› Forums › General Melanoma Community › CLND do or don’t do??
- This topic has 108 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 9 months ago by
slh4448.
- Post
-
- July 5, 2016 at 12:16 pm
Good morning – Recently diagnosed and I am stage 3c WLE and sentinel node biopsy done (node positive) PET/CT scans negative. They are talking about doing a CLND; which I don't want to do. Reasons: #1 complications (if the nodes come back negative I would have to live with the side effects of the surgery) #2 there are probably cells already circulating in my body #3 some literature say it doesn't improve outcomes. I'm going to Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa for second opinion. Has anyone else decided not to do it? Any feelings, ideas, suggestions?? I would appreciate any and all feedback. Thank you
Patti
- Replies
-
-
- July 5, 2016 at 1:27 pm
Yes, I chose not to do it because I am too active. I watched some webinars on melanomaforum.org too. I am followed with ultrasound of the nodes every few months. Works for me!
-
- August 3, 2016 at 8:53 pm
Hi, just curious what your stage is and where your clnd would've been done had you gone forward with it? Are you on any kind of therapy? I am having many many thoughts about not doing it either. Thinking about going on ipi and ultrasounds of the nodes like you. Can you help me better understand your decision?
Thanks,
-
- August 3, 2016 at 8:53 pm
Hi, just curious what your stage is and where your clnd would've been done had you gone forward with it? Are you on any kind of therapy? I am having many many thoughts about not doing it either. Thinking about going on ipi and ultrasounds of the nodes like you. Can you help me better understand your decision?
Thanks,
-
- August 3, 2016 at 8:53 pm
Hi, just curious what your stage is and where your clnd would've been done had you gone forward with it? Are you on any kind of therapy? I am having many many thoughts about not doing it either. Thinking about going on ipi and ultrasounds of the nodes like you. Can you help me better understand your decision?
Thanks,
-
- July 5, 2016 at 1:42 pm
Hello Patti,
My husband decided not to do it. His was not in the lymph nodes when they did the SNB. It is no guarantee that it will help and he was also Stage 3C.
Judy (loving wife of Gene Stage IV and now NED for over 3.5 years.
-
- July 5, 2016 at 3:16 pm
Hi Patti. I, like you, am stage 3C and refused the CLND at first. Then, 8 months later I had an in-transit melanoma pop up on my leg near the original melanoma at the exact same time that a lymph node became enlarged and hardened in my groin. I knew then that I needed the CLND. I had 8 out of 30 nodes come back positive, 2 labeled “grossly positive” on path report, none of which lit up on the PET scan. It is a very personal choice, and more and more literature is coming out to help guide your decision. It is a big procedure, so if you aren’t sure, then wait. But don’t avoid the surgery just because of the complications. Just like immunotherapy, you can’t predict the complications before they happen because everyone is different. I do have lymphedema, but it’s completely manageable and I don’t really think much of it these days. If anything is holding me back physically, it’s the side effects from immunotherapy rather than lymphedema. Definitely get a second opinion, gather as much info as you can, and do what’s best for YOU.Wishing you all the best!!
Lauren -
- July 5, 2016 at 3:16 pm
Hi Patti. I, like you, am stage 3C and refused the CLND at first. Then, 8 months later I had an in-transit melanoma pop up on my leg near the original melanoma at the exact same time that a lymph node became enlarged and hardened in my groin. I knew then that I needed the CLND. I had 8 out of 30 nodes come back positive, 2 labeled “grossly positive” on path report, none of which lit up on the PET scan. It is a very personal choice, and more and more literature is coming out to help guide your decision. It is a big procedure, so if you aren’t sure, then wait. But don’t avoid the surgery just because of the complications. Just like immunotherapy, you can’t predict the complications before they happen because everyone is different. I do have lymphedema, but it’s completely manageable and I don’t really think much of it these days. If anything is holding me back physically, it’s the side effects from immunotherapy rather than lymphedema. Definitely get a second opinion, gather as much info as you can, and do what’s best for YOU.Wishing you all the best!!
