New here and confused by pathology report

My background: I grew up very outdoorsy (in the 60s and 70s we played outside until the streetlights came on!), beaches, camping, and in my teens, working on the family farm. I have almost all the risk factors as far as physical appearance and sunburn history, although my last sunburn was probably 25 years ago or more. Until 2010 I enjoyed very good health, but that year almost simultaneously was diagnosed with a basal cell carcinoma and tall cell variant thyroid cancer. I see oncologists every 6 months for thyroid follow up, and go for regular screenings for skin cancer and my dermatologist at MSK has taken lots of photos. I know I am lucky to have had just a BCC!

My skin screenings are every 6 months. Two weeks ago I had an excisional biopsy because a spot on my back had changed significantly (much spread, bi or tri color, pseudopods). I wasn’t too worried because the area had been biopsied by a local dr in 2010 so I knew a recurrent mole could look more scary than it actually is. I got the stitches out today and asked for a copy of the pathology report, thanks to reading this board! OK, I guess I was more worried than I wanted to admit because I have read the messages here daily. Also, in today’s mail I received the very simplified results. I will share both so hopefully I can understand whether no cancer was found, or there was cancer but the excision removed it all.

The simple report in the mail has choices. The first line says “Biopsy report is benign and does not require any follow up”. That one is not checked! The next one down is checked, and says “The re-excision is clear and no further treatment is required.”

The pathology report says the specimen was 1.8 x 1.0 x 0.6 cm .
Clinical diagnosis: some increased pigment within scar noted. Rule out recurrent nevus. 9×6 mm.
Diagnosis from pathologist: residual/recurrent paracicatricial compound nevus with atypical features, margins negative.
Comment: the residual nevus shows lentiginous intraepidermal growth of atypical melanocytes and dermal architectural disorder. There are also background lentigines.

I am guessing there is no cause for concern and of course can call the office tomorrow. I’m just confused if they caught something or there was nothing there! Thank you for any insight you can provide. I know you all have much greater concerns!
Best to everyone,
Laura