› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Clark’s level newly diagnosed
- This topic has 39 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by
KariSlaught.
- Post
-
- August 23, 2013 at 11:14 pm
Hi,
Hi,
I'm a 43 year old female who was diagnosed with melanoma yesterday. So far, I only have the pathology report from the biopsy that was done last week by a PA at a dermatologist's office. The path report says Clark's level 4 but Breslow depth .29mm. I have an appointment with a general surgeon next week to talk about scheduling surgery to remove surrounding tissue. This mole was on my back and it was about .4 cm in size. I'm thinking that I am safe because the Breslow depth is .29mm. After researching online I found that Clark's level 4 isn't so great. Any input would be appreciated. I'm going to schedule an appointment at a melonoma clinic after I talk to the surgeon. Can I determine my stage by the path report? Regression reads not present, Ulceration reads not present and Dermal mitosis is not identified.
I will not be going back to the PA who did the biopsy or that office. She called me and said I just needed follow up. I'm not sure that she really knows what she is doing.
Thank you!
- Replies
-
-
- August 24, 2013 at 12:55 am
Clark's level is an outdated way of describing how deep the melanoma cells have penetrated into the skin. It's something that a pathologist determines using a microscope. Clark's level has nothing to do with the stage of the melanoma and is a poor predictor of your prognosis.
Try to ignore the Clark's level info– it really gives you no useful information.
-
- August 24, 2013 at 12:55 am
Clark's level is an outdated way of describing how deep the melanoma cells have penetrated into the skin. It's something that a pathologist determines using a microscope. Clark's level has nothing to do with the stage of the melanoma and is a poor predictor of your prognosis.
Try to ignore the Clark's level info– it really gives you no useful information.
-
- August 24, 2013 at 12:55 am
Clark's level is an outdated way of describing how deep the melanoma cells have penetrated into the skin. It's something that a pathologist determines using a microscope. Clark's level has nothing to do with the stage of the melanoma and is a poor predictor of your prognosis.
Try to ignore the Clark's level info– it really gives you no useful information.
-
- August 25, 2013 at 6:23 pm
deep shave biopsies can get the whole lesion; your pathology report should either say margins are involved, or margins are clear, or extends close to the margins, etc. . that's how you would know if the depth reported is all of it or if margins were involved. . .etc…
-
- August 25, 2013 at 6:23 pm
deep shave biopsies can get the whole lesion; your pathology report should either say margins are involved, or margins are clear, or extends close to the margins, etc. . that's how you would know if the depth reported is all of it or if margins were involved. . .etc…
-
- August 25, 2013 at 6:23 pm
deep shave biopsies can get the whole lesion; your pathology report should either say margins are involved, or margins are clear, or extends close to the margins, etc. . that's how you would know if the depth reported is all of it or if margins were involved. . .etc…
-
- August 25, 2013 at 11:20 pm
Most shave biopsies will get a .29mm depth lesion. As the other poster stated, the path report would note if the deep margins were involved. Dermal mitosis not present means it was not seen, not that it wasn't checked. They don't just put stuff in the path report unless it is checked. This is called out, and this is used in staging. That means it was checked and found not to be present. This means it is stage IA instead of stage IB.
This is still a very low risk lesion. Nothing has changed.
-
- August 25, 2013 at 11:20 pm
Most shave biopsies will get a .29mm depth lesion. As the other poster stated, the path report would note if the deep margins were involved. Dermal mitosis not present means it was not seen, not that it wasn't checked. They don't just put stuff in the path report unless it is checked. This is called out, and this is used in staging. That means it was checked and found not to be present. This means it is stage IA instead of stage IB.
This is still a very low risk lesion. Nothing has changed.
-
- August 25, 2013 at 11:20 pm
Most shave biopsies will get a .29mm depth lesion. As the other poster stated, the path report would note if the deep margins were involved. Dermal mitosis not present means it was not seen, not that it wasn't checked. They don't just put stuff in the path report unless it is checked. This is called out, and this is used in staging. That means it was checked and found not to be present. This means it is stage IA instead of stage IB.
This is still a very low risk lesion. Nothing has changed.
-
- August 25, 2013 at 11:39 pm
Great news! I’m going next week back to the doctor. After
reading this blog I’m thinking I don’t need to have excision surgery
if I am stage 1. Last week when I was first diagnosed one doctor
told me that I should have excision surgery and have a lymph node
mapping. If I do have lymph mapping and excision surgery, is this an
in office procedure? I talked to a general surgeon last week and he was suggesting these things. This blog leads me to believe that
I can do this surgery in a dermotigist’s office.