Lauren -
- July 5, 2016 at 3:16 pm
Hi Patti. I, like you, am stage 3C and refused the CLND at first. Then, 8 months later I had an in-transit melanoma pop up on my leg near the original melanoma at the exact same time that a lymph node became enlarged and hardened in my groin. I knew then that I needed the CLND. I had 8 out of 30 nodes come back positive, 2 labeled “grossly positive” on path report, none of which lit up on the PET scan. It is a very personal choice, and more and more literature is coming out to help guide your decision. It is a big procedure, so if you aren’t sure, then wait. But don’t avoid the surgery just because of the complications. Just like immunotherapy, you can’t predict the complications before they happen because everyone is different. I do have lymphedema, but it’s completely manageable and I don’t really think much of it these days. If anything is holding me back physically, it’s the side effects from immunotherapy rather than lymphedema. Definitely get a second opinion, gather as much info as you can, and do what’s best for YOU.Wishing you all the best!!
Lauren -
- July 5, 2016 at 3:20 pm
I am leaning towards not going through the procedure, but only if you get some kind of immunotherapy…
My father had a positive sentinel node, all other nodes were negative (he did the surgery)… But his mel came back 3 years later, so don't really see the point in taking them out…
all best to you!
Patrisa
-
- July 5, 2016 at 3:20 pm
I am leaning towards not going through the procedure, but only if you get some kind of immunotherapy…
My father had a positive sentinel node, all other nodes were negative (he did the surgery)… But his mel came back 3 years later, so don't really see the point in taking them out…
all best to you!
Patrisa
-
- July 5, 2016 at 3:20 pm
I am leaning towards not going through the procedure, but only if you get some kind of immunotherapy…
My father had a positive sentinel node, all other nodes were negative (he did the surgery)… But his mel came back 3 years later, so don't really see the point in taking them out…
all best to you!
Patrisa
-
- July 5, 2016 at 3:30 pm
I also did not do the CLND. I was not even given the option, where I get treated they don't do many of those anymore. But, I would not have chosen it anyway. It comes down to a personal choice, whatever you are most comfortable with. If you plan on doing treatment, like Ipi or a trial, then in my opinion it doesn't seem totally worth the trouble and possible complications to do the CLND.
-
- July 5, 2016 at 3:30 pm
I also did not do the CLND. I was not even given the option, where I get treated they don't do many of those anymore. But, I would not have chosen it anyway. It comes down to a personal choice, whatever you are most comfortable with. If you plan on doing treatment, like Ipi or a trial, then in my opinion it doesn't seem totally worth the trouble and possible complications to do the CLND.
-
- July 5, 2016 at 3:30 pm
I also did not do the CLND. I was not even given the option, where I get treated they don't do many of those anymore. But, I would not have chosen it anyway. It comes down to a personal choice, whatever you are most comfortable with. If you plan on doing treatment, like Ipi or a trial, then in my opinion it doesn't seem totally worth the trouble and possible complications to do the CLND.
-
- July 5, 2016 at 4:07 pm
Elisabeth Camaur founded Camaur Crampton Family Law as a resource to help clients through divorce and child custody turmoil with a focus on the future. “Instead of regretfully looking back and affixing blame, I like to look forward.
-
- July 5, 2016 at 4:07 pm
Elisabeth Camaur founded Camaur Crampton Family Law as a resource to help clients through divorce and child custody turmoil with a focus on the future. “Instead of regretfully looking back and affixing blame, I like to look forward.
-
- July 5, 2016 at 4:07 pm
Elisabeth Camaur founded Camaur Crampton Family Law as a resource to help clients through divorce and child custody turmoil with a focus on the future. “Instead of regretfully looking back and affixing blame, I like to look forward.
