› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Annual Pet Scan for Stage 1
- This topic has 30 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 6 months ago by
Janner.
- Post
-
- December 12, 2016 at 5:29 pm
Hi everyone,
I have a question. I was diagnosed with Stage 1 (.75mm) melanoma in June 2016. I had a WLE along with one lymph node removed as a proactive measure. I also had a full body PET Scan, brain MRI and CT scan. All came back clear NED.
I see my dermatologist every three months along with my surigical oncologist. My surgical oncologist mentioned that I will probably have another PET scan in one year. Is this typical for my stage? I am worried about the possible radiation effect on my body having these scans.
My mom was diagnosed with Melanoma in-situ about 20+ years ago. My dad has had basal and squamous places removed but No other cancer in my family.
Thanks in advance for your input.
- Replies
-
-
- December 12, 2016 at 6:56 pm
No, this is NOT typical and can be more damaging in the long run. I am shocked the procedure was even approved!
For your stage, the risk of finding random junk that will require more procedures let alone excessive radiation (tracer & scans) just isn't worth it.
Overkill and then some!
Just saying. IMHO – I would decline the scans and go with just skin / lymphnode checks.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 6:56 pm
No, this is NOT typical and can be more damaging in the long run. I am shocked the procedure was even approved!
For your stage, the risk of finding random junk that will require more procedures let alone excessive radiation (tracer & scans) just isn't worth it.
Overkill and then some!
Just saying. IMHO – I would decline the scans and go with just skin / lymphnode checks.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:16 pm
True for stage 1. Later stages, like 3 & 4, you get scanned every 3 months and then it lowers to every six months at some point, depending on where you get treated. The benefit for late stages to get scanned frequently and catch recurrance or progression outweighs the risk of scanning. It is not neccessary for low stages, as they have a much higher liklihood of never having it metastisize, so it's unnecessary exposure to get scanned more than one time, unless something clinically comes up that gives suspicion and needs further investigating with a scan.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:16 pm
True for stage 1. Later stages, like 3 & 4, you get scanned every 3 months and then it lowers to every six months at some point, depending on where you get treated. The benefit for late stages to get scanned frequently and catch recurrance or progression outweighs the risk of scanning. It is not neccessary for low stages, as they have a much higher liklihood of never having it metastisize, so it's unnecessary exposure to get scanned more than one time, unless something clinically comes up that gives suspicion and needs further investigating with a scan.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:16 pm
True for stage 1. Later stages, like 3 & 4, you get scanned every 3 months and then it lowers to every six months at some point, depending on where you get treated. The benefit for late stages to get scanned frequently and catch recurrance or progression outweighs the risk of scanning. It is not neccessary for low stages, as they have a much higher liklihood of never having it metastisize, so it's unnecessary exposure to get scanned more than one time, unless something clinically comes up that gives suspicion and needs further investigating with a scan.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 6:56 pm
No, this is NOT typical and can be more damaging in the long run. I am shocked the procedure was even approved!
For your stage, the risk of finding random junk that will require more procedures let alone excessive radiation (tracer & scans) just isn't worth it.
Overkill and then some!
Just saying. IMHO – I would decline the scans and go with just skin / lymphnode checks.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 9:10 pm
Hi Lisa, when it comes to dealing with stage 1 or stage 0 in situ melanoma Janner gives out great information. I would take her advice from your first post and stay away from melanoma sites or the internet about melanoma. If you have a good derm at this point and visit them every 6months or so and maybe do some mole mapping of your skin and practise sun safety you should be good going forward. Doing PET CT scans every year for your stage is way off side. Best Wishes!!!Ed
-
- December 12, 2016 at 9:10 pm
Hi Lisa, when it comes to dealing with stage 1 or stage 0 in situ melanoma Janner gives out great information. I would take her advice from your first post and stay away from melanoma sites or the internet about melanoma. If you have a good derm at this point and visit them every 6months or so and maybe do some mole mapping of your skin and practise sun safety you should be good going forward. Doing PET CT scans every year for your stage is way off side. Best Wishes!!!Ed
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:42 pm
Thank you, Ed.
I do trust my doctors and have good ones. Thanks! I'm just so confused as to why my surgical oncologist wants me to have another pet scan this summer (June will be one year) when no symptoms are present. He is a melanoma and breast cancer surgical oncologist.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:42 pm
Thank you, Ed.