Thanks you all are so helpful. I’m so great full that I found this site! -
- August 25, 2013 at 11:39 pm
Great news! I’m going next week back to the doctor. After
reading this blog I’m thinking I don’t need to have excision surgery
if I am stage 1. Last week when I was first diagnosed one doctor
told me that I should have excision surgery and have a lymph node
mapping. If I do have lymph mapping and excision surgery, is this an
in office procedure? I talked to a general surgeon last week and he was suggesting these things. This blog leads me to believe that
I can do this surgery in a dermotigist’s office.
Thanks you all are so helpful. I’m so great full that I found this site! -
- August 25, 2013 at 11:39 pm
Great news! I’m going next week back to the doctor. After
reading this blog I’m thinking I don’t need to have excision surgery
if I am stage 1. Last week when I was first diagnosed one doctor
told me that I should have excision surgery and have a lymph node
mapping. If I do have lymph mapping and excision surgery, is this an
in office procedure? I talked to a general surgeon last week and he was suggesting these things. This blog leads me to believe that
I can do this surgery in a dermotigist’s office.
Thanks you all are so helpful. I’m so great full that I found this site! -
- August 25, 2013 at 11:40 pm
Great news! I’m going next week back to the doctor. After
reading this blog I’m thinking I don’t need to have excision surgery
if I am stage 1. Last week when I was first diagnosed one doctor
told me that I should have excision surgery and have a lymph node
mapping. If I do have lymph mapping and excision surgery, is this an
in office procedure? I talked to a general surgeon last week and he was suggesting these things. This blog leads me to believe that
I can do this surgery in a dermotigist’s office.
Thanks you all are so helpful. I’m so great full that I found this site! -
- August 25, 2013 at 11:40 pm
Great news! I’m going next week back to the doctor. After
reading this blog I’m thinking I don’t need to have excision surgery
if I am stage 1. Last week when I was first diagnosed one doctor
told me that I should have excision surgery and have a lymph node
mapping. If I do have lymph mapping and excision surgery, is this an
in office procedure? I talked to a general surgeon last week and he was suggesting these things. This blog leads me to believe that
I can do this surgery in a dermotigist’s office.
Thanks you all are so helpful. I’m so great full that I found this site! -
- August 25, 2013 at 11:40 pm
Great news! I’m going next week back to the doctor. After
reading this blog I’m thinking I don’t need to have excision surgery
if I am stage 1. Last week when I was first diagnosed one doctor
told me that I should have excision surgery and have a lymph node
mapping. If I do have lymph mapping and excision surgery, is this an
in office procedure? I talked to a general surgeon last week and he was suggesting these things. This blog leads me to believe that
I can do this surgery in a dermotigist’s office.
Thanks you all are so helpful. I’m so great full that I found this site! -
- August 25, 2013 at 11:48 pm
You do not need the lymph node mapping. That isn't done for stage IA. It is a surgical procedure that would be done under general anesthesia in a hospital setting. You DO need the wide excision. This most often is an office procedure. Surgical removal of melanoma is the best treatment. A stage I lesion should have 1cm margins around the primary. Your shave biopsy is unlikely to achieve 1cm margins. Depending upon the dermatologist, they may or may not offer in house procedures. I have had at least 8 WLEs (wide local excisions) and all of mine were done as office procedures. However, others with the same type of lesions have had a surgical procedure. I consider the WLE just an inconvenience done under a local. I would not want one done in the hospital. So if your derm won't do it, another derm or plastic surgeon might. As long as you have no other serious health worries, there is no reason not to have it in an office setting.