-
- July 6, 2016 at 12:20 pm
Thank you Jenn. I went to Moffitt and given four options: 1) high dose Interferon, 2) low dose Interferon, 3) ipi (not recommended because of my IBS), 4) trial with high dose Interferon or Ipi to Pembrolizumab but I would need to get a CLND done. Right now I'm deciding to do nothing and hope I'm one of the 60% and not the 40% of reoccuring.
Thank you again,
Patti
-
- July 6, 2016 at 12:20 pm
Thank you Jenn. I went to Moffitt and given four options: 1) high dose Interferon, 2) low dose Interferon, 3) ipi (not recommended because of my IBS), 4) trial with high dose Interferon or Ipi to Pembrolizumab but I would need to get a CLND done. Right now I'm deciding to do nothing and hope I'm one of the 60% and not the 40% of reoccuring.
Thank you again,
Patti
-
- July 6, 2016 at 12:20 pm
Thank you Jenn. I went to Moffitt and given four options: 1) high dose Interferon, 2) low dose Interferon, 3) ipi (not recommended because of my IBS), 4) trial with high dose Interferon or Ipi to Pembrolizumab but I would need to get a CLND done. Right now I'm deciding to do nothing and hope I'm one of the 60% and not the 40% of reoccuring.
Thank you again,
Patti
-
- July 5, 2016 at 6:30 pm
Hi Chance16,
I had a CLND of the armpit after 3 nodes came back positive from the SNB at Moffitt. I have had almost no issues from the CLND and I am an avid cyclist and racer. Good luck… Moffitt is a great place.
Juan
-
- July 5, 2016 at 7:53 pm
I had to quit working from the CLND and it did not prevent the melanoma from coming back. I don't think it has been proven to prevent it because melanoma also travels int he bloodstream besides the lymph nodes. I can't travel either without huge issues of swelling.
-
- July 5, 2016 at 7:53 pm
I had to quit working from the CLND and it did not prevent the melanoma from coming back. I don't think it has been proven to prevent it because melanoma also travels int he bloodstream besides the lymph nodes. I can't travel either without huge issues of swelling.
-
- July 5, 2016 at 7:53 pm
I had to quit working from the CLND and it did not prevent the melanoma from coming back. I don't think it has been proven to prevent it because melanoma also travels int he bloodstream besides the lymph nodes. I can't travel either without huge issues of swelling.
-
- July 5, 2016 at 9:56 pm
Hi Patti,
As noted above by Patrisa, an axilla CLND appears to be less problematic than the groin dissection. Mine were removed from axilla with nine coming back positive, but in hindsight, I doubt if it mattered because soon after a large sub-q popped up on my back, where neck meets shoulder and I was declared stage IV at that point anyway. I have had no complications at all and negligible lymphedema. It appears best current advice leans toward not doing the CLND as long as you immediately start on ipi as the preferred aggressive approach for Stage III.
Gary
-
- July 6, 2016 at 12:26 pm
Thank you Gary. This is why Im having concerns; mine would be the groin and I have other vascular issues. My onc at Moffitt is recommending high dose Interferon instead of Ipi (for 2 reasons: Ipi study results not in until 2017 and I have IBS; so concerns about colitis. All too confusing!! I'm at the point of doing nothing.
Thank you again,
Patti
-
- July 6, 2016 at 5:24 pm
Hi Patti, I am sure many of us are scratching their heads when hearing that Moffitt, a top melanoma center is still recommending interferon. It appears that treatment, with its limited effectiveness combined with awful side-effects is just something from the past not worth revisiting, but I am not one to second guess experts. That said, has an approach been considered of going on steroids as a preventative measure, and doing the ipi? My doc actually did this and I flew through ipi virtually unaffected although that was the lower dose.
Just a thought. Best to you in the battle.
Gary
-
- July 6, 2016 at 5:24 pm
Hi Patti, I am sure many of us are scratching their heads when hearing that Moffitt, a top melanoma center is still recommending interferon. It appears that treatment, with its limited effectiveness combined with awful side-effects is just something from the past not worth revisiting, but I am not one to second guess experts. That said, has an approach been considered of going on steroids as a preventative measure, and doing the ipi? My doc actually did this and I flew through ipi virtually unaffected although that was the lower dose.
