient was a middle-aged man with a lesion on the parietal scalp. He had a positive sentinel lymph node but no other evidence of metastasis. Following resection of the skin lesion and affected lymph nodes, adjuvant IL-2, and chemotherapy, he had multiple recurrences around surgical scars. As subsequent treatment modalities were unsuccessful, imiquimod treatment was initiated for both patients. Three-times-weekly application for 4 months resulted in complete clearing with no residual melanoma cells on biopsy in the first patient. She was recurrence free at 15 months. The same dosing regimen was applied to the second patient, and he was found to be biopsy negative for melanoma with no apparent recurrence at 8 months.

                A 2002 study by Ugurel et al. involved a patient with satellite metastasis surrounding the excision site of a primary melanoma on the upper arm [23]. The patient refused further surgery, and daily application of imiquimod was initiated. The patient was monitored weekly by blood chemistries and hemograms, and ultrasound imaging of regional lymph nodes was done at 4-week intervals. After a total of 10 weeks of treatment, a biopsy of the lesion site revealed a lymphocyic infiltrate but no residual melanoma. Treatment was continued for 2 more weeks to achieve maintenance of therapeutic response. However, a biopsy-confirmed metastasis to the right axillary lymph node was discovered at week 12 post-therapy (and during continuation of treatment). The authors concluded that, although imiquimod may lead to eradication of skin metastasis of malignant melanoma, it may not prevent lymphogenous spread of tumor cells.

                ***************************************************************************

                A better sounding creme is being worked on at the Penn State Hershey Melanoma Center.

                http://dermatologistsblog.com/skin-cancer/melanoma/researchers-developing-a-topical-cream-to-kill-melanoma-cells/

                http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/8019153/melanoma_treatment_with_topical_cream_pg2.html?cat=70

                The researchers say that topical ISC-4 may one day replace surgery for melanoma treatment. However, the topical treatment, at this point, is projected only for superficial melanoma – tumors that have not penetrated the uppermost or top-most layer of skin. Dr. Robertson says that this topical compound could be added to creams, body lotions and sunscreens to prevent melanoma.

                It would also be interesting if your father could get into a trial with this treatmeant.

                "Researchers previously developed isoselenocyanates (ISC-4), by replacing sulfur with selenium. Researchers have now found that repeated topical application of ISC-4 can reduce tumor cell expansion in laboratory-generated human skin by 80 to 90 percent and decrease tumor development in mice skin by about 80 percent. The research also showed that the use of the compound is safe."

                **************************************************

                Australian Creme

                http://www.femail.com.au/skin-cream-melanoma.htm

                 

                JerryfromFauq
                Participant

                  Frank, her father is, I believe either stge 1 or 2 with C-kit (exon 11) acrual lentiginous melanoma.  The lst i knew no SLN had bee performed so the posibility of stage II is unknown.  So far The c-kit drugs hav not been prescribed for lees that stage III unresctable or stage IV.  This is one of those cases where one would  love to see what something like Gleevec would do to prevent the continuing couse of events.

                     Shimian, 2 questions: 1.  Is your father still overseas or is he with you now?

                       2. Is there any chance that you could get your Oncologist to run his own special gleevec trial to see if it would help? If still overseas would the system over there provide the targeted therapy?

                     Another option would be one of the cremes that have helped melanoma cases for surface melanomas.

                              http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,1513,0.htm

                               http://dermatology.cdlib.org/101/reviews/imiquimod/navi.html

                               http://www.healthcentral.com/skin-cancer/skin-cancer-treatment-30420-49.html

                    Sounds like this could be a rough treatment.(iniquimod, Alt

                  Abstract

                  Imiquimod is a novel synthetic compound that is a member of the imidazoquinolone family of drugs. This class of drugs, which also includes a more potent member, resimiquimod (R-848), is unique having the properties of topical immune response modifiers and stimulators. Imiquimod resembles a nucleoside analogue and is known for its potent induction of endogenous antiviral pro-inflammatory mediators. This article is a review of the relevant literature as it relates to the off-label applications of imiquimod 5 percent cream for treatment of cutaneous preneoplastic and neoplastic conditions including its recently approved indication for treating actinic keratoses.


                  Introduction

                  Figure 1

                  Imiquimod is a novel synthetic compound that is a member of the imidazoquinolone family of drugs. This class of drugs, which also includes a more potent member, resimiquimod (R-848), is unique having the properties of topical immune response modifiers and stimulators. Imiquimod resembles a nucleoside analogue (fig.1) and is known for its potent induction of endogenous antiviral pro-inflammatory mediators [1]. Following publication of several prospective studies showing that topical application of imiquimod is a safe and effective treatment for external anogenital and perianal warts, in 1997 the Food and Drug Administration approved its licensure for these manifestations of human papilloma virus infection [2]. In 2004 imiquimod 5 percent received FDA approval for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). As of this writing it is still marketed in the United States as a 5 percent cream (Aldara™, 3M Pharmaceuticals) for its two FDA approved usages. In recent years the off-label use of imiquimod 5 percent cream in dermatological practice, however, has shown this unique drug to be efficacious in a many dermatological conditions. This article is a review of the relevant literature as it relates to the off-label applications of imiquimod 5 percent cream for treatment of cutaneous preneoplastic and neoplastic conditions including its recently approved indication for treating AK.