I do trust my doctors and have good ones. Thanks! I'm just so confused as to why my surgical oncologist wants me to have another pet scan this summer (June will be one year) when no symptoms are present. He is a melanoma and breast cancer surgical oncologist.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:53 pm
Different doctors have different opinions and philosophies. Scanning you without clinical reason is far beyond standard of care. It's up to you if you want to subject yourself to more radiation, but in reality, you really don't need to. Most insurance companies won't approve it, due to it not being the standard of care, and insurance companies sure don't like to pay for things that they don't need to pay for (insurance can be a pain in the butt just to get them to pay for the things that ARE standard). In this case, they have good reason not to pay for any scan unless your doctor had reason to suspect an internal spread.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:53 pm
Different doctors have different opinions and philosophies. Scanning you without clinical reason is far beyond standard of care. It's up to you if you want to subject yourself to more radiation, but in reality, you really don't need to. Most insurance companies won't approve it, due to it not being the standard of care, and insurance companies sure don't like to pay for things that they don't need to pay for (insurance can be a pain in the butt just to get them to pay for the things that ARE standard). In this case, they have good reason not to pay for any scan unless your doctor had reason to suspect an internal spread.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:53 pm
Different doctors have different opinions and philosophies. Scanning you without clinical reason is far beyond standard of care. It's up to you if you want to subject yourself to more radiation, but in reality, you really don't need to. Most insurance companies won't approve it, due to it not being the standard of care, and insurance companies sure don't like to pay for things that they don't need to pay for (insurance can be a pain in the butt just to get them to pay for the things that ARE standard). In this case, they have good reason not to pay for any scan unless your doctor had reason to suspect an internal spread.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:57 pm
I think it is overkill and insurance is unlikely to pay – and for good reason. There are no protocols for stage 1 that include ANY scans, even at diagnosis. (Some institutions don't regularly scan stage 3 or 4 unless there are symptoms). If he wants to scan, suggest a chest x-ray. Much cheaper and much less radiation and insurance will likely cover. Chest X-rays are done by some docs for stage 1 even if it is only a baseline X-ray. The only way insurance would cover this is if he justifies this by saying you have symptoms of something. Most deductibles are high and you would be paying for it unless some other medical condition justifies that first. I don't care how good he is, he is not following the norm that all other stage 1 warriors follow. You can choose to do what you want either way – this is your call and no one else's including your doc- but understand that the only stage 1s who really get PET scans (at any time) are if they have symptoms and it's suspected they have progressed to a more advanced stage. Even then, a PET scan might not be the first step.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:57 pm
I think it is overkill and insurance is unlikely to pay – and for good reason. There are no protocols for stage 1 that include ANY scans, even at diagnosis. (Some institutions don't regularly scan stage 3 or 4 unless there are symptoms). If he wants to scan, suggest a chest x-ray. Much cheaper and much less radiation and insurance will likely cover. Chest X-rays are done by some docs for stage 1 even if it is only a baseline X-ray. The only way insurance would cover this is if he justifies this by saying you have symptoms of something. Most deductibles are high and you would be paying for it unless some other medical condition justifies that first. I don't care how good he is, he is not following the norm that all other stage 1 warriors follow. You can choose to do what you want either way – this is your call and no one else's including your doc- but understand that the only stage 1s who really get PET scans (at any time) are if they have symptoms and it's suspected they have progressed to a more advanced stage. Even then, a PET scan might not be the first step.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:57 pm
I think it is overkill and insurance is unlikely to pay – and for good reason. There are no protocols for stage 1 that include ANY scans, even at diagnosis. (Some institutions don't regularly scan stage 3 or 4 unless there are symptoms). If he wants to scan, suggest a chest x-ray. Much cheaper and much less radiation and insurance will likely cover. Chest X-rays are done by some docs for stage 1 even if it is only a baseline X-ray. The only way insurance would cover this is if he justifies this by saying you have symptoms of something. Most deductibles are high and you would be paying for it unless some other medical condition justifies that first. I don't care how good he is, he is not following the norm that all other stage 1 warriors follow. You can choose to do what you want either way – this is your call and no one else's including your doc- but understand that the only stage 1s who really get PET scans (at any time) are if they have symptoms and it's suspected they have progressed to a more advanced stage. Even then, a PET scan might not be the first step.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 11:42 pm
Thank you, Ed.
I do trust my doctors and have good ones. Thanks! I'm just so confused as to why my surgical oncologist wants me to have another pet scan this summer (June will be one year) when no symptoms are present. He is a melanoma and breast cancer surgical oncologist.
-
- December 12, 2016 at 9:10 pm
Hi Lisa, when it comes to dealing with stage 1 or stage 0 in situ melanoma Janner gives out great information. I would take her advice from your first post and stay away from melanoma sites or the internet about melanoma. If you have a good derm at this point and visit them every 6months or so and maybe do some mole mapping of your skin and practise sun safety you should be good going forward. Doing PET CT scans every year for your stage is way off side. Best Wishes!!!Ed
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.