Just a thought. Best to you in the battle.
Gary
-
- July 6, 2016 at 5:24 pm
Hi Patti, I am sure many of us are scratching their heads when hearing that Moffitt, a top melanoma center is still recommending interferon. It appears that treatment, with its limited effectiveness combined with awful side-effects is just something from the past not worth revisiting, but I am not one to second guess experts. That said, has an approach been considered of going on steroids as a preventative measure, and doing the ipi? My doc actually did this and I flew through ipi virtually unaffected although that was the lower dose.
Just a thought. Best to you in the battle.
Gary
-
- July 6, 2016 at 6:21 pm
Have to agree with Gary!! But also always have to qualify to say i'm not the patient and have no medical background either. Can tell you that when my sister was diagnosed as 3c last year, they offered Interferon but stated emphatically that the odds of it doing any good were only 4% – limited indeed – one would think chance alone would give better odds!! That plus the fact that she likely would've faced a year of being very ill, she opted not to.
Best wishes to you!!!
Barb
-
- July 6, 2016 at 6:21 pm
Have to agree with Gary!! But also always have to qualify to say i'm not the patient and have no medical background either. Can tell you that when my sister was diagnosed as 3c last year, they offered Interferon but stated emphatically that the odds of it doing any good were only 4% – limited indeed – one would think chance alone would give better odds!! That plus the fact that she likely would've faced a year of being very ill, she opted not to.
Best wishes to you!!!
Barb
-
- July 6, 2016 at 6:21 pm
Have to agree with Gary!! But also always have to qualify to say i'm not the patient and have no medical background either. Can tell you that when my sister was diagnosed as 3c last year, they offered Interferon but stated emphatically that the odds of it doing any good were only 4% – limited indeed – one would think chance alone would give better odds!! That plus the fact that she likely would've faced a year of being very ill, she opted not to.
Best wishes to you!!!
Barb
-
- July 7, 2016 at 4:08 pm
Interferon and Ipi do not have the same percentage outcome. Because all of the data is not out yet for Ipi since it's only been a short time that it has been available in the adjuvant setting, it is hard to give hard percentage facts just yet. But, looking at the amount of people it has helped for stage 4 patients, since it has been available to them for some years now, it's certainly better than what Interferon has ever done. But, toxicity is a factor.. for both of them. Interferon, to me, sounds way worse since you're forced to have the flu for a whole year. With Ipi, no side effect is a given, some get a few, some get a lot, some get nearly none. And, it's a much shorter period of time to go through if you just do the 4 main doses.
Just wanted to clear that up a little, hope that made some sense 🙂
Watch and wait is still a very good option, and totally worth doing if it doesn't bring you much anxiety to skip treatment.
-
- July 8, 2016 at 2:22 am
Once again thank you Jenn – however right now I'm freaking out because I have a very small reddish brown spot on my shoulder and it is itching – I don't remember if it was there before or not – it doesn't look like any of the pictures on this site – I hope I can remain sane through this!
Patti
-
- July 8, 2016 at 2:22 am
Once again thank you Jenn – however right now I'm freaking out because I have a very small reddish brown spot on my shoulder and it is itching – I don't remember if it was there before or not – it doesn't look like any of the pictures on this site – I hope I can remain sane through this!
Patti
-
- July 8, 2016 at 2:22 am
Once again thank you Jenn – however right now I'm freaking out because I have a very small reddish brown spot on my shoulder and it is itching – I don't remember if it was there before or not – it doesn't look like any of the pictures on this site – I hope I can remain sane through this!