                  Mechanism of action

                  Both in vivo and in vitro studies point to the role of imiquimod as an immune modulator via its binding to the Toll receptor 7 (TLR-7) present on dendritic cells, macrophages, and monocytes [1]. Subsequent activation of these cells leads to release of pro-inflammatory mediators IFN-α, TNF-α, IL-1, IL-12, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10, among others. These cytokines are believed to then drive the activation of the adaptive immune response toward the TH-1 or cell-mediated pathway and inhibit the TH-2 pathway. This modulation of the immune response, along with creation of an antiviral state including upregulation of NK-cell activity via induction of 2'5'oligoadenylate synthetase, is thought to be important for control of viruses and tumors [3]. Additionally, topical application of imiquimod has been shown to enhance the functional maturation and migration of Langerhan cells to regional lymph nodes, thus enhancing antigen presentation to naïve T cells and inducing a more specific immune response [1]. Recent findings shed some light on a possible direct action of imiquimod on basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The addition of imiquimod resulted in the induction of Fas receptors on tumor cells, and is postulated to lead to their subsequent apoptosis via binding of FasR to the Fas ligand, induction by neighboring BCC cells, and infiltration of lymphocytes. Berman et al. demonstrated that BCC cells in 3 of 4 patients treated with imiquimod for a 2-week period were positive for FasR, while all 5 vehicle-treated patients had FasR negative BCC cells at the end of the treatment period [4]. A number of other studies also provide evidence for direct antineoplastic activity of imiquimod via induction of apoptosis in tumor cells, which normally have mechanisms that resist apoptosis. In one study tumor-specific apoptosis induced by imiquimod was demonstrated both in SCC cell lines as measured by a number of apoptotic signals (Bcl-2, capsases, etc.) and in BCC tumors in vivo [5].

                  Nature of published studies

                  The nature of the published studies on the off-label applications of imiquimod range from anecdotal case reports to phase III clinical trials. Because of its action inducing an inflammatory response favoring the apoptosis of tumor cells (i.e., the activation of TH-1 pathway, stimulation of NK cells and killer T cells, and maturation of dermal antigen presenting cells) it is not surprising that the majority of the published studies examine the efficacy of imiquimod 5 percent cream in treating cutaneous oncological lesions. Table 1 summarizes the current stage of research on off-label applications of topical imiquimod cream for such lesions.

                  Table 1. Current stage of investigational study of Imiquimod efficacy
                  Cutaneous Lesion Stage of Study
                  Actinic Keratosis Phase III Clinical Trial
                  Superficial and Nodular BCC Phase III Clinical Trial
                  Sclerodermiform BCC Case Report
                  Bowen's Disease/SCC in Situ Phase II Clinical Trial
                  Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma Case Report
                  Lentigo Maligna Case Report
                  Metastatic Melanoma Case Report
                  Mycosis Fungoides Case Report
                  Keratoacanthoma Case Report
                  Extramammary Paget's Disease Case Report

                  Published findings

                  Actinic keratosis

                  Promising results of Phase II studies on actinic keratosis have been recently reported. One such study examined the efficacy of imiquimod for lesions on scalp, forehead, dorsal forearm, neck, and dorsal hand. The 5 percent cream was applied up to three-times per week for 12 weeks, although rest periods were allowed for subjects with troublesome local reactions. Of the treatment group, 84 percent experienced complete clinical and histological clearance of actinic keratoses, and 8 % had partial clearance. Recurrence after 1 year of treatment was seen in 10 % of patients [6]. In a similar study imiquimod was applied to lesion sites for 6-8 weeks depending on the severity of the application site reactions. All six patients in this study demonstrated histological clearing with no apparent signs of persisting lesions. No recurrences were observed during the 2-12 month followup period [7].

                  Salasche et al. performed an open-label study on the treatment of AKs and proposed a regimen of cycled therapy [8]. They used a rigid 4-week active intervention phase followed by a 4-week imposed rest period. During the treatment phase, imiquimod was applied once daily, 3 times a week. At the end of the 4-week rest phase, the treatment phase was repeated if any AKs were still present. They used up to three treatment phases. They concluded that their cycled approach of alternating 4 weeks of active therapy with 4 weeks of rest was able to achieve high efficacy while minimizing adverse effects.

                  Superficial basal cell carcinoma

                  The first dose-response study on the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma with imiquimod 5 percent cream was published in 1999. There were 35 patients randomized to several dosing regimens of imiquimod or a vehicle cream for a maximum treatment period of 16 weeks or 2 weeks following clinical clearance of lesions. Rest periods of up to 7 days were allowed for patients with severe localized reactions. Superficial BCC lesions cleared (on the basis of histological examination) in all patients (100 %) dosed twice a day, once a day, and three-times a week. Clearance was seen in 60 % of patients dosed twice weekly, 50 % of patients dosed once weekly, and 9 % of patients treated with vehicle. The median duration of treatment was 10 weeks for the twice-daily group, 13 weeks for once-daily group, and 14.5 weeks for three-times-weekly group [9].