-
- August 25, 2013 at 6:02 pm
Thanks all! I’m also concerned because the biopsy was shave biopsy. After reading some of the posts here, I’m thinking
that maybe the .29mm Breslow depth isn’t accurate now. The
path report says dermal mitosis isn’t present, so does that mean it wasn’t checked? Thank you. -
- August 25, 2013 at 6:02 pm
Thanks all! I’m also concerned because the biopsy was shave biopsy. After reading some of the posts here, I’m thinking
that maybe the .29mm Breslow depth isn’t accurate now. The
path report says dermal mitosis isn’t present, so does that mean it wasn’t checked? Thank you. -
- August 25, 2013 at 6:02 pm
Thanks all! I’m also concerned because the biopsy was shave biopsy. After reading some of the posts here, I’m thinking
that maybe the .29mm Breslow depth isn’t accurate now. The
path report says dermal mitosis isn’t present, so does that mean it wasn’t checked? Thank you. -
- August 25, 2013 at 6:03 pm
Thanks all! I’m also concerned because the biopsy was shave biopsy. After reading some of the posts here, I’m thinking
that maybe the .29mm Breslow depth isn’t accurate now. The
path report says dermal mitosis isn’t present, so does that mean it wasn’t checked? Thank you. -
- August 25, 2013 at 6:03 pm
Thanks all! I’m also concerned because the biopsy was shave biopsy. After reading some of the posts here, I’m thinking
that maybe the .29mm Breslow depth isn’t accurate now. The
path report says dermal mitosis isn’t present, so does that mean it wasn’t checked? Thank you. -
- August 25, 2013 at 6:03 pm
Thanks all! I’m also concerned because the biopsy was shave biopsy. After reading some of the posts here, I’m thinking
that maybe the .29mm Breslow depth isn’t accurate now. The
path report says dermal mitosis isn’t present, so does that mean it wasn’t checked? Thank you. -
- August 25, 2013 at 11:48 pm
You do not need the lymph node mapping. That isn't done for stage IA. It is a surgical procedure that would be done under general anesthesia in a hospital setting. You DO need the wide excision. This most often is an office procedure. Surgical removal of melanoma is the best treatment. A stage I lesion should have 1cm margins around the primary. Your shave biopsy is unlikely to achieve 1cm margins. Depending upon the dermatologist, they may or may not offer in house procedures. I have had at least 8 WLEs (wide local excisions) and all of mine were done as office procedures. However, others with the same type of lesions have had a surgical procedure. I consider the WLE just an inconvenience done under a local. I would not want one done in the hospital. So if your derm won't do it, another derm or plastic surgeon might. As long as you have no other serious health worries, there is no reason not to have it in an office setting.
-
- August 25, 2013 at 11:48 pm
You do not need the lymph node mapping. That isn't done for stage IA. It is a surgical procedure that would be done under general anesthesia in a hospital setting. You DO need the wide excision. This most often is an office procedure. Surgical removal of melanoma is the best treatment. A stage I lesion should have 1cm margins around the primary. Your shave biopsy is unlikely to achieve 1cm margins. Depending upon the dermatologist, they may or may not offer in house procedures. I have had at least 8 WLEs (wide local excisions) and all of mine were done as office procedures. However, others with the same type of lesions have had a surgical procedure. I consider the WLE just an inconvenience done under a local. I would not want one done in the hospital. So if your derm won't do it, another derm or plastic surgeon might. As long as you have no other serious health worries, there is no reason not to have it in an office setting.
-
- September 1, 2013 at 3:44 pm
Hi! Last week I went to another dermotologist to get some other suspicious moles on my back biopsied. The original doctor that gave me the melanoma results was a PA and my general doctor suggested I go to a melanoma trained dermatologist. The doctor that I met with last week wanted to have my original pathology report reevualed by a UCSF dermopatologist. Just to be sure that my melanoma diagnoses was correct. The orginal path report was done in Alabama and I live in California. The PA that removed my mole uses this pathology company in Alabama. Anyway, long confusing story. I am now waitiing for the second opinion results from UCSF. I'm assuming it will be the same diagnosis but the waiitng is hard. I did go and see a surgeon last week as well. He said that I would have to have 2cm borders cut around the melanoma and since it's on my back, a SKIN graft. UGH! That sounds a little excessive for a stage 1 melanoma? I'm not sure if any of you had a melanoma on your back and because there isn't much skin back there, a skin graft had to be done. I have 3 more moles that the dermotologist wants to biopsy and the surgeron told me that I should just leave them there. He said it was "overkill" to cut all of these moles off. UGH. This is so confusing. Ironically, I work for a medical device company and train doctors on how to use a breast biopsy needle. I travel for work weekly and I have all these trips to plan for my job. I'm not sure if I can keep working through all of this or not. A skin graft sounds like it will take a long time to heal.
Thanks! ๐
-
- September 1, 2013 at 3:44 pm
Hi! Last week I went to another dermotologist to get some other suspicious moles on my back biopsied. The original doctor that gave me the melanoma results was a PA and my general doctor suggested I go to a melanoma trained dermatologist. The doctor that I met with last week wanted to have my original pathology report reevualed by a UCSF dermopatologist. Just to be sure that my melanoma diagnoses was correct. The orginal path report was done in Alabama and I live in California. The PA that removed my mole uses this pathology company in Alabama. Anyway, long confusing story. I am now waitiing for the second opinion results from UCSF. I'm assuming it will be the same diagnosis but the waiitng is hard. I did go and see a surgeon last week as well. He said that I would have to have 2cm borders cut around the melanoma and since it's on my back, a SKIN graft. UGH! That sounds a little excessive for a stage 1 melanoma? I'm not sure if any of you had a melanoma on your back and because there isn't much skin back there, a skin graft had to be done. I have 3 more moles that the dermotologist wants to biopsy and the surgeron told me that I should just leave them there. He said it was "overkill" to cut all of these moles off. UGH. This is so confusing. Ironically, I work for a medical device company and train doctors on how to use a breast biopsy needle. I travel for work weekly and I have all these trips to plan for my job. I'm not sure if I can keep working through all of this or not. A skin graft sounds like it will take a long time to heal.
