› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Clinical Trials for Melanoma: Your Input Needed
- This topic has 9 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 3 months ago by
aldakota22.
- Post
-
- January 26, 2013 at 3:29 pm
I am a Stage IV melaonoma survivor and melanoma activist. I have been invited to participate in the Patient-Centered Clinical Trial Summit at the Partnership in Clinical Trials Conference. This gives me a unique opportunity to present a patient perspective to key stakeholders in Pharma, the CRO industry and the regulatory community. I am looking for additional patient input concerning the design, conduct, financing and analysis of clinical trials as well as the regulatory process.
I am a Stage IV melaonoma survivor and melanoma activist. I have been invited to participate in the Patient-Centered Clinical Trial Summit at the Partnership in Clinical Trials Conference. This gives me a unique opportunity to present a patient perspective to key stakeholders in Pharma, the CRO industry and the regulatory community. I am looking for additional patient input concerning the design, conduct, financing and analysis of clinical trials as well as the regulatory process.
The entire Translational Research Model in the US and internationally is under scrutiny by groups at home and abroad. ( see for example: the Conference on Clinical Care Research sponsored by the Friends of Cancer Research in November of 2012). We are close to significant changes in how our FDA will regulate Breakthrough Therapies under PDFUA 5. However, the international picture is not as good: requirements for approval such as endpoint selection, randomization, comparator arms, use of placebos, and etc. are all based on antiquated notions of what constiutes scientific proof. They treat all diseases alike, they were designed to evaluate synthetic chemical treatments. They do not recognize that critical diseases like metastatic melanoma require a different approach to clinical trials because too many people are dying and because new targeted and immunologic therapies may not yet cure but have higher response rates, more durable responses, more tolerability and more practical benefits than the Starndard of Care. With the globalization of the pharmeceutical marketplace and the globilization of clinical trials to reduce costs and problems of patient recruitment, the problem of differential standards has been exacerbated. I intend to use as an example the recently announced BMS Phase 3 trial NCT01721772) of anti-PD-1 (BMS-036558). It is the breakthrough therapy that saved my life (Extended 1B Trial) and an excellent example of the need to change regulatory practices and trial design now. As I am fond of saying , we need anti-PD-1 and we need it now! If we want participatory medicine, we must participate not only at the level of personal choice but at the policy level.
As I prepare my thoughts, I need to know yours. You may respond here or to me directly at [email protected] if you desire your comments to be kept private.
Alan
- Replies
-
-
- January 26, 2013 at 4:10 pm
Being new to melanoma, I don't have anything very useful to suggest. Hopefully others will. This is important. Thank you for doing it.
But I do have a question that comes out of my experience with other clinical research, and that has do with who will be attending this meeting. Funding agencies such as NIH did not seem to be on your list of attendees, or maybe they were included in "regulatory agencies?"
Here is a link that has a section on who funds clinical research:
http://www.centerwatch.com/clinical-trials/overview.aspx
NIH trials on melanoma:
http://bethesdatrials.cancer.gov/melanoma/index.aspx
Even if NIH does not currently have a lot of trials in this area, they are the chief public funder of research in this country, so having input there is important. Maybe that is a separate area from what you are doing now?
-
- January 26, 2013 at 4:10 pm
Being new to melanoma, I don't have anything very useful to suggest. Hopefully others will. This is important. Thank you for doing it.
But I do have a question that comes out of my experience with other clinical research, and that has do with who will be attending this meeting. Funding agencies such as NIH did not seem to be on your list of attendees, or maybe they were included in "regulatory agencies?"
Here is a link that has a section on who funds clinical research:
http://www.centerwatch.com/clinical-trials/overview.aspx
NIH trials on melanoma:
http://bethesdatrials.cancer.gov/melanoma/index.aspx
Even if NIH does not currently have a lot of trials in this area, they are the chief public funder of research in this country, so having input there is important. Maybe that is a separate area from what you are doing now?
-
- January 26, 2013 at 4:19 pm
Seems like the translational people at NIH ought to be involved:
-
- January 26, 2013 at 4:19 pm
Seems like the translational people at NIH ought to be involved:
-
- January 26, 2013 at 4:19 pm
Seems like the translational people at NIH ought to be involved:
-
- January 26, 2013 at 4:10 pm
Being new to melanoma, I don't have anything very useful to suggest. Hopefully others will. This is important. Thank you for doing it.
But I do have a question that comes out of my experience with other clinical research, and that has do with who will be attending this meeting. Funding agencies such as NIH did not seem to be on your list of attendees, or maybe they were included in "regulatory agencies?"
Here is a link that has a section on who funds clinical research:
http://www.centerwatch.com/clinical-trials/overview.aspx
NIH trials on melanoma:
http://bethesdatrials.cancer.gov/melanoma/index.aspx
Even if NIH does not currently have a lot of trials in this area, they are the chief public funder of research in this country, so having input there is important. Maybe that is a separate area from what you are doing now?
-
- January 26, 2013 at 4:50 pm
Yes you are so right on many points.The old way of doing buisness is no longer efficient.With a global approach to research and trials a more joint effort by all parties involved is needed.People can not wait to get life saving drugs.Timei s something we they can ill afford to waste.Everyday that potential breakthrough is held up someone needlessly dies.They can"t wait till tomorrow when they need answers yesterday.Beat the Beast. Al
-
- January 26, 2013 at 4:50 pm
Yes you are so right on many points.The old way of doing buisness is no longer efficient.With a global approach to research and trials a more joint effort by all parties involved is needed.People can not wait to get life saving drugs.Timei s something we they can ill afford to waste.Everyday that potential breakthrough is held up someone needlessly dies.They can"t wait till tomorrow when they need answers yesterday.Beat the Beast. Al
-
- January 26, 2013 at 4:50 pm
Yes you are so right on many points.The old way of doing buisness is no longer efficient.With a global approach to research and trials a more joint effort by all parties involved is needed.People can not wait to get life saving drugs.Timei s something we they can ill afford to waste.Everyday that potential breakthrough is held up someone needlessly dies.They can"t wait till tomorrow when they need answers yesterday.Beat the Beast. Al
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.