                  Similar results were observed in later study encompassing a multicenter 6-week dose-response trial of 99 patients. Complete histological clearance was seen in 100 % (3/3) of patients in twice-daily regimen, 87.9 % (29/33) of patients in the once-daily regimen, 73.3 % (22/30) of patients in twice-daily three-times-per-week regimen, and 69.7 % (23/33) of patients in the once-daily, three-times-per-week regimen. The median duration of treatment for complete clearance was 10-16 weeks [10].

                  A larger Phase II study published in 2002 also assessed the efficacy of various dosing regimens on clearance of superficial BCC lesions. Patients were randomized to a 12-week treatment of lesions with imiquimod in one of four dosing groups. Histological examination of lesions 6-weeks post-treatment revealed complete response rates in 100 % (10/10), 87.1 % (27/31), 80.8 % (21/26), and 51.7 % (15/29) for patients in the twice-daily, once-daily, five-times-a-week, and three-times-a-week imiquimod groups, respectively, and 18.8 % (6/32) in the vehicle group. The authors conclude that daily or five-times-a-week dosing for 12 weeks is highly efficacious and has acceptable safety profiles [11]. To assess the effect of occlusion on response rates at low dosing frequencies a multicenter clinical trial published in 2002 randomized patients to one of 4 treatment arms: imiquimod application 2 or 3 days per week either with or without occlusion. The highest histological complete response rate of 87 % was seen in the 3-days-per-week with occlusion groups, but occlusion did not have a statistically significant effect on response rate at either dosing frequency. The response rate in 3-days-per-week groups, however, was significantly higher than the 2-days-per-week groups, which had response rates of 43 % and 50 % for patients with and without occlusion, respectively [12].

                  Nodular basal cell carcinoma

                  The occlusion study discussed above also included patients with nodular BCC lesions. In this group of patients the 3-days-per-week regimen with occlusion resulted in a complete histological clearance rate of 65 % versus 50 % in the no-occlusion group, a statistically insignificant finding. Furthermore, these response rates were not statistically different from those attained from the 2-days-per-week groups [12]. The lower overall efficacy of imiquimod 5 percent cream for the treatment of nodular BCC versus superficial BCC seen in this study has also been demonstrated in other studies. One such study was a Phase II clinical trial comparing efficacy of various dosing regimens in a 6-week study in Australia and New Zealand and a 12-week study in United States. In both studies histological examination of lesion site 6-weeks post-treatment showed the highest clearance rate in the once-daily-for-7-days-per-week groups, with 71 percent of patients in the 6-week study and 76 percent of patients in the 12-week study having complete response following treatment. As the authors point out these response rates were lower than the nearly 88 percent response rates seen in studies of superficial BCC lesions [13].

                  Sclerodermiform BCC

                  One case report demonstrating success in the treatment of a sclerodermiform BCC lesion on the right temple was found in the literature. Following 3-times-weekly application for 16 weeks, a histological examination of the lesion site showed only scar tissue. No recurrences were seen 9 months after completion of treatment [14].

                  Table 2. Summary of findings regarding efficacy topical imiquimod for treatment of subtypes of basal cell carcinoma.
                  BCC subtype Treatment duration Dosing regimen Percent complete histological clearance
                  Superficial BCC 10-14.5 Weeks 2 × a day 100 %
                  once a day 87.1-100 %
                  3 × a week 51.7-100 %
                  Nodular BCC 6-12 Weeks 3 × a week 50-65 %
                  once a day 71-76 %
                  Sclerodermiform BCC 16 weeks 3 × a week 100 %

                  Squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen's disease)

                  A number of studies have addressed the efficacy of imiquimod 5 percent cream in the treatment of Bowen's disease (i.e., SCC in situ). One of the larger ones was a Phase II, open-label study of sixteen patients with single lesions located on their legs (15 patients) and shoulder (1 patient). This 2001 study assessed histological clearance of the lesions 6 weeks following a 16-week treatment regimen of once-daily application of imiquimod 5 percent cream. Although only ten patients completed 16 weeks of treatment (others self treated for 4-8 weeks), 93 percent (14 of 15) showed complete clearance in post-treatment biopsy specimens. Furthermore the treatment site was tumor free in the 6-month followup visit in all thirteen patients who attended the followup [15]. Such long-term recurrence-free resolution of Bowenoid lesions treated with imiquimod have been observed in a number of case reports. One such case report is of a patient with a nose lesion who had no histological sign of recurrence 12 months following a 9-week treatment with imiqimod [16]. Another study reported the case of a patient with SCC in situ of the penis who was treated with imiquimod once daily for a total of 24 days with a 1-month rest period after the first 11 days. The lesion was histologically resolved, and the patient was tumor free 18 months following treatment [17].