Thanks! ๐
-
- September 1, 2013 at 3:44 pm
Hi! Last week I went to another dermotologist to get some other suspicious moles on my back biopsied. The original doctor that gave me the melanoma results was a PA and my general doctor suggested I go to a melanoma trained dermatologist. The doctor that I met with last week wanted to have my original pathology report reevualed by a UCSF dermopatologist. Just to be sure that my melanoma diagnoses was correct. The orginal path report was done in Alabama and I live in California. The PA that removed my mole uses this pathology company in Alabama. Anyway, long confusing story. I am now waitiing for the second opinion results from UCSF. I'm assuming it will be the same diagnosis but the waiitng is hard. I did go and see a surgeon last week as well. He said that I would have to have 2cm borders cut around the melanoma and since it's on my back, a SKIN graft. UGH! That sounds a little excessive for a stage 1 melanoma? I'm not sure if any of you had a melanoma on your back and because there isn't much skin back there, a skin graft had to be done. I have 3 more moles that the dermotologist wants to biopsy and the surgeron told me that I should just leave them there. He said it was "overkill" to cut all of these moles off. UGH. This is so confusing. Ironically, I work for a medical device company and train doctors on how to use a breast biopsy needle. I travel for work weekly and I have all these trips to plan for my job. I'm not sure if I can keep working through all of this or not. A skin graft sounds like it will take a long time to heal.
Thanks! ๐
-
- September 6, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Hi, I wanted to update you all since you have been
so helpful. My current dermatologist wanted a second opinion on
my original path report. We are still waiting for the lesion
to arrive 10 days later. Yesterday they told me that since there were
two lesions cut off of me one at my arm and one at my back. They
are having trouble determining the site location from
the pathology report, therefore they may have to do
two surgeries because they can’t be sure where the positive
lesion is from. There is a possibility that the specimens were
labeled wrong.This is very frustrating to say the least.
-
- September 6, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Hi, I wanted to update you all since you have been
so helpful. My current dermatologist wanted a second opinion on
my original path report. We are still waiting for the lesion
to arrive 10 days later. Yesterday they told me that since there were
two lesions cut off of me one at my arm and one at my back. They
are having trouble determining the site location from
the pathology report, therefore they may have to do
two surgeries because they can’t be sure where the positive
lesion is from. There is a possibility that the specimens were
labeled wrong.This is very frustrating to say the least.
-
- September 6, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Hi, I wanted to update you all since you have been
so helpful. My current dermatologist wanted a second opinion on
my original path report. We are still waiting for the lesion
to arrive 10 days later. Yesterday they told me that since there were
two lesions cut off of me one at my arm and one at my back. They
are having trouble determining the site location from
the pathology report, therefore they may have to do
two surgeries because they can’t be sure where the positive
lesion is from. There is a possibility that the specimens were
labeled wrong.This is very frustrating to say the least.
-
- September 6, 2013 at 12:57 pm
Hi, I wanted to update you all since you have been
so helpful. My current dermatologist wanted a second opinion on
my original path report. We are still waiting for the lesion
to arrive 10 days later. Yesterday they told me that since there were
two lesions cut off of me one at my arm and one at my back. They
are having trouble determining the site location from
the pathology report, therefore they may have to do
two surgeries because they can’t be sure where the positive
lesion is from. There is a possibility that the specimens were
labeled wrong.This is very frustrating to say the least.
-
- September 6, 2013 at 12:57 pm
Hi, I wanted to update you all since you have been
so helpful. My current dermatologist wanted a second opinion on
my original path report. We are still waiting for the lesion
to arrive 10 days later. Yesterday they told me that since there were
two lesions cut off of me one at my arm and one at my back. They
are having trouble determining the site location from
the pathology report, therefore they may have to do
two surgeries because they can’t be sure where the positive
lesion is from. There is a possibility that the specimens were
labeled wrong.This is very frustrating to say the least.
-
- September 6, 2013 at 12:57 pm
Hi, I wanted to update you all since you have been
so helpful. My current dermatologist wanted a second opinion on
my original path report. We are still waiting for the lesion
to arrive 10 days later. Yesterday they told me that since there were
two lesions cut off of me one at my arm and one at my back. They
are having trouble determining the site location from
the pathology report, therefore they may have to do
two surgeries because they can’t be sure where the positive
lesion is from. There is a possibility that the specimens were
labeled wrong.This is very frustrating to say the least.
-
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.