› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Circulating Melanoma Cells as a Predictive Biomarker
- This topic has 12 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 3 months ago by
JC.
- Post
-
- May 15, 2013 at 9:44 pm
Commentary
Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2013) 133, 1460–1462; doi:10.1038/jid.2013.34
Commentary
Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2013) 133, 1460–1462; doi:10.1038/jid.2013.34
Circulating Melanoma Cells as a Predictive Biomarker
Giorgos Karakousis1, Ruifeng Yang2 and Xiaowei Xu2
- 1Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- 2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Correspondence: Xiaowei Xu, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
The prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma has improved significantly with targeted therapeutic agents and immunotherapies. Detection of early melanoma recurrence after treatment will be beneficial to switch patients who fail on one therapy to different modalities. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells released by a tumor into the peripheral blood. These cells hold potential as prognostic, predictive, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for treatment. In this issue, Khoja et al. report that melanoma CTCs can be detected using Melcam and high molecular weight melanoma–associated antibody. They found that in 101 stage IV melanoma patients, CTC numbers ranged between 0 and 36/7.5 ml blood; 26% of the patients had
2 CTCs at baseline. The CTC number (
2 CTCs) at baseline was significantly prognostic for median overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analysis. Patients receiving treatment where CTC numbers remained
2 CTCs during their treatment had shorter median OS than those who maintained <2 CTCs (7 vs. 10 months, hazard ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.14–0.81, log-rank test P=0.015). The implications of this work are substantial in counseling patients about their prognosis and in helping to assess responses to systemic therapies.
- Replies
-
-
- May 15, 2013 at 10:13 pm
So is this a blood test that someone at Stage I can do annually to ensure there has been no spread?
-
- May 21, 2013 at 3:37 pm
I would not recommend it for a number of reasons:
1.) it remains only available at a research level
2.) Even if Im wrong about # 1, issues are that EVEN is stage 4 tumors, only 0-36 cells were found in 7.5mL–with microscopic relapse that number is close to zero
3.) Many studies on earlier stage –esp stage 3–done in the past, found very little correlation to Relapse (the presence did not reassure relapse–the absence did not reassure non-relapse)
4.) if you find it, what do you do with the information–they wouldn't give anybody interferon, ipilimumab, IL-2 etc based on this -
- May 21, 2013 at 3:37 pm
I would not recommend it for a number of reasons:
1.) it remains only available at a research level
2.) Even if Im wrong about # 1, issues are that EVEN is stage 4 tumors, only 0-36 cells were found in 7.5mL–with microscopic relapse that number is close to zero
3.) Many studies on earlier stage –esp stage 3–done in the past, found very little correlation to Relapse (the presence did not reassure relapse–the absence did not reassure non-relapse)
4.) if you find it, what do you do with the information–they wouldn't give anybody interferon, ipilimumab, IL-2 etc based on this -
- May 21, 2013 at 3:37 pm
I would not recommend it for a number of reasons:
1.) it remains only available at a research level
2.) Even if Im wrong about # 1, issues are that EVEN is stage 4 tumors, only 0-36 cells were found in 7.5mL–with microscopic relapse that number is close to zero
3.) Many studies on earlier stage –esp stage 3–done in the past, found very little correlation to Relapse (the presence did not reassure relapse–the absence did not reassure non-relapse)
4.) if you find it, what do you do with the information–they wouldn't give anybody interferon, ipilimumab, IL-2 etc based on this
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.