                  Invasive squamous cell carcinoma

                  We found one study in the literature supporting the efficacious role of imiquimod 5 percent for treatment of invasive SCC [14]. The two patients were immunosuppressed renal transplant patients, one with the lesion on the temple and the other on the sternum. The patient with temple lesion was treated three times a week for 12 weeks and showed scarring in a biopsy obtained at week 16 and no evidence of residual tumor at a six-month followup. A patient with SCC on sternum was treated three times a week for 5 weeks followed by twice a week for 7 weeks because of uncomfortable local reaction. This patient had complete clearance at week 12 and was tumor free at an 8-month followup.

                  Lentigo maligna

                  The first reported case on the therapeutic use of imiquimod 5 percent for lentigo maligna (LM) was in 2000 by Ahmed and Berth-Jones [18]. The patient was an elderly man reluctant to have surgery who was therefore treated with topical imiquimod. Total treatment period was 7 months with frequent rest periods allowed for localized reactions to subside. There was complete histological and clinical clearance at follow-up and no evidence of recurrence at 9 months. Other case reports have shown similar successes with LM lesions. One such case report involves a patient with recurrent LM who was initially treated with CO2 laser [19]. Imiquimod application once or twice a day for 3 months resulted in no apparent residual LM on two punch biopsies. Because a complete excision was not done and long-term efficacy is unknown, the authors recommended that their patient continue treatment of the primary site for 12 months. The efficacy of imiquimod for the treatment of LM also supported by a recent Phase I clinical trial consisting of 30 subjects with histologically confirmed lesions [20]. This study by Naylor et al. assessed clinical and histological clearance of lesions 4 weeks after a 12-week treatment regimen of once daily application of imiquimod. Of the 28 evaluable subjects 26 (93 %) had a complete response while 2 were nonresponders (i.e., they had no application site reaction and had persistent tumor visibly and on biopsy at week 16). Furthermore, of the 28 subjects 80 percent were followed and had no evidence of relapse at 1 year.

                  Metastatic melanoma

                  Perhaps the most promising off-label use of imiquimod has been for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma metastases, as evidenced by several recent published studies. There are three case reports that illustrate some of the complexities in this approach. The first reported case of successful treatment of cutaneous metastatic lesions was by Steinmann in 2000 [21]. The patient was a female with a lesion on the breast, too extensive for excision or radiotherapy. Three-times-weekly imiquimod was initiated along with continuing treatment with dacarbazine. There was complete clearing in imiquimod-treated lesions by 12 weeks and a biopsy at week 18 revealed apoptotic melanocytes surrounded with dense lymphocytic infiltrates [21]. In 2003 Wolf reported of two cases who had recurrent melanoma metastasis following several treatment modalities [22]. The first patient was an elderly woman with recurrent cutaneous metastasis of melanoma on the lower leg previously treated with wide excision and CO2-laser ablation. A staging procedure revealed no lymph node or visceral metastasis in this patient. The second patient was a middle-aged man with a lesion on the parietal scalp. He had a positive sentinel lymph node but no other evidence of metastasis. Following resection of the skin lesion and affected lymph nodes, adjuvant IL-2, and chemotherapy, he had multiple recurrences around surgical scars. As subsequent treatment modalities were unsuccessful, imiquimod treatment was initiated for both patients. Three-times-weekly application for 4 months resulted in complete clearing with no residual melanoma cells on biopsy in the first patient. She was recurrence free at 15 months. The same dosing regimen was applied to the second patient, and he was found to be biopsy negative for melanoma with no apparent recurrence at 8 months.

                  A 2002 study by Ugurel et al. involved a patient with satellite metastasis surrounding the excision site of a primary melanoma on the upper arm [23]. The patient refused further surgery, and daily application of imiquimod was initiated. The patient was monitored weekly by blood chemistries and hemograms, and ultrasound imaging of regional lymph nodes was done at 4-week intervals. After a total of 10 weeks of treatment, a biopsy of the lesion site revealed a lymphocyic infiltrate but no residual melanoma. Treatment was continued for 2 more weeks to achieve maintenance of therapeutic response. However, a biopsy-confirmed metastasis to the right axillary lymph node was discovered at week 12 post-therapy (and during continuation of treatment). The authors concluded that, although imiquimod may lead to eradication of skin metastasis of malignant melanoma, it may not prevent lymphogenous spread of tumor cells.

                  ***************************************************************************

                  A better sounding creme is being worked on at the Penn State Hershey Melanoma Center.

                  http://dermatologistsblog.com/skin-cancer/melanoma/researchers-developing-a-topical-cream-to-kill-melanoma-cells/

                  http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/8019153/melanoma_treatment_with_topical_cream_pg2.html?cat=70

                  The researchers say that topical ISC-4 may one day replace surgery for melanoma treatment. However, the topical treatment, at this point, is projected only for superficial melanoma – tumors that have not penetrated the uppermost or top-most layer of skin. Dr. Robertson says that this topical compound could be added to creams, body lotions and sunscreens to prevent melanoma.

                  It would also be interesting if your father could get into a trial with this treatmeant.

                  "Researchers previously developed isoselenocyanates (ISC-4), by replacing sulfur with selenium. Researchers have now found that repeated topical application of ISC-4 can reduce tumor cell expansion in laboratory-generated human skin by 80 to 90 percent and decrease tumor development in mice skin by about 80 percent. The research also showed that the use of the compound is safe."

                  **************************************************

                  Australian Creme

                  http://www.femail.com.au/skin-cream-melanoma.htm

                   

                  NYKaren
                  Participant

                    Shimian,

                    I am seeing dramatic restults from the imiquimod (brand name is Aldera). 

                    In my case, even after excision with clear margins, the melanoma had invaded the local lymphatic system that we all have beneath our skin. So I had recurrence similar to your dad's…very near to the original site…

                    Treatments have been radiation (only held it at bay for a couple of weeks, Ipi (we don't THINK I responded), now IL-2.  The imiquimod was introduced to me before the Ipi, but it didn't do too much until I started the IL-2.  For me, they seem to work synergistically, but for many it works great on its own.

                    Hope this helps

                    karen

                    NYKaren
                    Participant

                      Shimian,

                      I am seeing dramatic restults from the imiquimod (brand name is Aldera). 

                      In my case, even after excision with clear margins, the melanoma had invaded the local lymphatic system that we all have beneath our skin. So I had recurrence similar to your dad's…very near to the original site…

                      Treatments have been radiation (only held it at bay for a couple of weeks, Ipi (we don't THINK I responded), now IL-2.  The imiquimod was introduced to me before the Ipi, but it didn't do too much until I started the IL-2.  For me, they seem to work synergistically, but for many it works great on its own.

                      Hope this helps

                      karen

                      NYKaren
                      Participant

                        Shimian,

                        I am seeing dramatic restults from the imiquimod (brand name is Aldera). 

                        In my case, even after excision with clear margins, the melanoma had invaded the local lymphatic system that we all have beneath our skin. So I had recurrence similar to your dad's…very near to the original site…

                        Treatments have been radiation (only held it at bay for a couple of weeks, Ipi (we don't THINK I responded), now IL-2.  The imiquimod was introduced to me before the Ipi, but it didn't do too much until I started the IL-2.  For me, they seem to work synergistically, but for many it works great on its own.

                        Hope this helps

                        karen

                        JerryfromFauq
                        Participant

                          Frank, her father is, I believe either stge 1 or 2 with C-kit (exon 11) acrual lentiginous melanoma.  The lst i knew no SLN had bee performed so the posibility of stage II is unknown.  So far The c-kit drugs hav not been prescribed for lees that stage III unresctable or stage IV.  This is one of those cases where one would  love to see what something like Gleevec would do to prevent the continuing couse of events.

                             Shimian, 2 questions: 1.  Is your father still overseas or is he with you now?

                               2. Is there any chance that you could get your Oncologist to run his own special gleevec trial to see if it would help? If still overseas would the system over there provide the targeted therapy?

                             Another option would be one of the cremes that have helped melanoma cases for surface melanomas.

                                      http://www.cancercompass.com/message-board/message/all,1513,0.htm

                                       http://dermatology.cdlib.org/101/reviews/imiquimod/navi.html

                                       http://www.healthcentral.com/skin-cancer/skin-cancer-treatment-30420-49.html

                            Sounds like this could be a rough treatment.(iniquimod, Alt

                          Abstract

                          Imiquimod is a novel synthetic compound that is a member of the imidazoquinolone family of drugs. This class of drugs, which also includes a more potent member, resimiquimod (R-848), is unique having the properties of topical immune response modifiers and stimulators. Imiquimod resembles a nucleoside analogue and is known for its potent induction of endogenous antiviral pro-inflammatory mediators. This article is a review of the relevant literature as it relates to the off-label applications of imiquimod 5 percent cream for treatment of cutaneous preneoplastic and neoplastic conditions including its recently approved indication for treating actinic keratoses.


                          Introduction

                          Figure 1

                          Imiquimod is a novel synthetic compound that is a member of the imidazoquinolone family of drugs. This class of drugs, which also includes a more potent member, resimiquimod (R-848), is unique having the properties of topical immune response modifiers and stimulators. Imiquimod resembles a nucleoside analogue (fig.1) and is known for its potent induction of endogenous antiviral pro-inflammatory mediators [1]. Following publication of several prospective studies showing that topical application of imiquimod is a safe and effective treatment for external anogenital and perianal warts, in 1997 the Food and Drug Administration approved its licensure for these manifestations of human papilloma virus infection [2]. In 2004 imiquimod 5 percent received FDA approval for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). As of this writing it is still marketed in the United States as a 5 percent cream (Aldara™, 3M Pharmaceuticals) for its two FDA approved usages. In recent years the off-label use of imiquimod 5 percent cream in dermatological practice, however, has shown this unique drug to be efficacious in a many dermatological conditions. This article is a review of the relevant literature as it relates to the off-label applications of imiquimod 5 percent cream for treatment of cutaneous preneoplastic and neoplastic conditions including its recently approved indication for treating AK.

                          Mechanism of action

                          Both in vivo and in vitro studies point to the role of imiquimod as an immune modulator via its binding to the Toll receptor 7 (TLR-7) present on dendritic cells, macrophages, and monocytes [1]. Subsequent activation of these cells leads to release of pro-inflammatory mediators IFN-α, TNF-α, IL-1, IL-12, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10, among others. These cytokines are believed to then drive the activation of the adaptive immune response toward the TH-1 or cell-mediated pathway and inhibit the TH-2 pathway. This modulation of the immune response, along with creation of an antiviral state including upregulation of NK-cell activity via induction of 2'5'oligoadenylate synthetase, is thought to be important for control of viruses and tumors [3]. Additionally, topical application of imiquimod has been shown to enhance the functional maturation and migration of Langerhan cells to regional lymph nodes, thus enhancing antigen presentation to naïve T cells and inducing a more specific immune response [1]. Recent findings shed some light on a possible direct action of imiquimod on basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The addition of imiquimod resulted in the induction of Fas receptors on tumor cells, and is postulated to lead to their subsequent apoptosis via binding of FasR to the Fas ligand, induction by neighboring BCC cells, and infiltration of lymphocytes. Berman et al. demonstrated that BCC cells in 3 of 4 patients treated with imiquimod for a 2-week period were positive for FasR, while all 5 vehicle-treated patients had FasR negative BCC cells at the end of the treatment period [4]. A number of other studies also provide evidence for direct antineoplastic activity of imiquimod via induction of apoptosis in tumor cells, which normally have mechanisms that resist apoptosis. In one study tumor-specific apoptosis induced by imiquimod was demonstrated both in SCC cell lines as measured by a number of apoptotic signals (Bcl-2, capsases, etc.) and in BCC tumors in vivo [5].

                          Nature of published studies

                          The nature of the published studies on the off-label applications of imiquimod range from anecdotal case reports to phase III clinical trials. Because of its action inducing an inflammatory response favoring the apoptosis of tumor cells (i.e., the activation of TH-1 pathway, stimulation of NK cells and killer T cells, and maturation of dermal antigen presenting cells) it is not surprising that the majority of the published studies examine the efficacy of imiquimod 5 percent cream in treating cutaneous oncological lesions. Table 1 summarizes the current stage of research on off-label applications of topical imiquimod cream for such lesions.

                          Table 1. Current stage of investigational study of Imiquimod efficacy
                          Cutaneous Lesion Stage of Study
                          Actinic Keratosis Phase III Clinical Trial
                          Superficial and Nodular BCC Phase III Clinical Trial
                          Sclerodermiform BCC Case Report
                          Bowen's Disease/SCC in Situ Phase II Clinical Trial
                          Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma Case Report
                          Lentigo Maligna Case Report
                          Metastatic Melanoma Case Report
                          Mycosis Fungoides Case Report
                          Keratoacanthoma Case Report
                          Extramammary Paget's Disease Case Report

                          Published findings

                          Actinic keratosis

                          Promising results of Phase II studies on actinic keratosis have been recently reported. One such study examined the efficacy of imiquimod for lesions on scalp, forehead, dorsal forearm, neck, and dorsal hand. The 5 percent cream was applied up to three-times per week for 12 weeks, although rest periods were allowed for subjects with troublesome local reactions. Of the treatment group, 84 percent experienced complete clinical and histological clearance of actinic keratoses, and 8 % had partial clearance. Recurrence after 1 year of treatment was seen in 10 % of patients [6]. In a similar study imiquimod was applied to lesion sites for 6-8 weeks depending on the severity of the application site reactions. All six patients in this study demonstrated histological clearing with no apparent signs of persisting lesions. No recurrences were observed during the 2-12 month followup period [7].

                          Salasche et al. performed an open-label study on the treatment of AKs and proposed a regimen of cycled therapy [8]. They used a rigid 4-week active intervention phase followed by a 4-week imposed rest period. During the treatment phase, imiquimod was applied once daily, 3 times a week. At the end of the 4-week rest phase, the treatment phase was repeated if any AKs were still present. They used up to three treatment phases. They concluded that their cycled approach of alternating 4 weeks of active therapy with 4 weeks of rest was able to achieve high efficacy while minimizing adverse effects.

                          Superficial basal cell carcinoma

                          The first dose-response study on the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma with imiquimod 5 percent cream was published in 1999. There were 35 patients randomized to several dosing regimens of imiquimod or a vehicle cream for a maximum treatment period of 16 weeks or 2 weeks following clinical clearance of lesions. Rest periods of up to 7 days were allowed for patients with severe localized reactions. Superficial BCC lesions cleared (on the basis of histological examination) in all patients (100 %) dosed twice a day, once a day, and three-times a week. Clearance was seen in 60 % of patients dosed twice weekly, 50 % of patients dosed once weekly, and 9 % of patients treated with vehicle. The median duration of treatment was 10 weeks for the twice-daily group, 13 weeks for once-daily group, and 14.5 weeks for three-times-weekly group [9].

                          Similar results were observed in later study encompassing a multicenter 6-week dose-response trial of 99 patients. Complete histological clearance was seen in 100 % (3/3) of patients in twice-daily regimen, 87.9 % (29/33) of patients in the once-daily regimen, 73.3 % (22/30) of patients in twice-daily three-times-per-week regimen, and 69.7 % (23/33) of patients in the once-daily, three-times-per-week regimen. The median duration of treatment for complete clearance was 10-16 weeks [10].

                          A larger Phase II study published in 2002 also assessed the efficacy of various dosing regimens on clearance of superficial BCC lesions. Patients were randomized to a 12-week treatment of lesions with imiquimod in one of four dosing groups. Histological examination of lesions 6-weeks post-treatment revealed complete response rates in 100 % (10/10), 87.1 % (27/31), 80.8 % (21/26), and 51.7 % (15/29) for patients in the twice-daily, once-daily, five-times-a-week, and three-times-a-week imiquimod groups, respectively, and 18.8 % (6/32) in the vehicle group. The authors conclude that daily or five-times-a-week dosing for 12 weeks is highly efficacious and has acceptable safety profiles [11]. To assess the effect of occlusion on response rates at low dosing frequencies a multicenter clinical trial published in 2002 randomized patients to one of 4 treatment arms: imiquimod application 2 or 3 days per week either with or without occlusion. The highest histological complete response rate of 87 % was seen in the 3-days-per-week with occlusion groups, but occlusion did not have a statistically significant effect on response rate at either dosing frequency. The response rate in 3-days-per-week groups, however, was significantly higher than the 2-days-per-week groups, which had response rates of 43 % and 50 % for patients with and without occlusion, respectively [12].

                          Nodular basal cell carcinoma

                          The occlusion study discussed above also included patients with nodular BCC lesions. In this group of patients the 3-days-per-week regimen with occlusion resulted in a complete histological clearance rate of 65 % versus 50 % in the no-occlusion group, a statistically insignificant finding. Furthermore, these response rates were not statistically different from those attained from the 2-days-per-week groups [12]. The lower overall efficacy of imiquimod 5 percent cream for the treatment of nodular BCC versus superficial BCC seen in this study has also been demonstrated in other studies. One such study was a Phase II clinical trial comparing efficacy of various dosing regimens in a 6-week study in Australia and New Zealand and a 12-week study in United States. In both studies histological examination of lesion site 6-weeks post-treatment showed the highest clearance rate in the once-daily-for-7-days-per-week groups, with 71 percent of patients in the 6-week study and 76 percent of patients in the 12-week study having complete response following treatment. As the authors point out these response rates were lower than the nearly 88 percent response rates seen in studies of superficial BCC lesions [13].

                          Sclerodermiform BCC

                          One case report demonstrating success in the treatment of a sclerodermiform BCC lesion on the right temple was found in the literature. Following 3-times-weekly application for 16 weeks, a histological examination of the lesion site showed only scar tissue. No recurrences were seen 9 months after completion of treatment [14].

                          Table 2. Summary of findings regarding efficacy topical imiquimod for treatment of subtypes of basal cell carcinoma.
                          BCC subtype Treatment duration Dosing regimen Percent complete histological clearance
                          Superficial BCC 10-14.5 Weeks 2 × a day 100 %
                          once a day 87.1-100 %
                          3 × a week 51.7-100 %
                          Nodular BCC 6-12 Weeks 3 × a week 50-65 %
                          once a day 71-76 %
                          Sclerodermiform BCC 16 weeks 3 × a week 100 %

                          Squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen's disease)

                          A number of studies have addressed the efficacy of imiquimod 5 percent cream in the treatment of Bowen's disease (i.e., SCC in situ). One of the larger ones was a Phase II, open-label study of sixteen patients with single lesions located on their legs (15 patients) and shoulder (1 patient). This 2001 study assessed histological clearance of the lesions 6 weeks following a 16-week treatment regimen of once-daily application of imiquimod 5 percent cream. Although only ten patients completed 16 weeks of treatment (others self treated for 4-8 weeks), 93 percent (14 of 15) showed complete clearance in post-treatment biopsy specimens. Furthermore the treatment site was tumor free in the 6-month followup visit in all thirteen patients who attended the followup [15]. Such long-term recurrence-free resolution of Bowenoid lesions treated with imiquimod have been observed in a number of case reports. One such case report is of a patient with a nose lesion who had no histological sign of recurrence 12 months following a 9-week treatment with imiqimod [16]. Another study reported the case of a patient with SCC in situ of the penis who was treated with imiquimod once daily for a total of 24 days with a 1-month rest period after the first 11 days. The lesion was histologically resolved, and the patient was tumor free 18 months following treatment [17].

                          Invasive squamous cell carcinoma

                          We found one study in the literature supporting the efficacious role of imiquimod 5 percent for treatment of invasive SCC [14]. The two patients were immunosuppressed renal transplant patients, one with the lesion on the temple and the other on the sternum. The patient with temple lesion was treated three times a week for 12 weeks and showed scarring in a biopsy obtained at week 16 and no evidence of residual tumor at a six-month followup. A patient with SCC on sternum was treated three times a week for 5 weeks followed by twice a week for 7 weeks because of uncomfortable local reaction. This patient had complete clearance at week 12 and was tumor free at an 8-month followup.

                          Lentigo maligna

                          The first reported case on the therapeutic use of imiquimod 5 percent for lentigo maligna (LM) was in 2000 by Ahmed and Berth-Jones [18]. The patient was an elderly man reluctant to have surgery who was therefore treated with topical imiquimod. Total treatment period was 7 months with frequent rest periods allowed for localized reactions to subside. There was complete histological and clinical clearance at follow-up and no evidence of recurrence at 9 months. Other case reports have shown similar successes with LM lesions. One such case report involves a patient with recurrent LM who was initially treated with CO2 laser [19]. Imiquimod application once or twice a day for 3 months resulted in no apparent residual LM on two punch biopsies. Because a complete excision was not done and long-term efficacy is unknown, the authors recommended that their patient continue treatment of the primary site for 12 months. The efficacy of imiquimod for the treatment of LM also supported by a recent Phase I clinical trial consisting of 30 subjects with histologically confirmed lesions [20]. This study by Naylor et al. assessed clinical and histological clearance of lesions 4 weeks after a 12-week treatment regimen of once daily application of imiquimod. Of the 28 evaluable subjects 26 (93 %) had a complete response while 2 were nonresponders (i.e., they had no application site reaction and had persistent tumor visibly and on biopsy at week 16). Furthermore, of the 28 subjects 80 percent were followed and had no evidence of relapse at 1 year.

                          Metastatic melanoma

                          Perhaps the most promising off-label use of imiquimod has been for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma metastases, as evidenced by several recent published studies. There are three case reports that illustrate some of the complexities in this approach. The first reported case of successful treatment of cutaneous metastatic lesions was by Steinmann in 2000 [21]. The patient was a female with a lesion on the breast, too extensive for excision or radiotherapy. Three-times-weekly imiquimod was initiated along with continuing treatment with dacarbazine. There was complete clearing in imiquimod-treated lesions by 12 weeks and a biopsy at week 18 revealed apoptotic melanocytes surrounded with dense lymphocytic infiltrates [21]. In 2003 Wolf reported of two cases who had recurrent melanoma metastasis following several treatment modalities [22]. The first patient was an elderly woman with recurrent cutaneous metastasis of melanoma on the lower leg previously treated with wide excision and CO2-laser ablation. A staging procedure revealed no lymph node or visceral metastasis in this patient. The second patient was a middle-aged man with a lesion on the parietal scalp. He had a positive sentinel lymph node but no other evidence of metastasis. Following resection of the skin lesion and affected lymph nodes, adjuvant IL-2, and chemotherapy, he had multiple recurrences around surgical scars. As subsequent treatment modalities were unsuccessful, imiquimod treatment was initiated for both patients. Three-times-weekly application for 4 months resulted in complete clearing with no residual melanoma cells on biopsy in the first patient. She was recurrence free at 15 months. The same dosing regimen was applied to the second patient, and he was found to be biopsy negative for melanoma with no apparent recurrence at 8 months.

                          A 2002 study by Ugurel et al. involved a patient with satellite metastasis surrounding the excision site of a primary melanoma on the upper arm [23]. The patient refused further surgery, and daily application of imiquimod was initiated. The patient was monitored weekly by blood chemistries and hemograms, and ultrasound imaging of regional lymph nodes was done at 4-week intervals. After a total of 10 weeks of treatment, a biopsy of the lesion site revealed a lymphocyic infiltrate but no residual melanoma. Treatment was continued for 2 more weeks to achieve maintenance of therapeutic response. However, a biopsy-confirmed metastasis to the right axillary lymph node was discovered at week 12 post-therapy (and during continuation of treatment). The authors concluded that, although imiquimod may lead to eradication of skin metastasis of malignant melanoma, it may not prevent lymphogenous spread of tumor cells.

                          ***************************************************************************

                          A better sounding creme is being worked on at the Penn State Hershey Melanoma Center.

                          http://dermatologistsblog.com/skin-cancer/melanoma/researchers-developing-a-topical-cream-to-kill-melanoma-cells/

                          http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/8019153/melanoma_treatment_with_topical_cream_pg2.html?cat=70

                          The researchers say that topical ISC-4 may one day replace surgery for melanoma treatment. However, the topical treatment, at this point, is projected only for superficial melanoma – tumors that have not penetrated the uppermost or top-most layer of skin. Dr. Robertson says that this topical compound could be added to creams, body lotions and sunscreens to prevent melanoma.

                          It would also be interesting if your father could get into a trial with this treatmeant.

                          "Researchers previously developed isoselenocyanates (ISC-4), by replacing sulfur with selenium. Researchers have now found that repeated topical application of ISC-4 can reduce tumor cell expansion in laboratory-generated human skin by 80 to 90 percent and decrease tumor development in mice skin by about 80 percent. The research also showed that the use of the compound is safe."

                          **************************************************

                          Australian Creme

                          http://www.femail.com.au/skin-cream-melanoma.htm

                           

                        FormerCaregiver
                        Participant

                          I have just had a look at your profile, but couldn't find any info about your father's melanoma history. Although you mention that the biopsy reports showed melanoma in situ, I always think that it is wise to be cautious. Therefore, has your father had whole body PET and/or CT scan within the last few months? If so, what did the results show?

                          Best wishes

                          Frank from Australia

                      Viewing 2 reply threads
                      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                      About the MRF Patient Forum

                      The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                      The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

                      Popular Topics