Patti
-
- July 8, 2016 at 4:34 am
I became an obsessive skin checker after my diagnosis. I have calmed down a bit since knowing that getting a second primary is not all that common. Have your derm check out that spot and see what they say about it. I feel like the definition of sane has changed for me a lot since my diagnosis 🙂
-
- July 8, 2016 at 4:34 am
I became an obsessive skin checker after my diagnosis. I have calmed down a bit since knowing that getting a second primary is not all that common. Have your derm check out that spot and see what they say about it. I feel like the definition of sane has changed for me a lot since my diagnosis 🙂
-
- July 8, 2016 at 4:34 am
I became an obsessive skin checker after my diagnosis. I have calmed down a bit since knowing that getting a second primary is not all that common. Have your derm check out that spot and see what they say about it. I feel like the definition of sane has changed for me a lot since my diagnosis 🙂
-
- July 7, 2016 at 4:08 pm
Interferon and Ipi do not have the same percentage outcome. Because all of the data is not out yet for Ipi since it's only been a short time that it has been available in the adjuvant setting, it is hard to give hard percentage facts just yet. But, looking at the amount of people it has helped for stage 4 patients, since it has been available to them for some years now, it's certainly better than what Interferon has ever done. But, toxicity is a factor.. for both of them. Interferon, to me, sounds way worse since you're forced to have the flu for a whole year. With Ipi, no side effect is a given, some get a few, some get a lot, some get nearly none. And, it's a much shorter period of time to go through if you just do the 4 main doses.
Just wanted to clear that up a little, hope that made some sense 🙂
Watch and wait is still a very good option, and totally worth doing if it doesn't bring you much anxiety to skip treatment.
-
- July 7, 2016 at 4:08 pm
Interferon and Ipi do not have the same percentage outcome. Because all of the data is not out yet for Ipi since it's only been a short time that it has been available in the adjuvant setting, it is hard to give hard percentage facts just yet. But, looking at the amount of people it has helped for stage 4 patients, since it has been available to them for some years now, it's certainly better than what Interferon has ever done. But, toxicity is a factor.. for both of them. Interferon, to me, sounds way worse since you're forced to have the flu for a whole year. With Ipi, no side effect is a given, some get a few, some get a lot, some get nearly none. And, it's a much shorter period of time to go through if you just do the 4 main doses.
Just wanted to clear that up a little, hope that made some sense 🙂
Watch and wait is still a very good option, and totally worth doing if it doesn't bring you much anxiety to skip treatment.
-
- July 6, 2016 at 12:26 pm
Thank you Gary. This is why Im having concerns; mine would be the groin and I have other vascular issues. My onc at Moffitt is recommending high dose Interferon instead of Ipi (for 2 reasons: Ipi study results not in until 2017 and I have IBS; so concerns about colitis. All too confusing!! I'm at the point of doing nothing.
Thank you again,
Patti
-
- July 6, 2016 at 12:26 pm
Thank you Gary. This is why Im having concerns; mine would be the groin and I have other vascular issues. My onc at Moffitt is recommending high dose Interferon instead of Ipi (for 2 reasons: Ipi study results not in until 2017 and I have IBS; so concerns about colitis. All too confusing!! I'm at the point of doing nothing.
Thank you again,
Patti
-
- July 5, 2016 at 9:56 pm
Hi Patti,
As noted above by Patrisa, an axilla CLND appears to be less problematic than the groin dissection. Mine were removed from axilla with nine coming back positive, but in hindsight, I doubt if it mattered because soon after a large sub-q popped up on my back, where neck meets shoulder and I was declared stage IV at that point anyway. I have had no complications at all and negligible lymphedema. It appears best current advice leans toward not doing the CLND as long as you immediately start on ipi as the preferred aggressive approach for Stage III.
Gary
-
- July 5, 2016 at 9:56 pm
Hi Patti,
As noted above by Patrisa, an axilla CLND appears to be less problematic than the groin dissection. Mine were removed from axilla with nine coming back positive, but in hindsight, I doubt if it mattered because soon after a large sub-q popped up on my back, where neck meets shoulder and I was declared stage IV at that point anyway. I have had no complications at all and negligible lymphedema. It appears best current advice leans toward not doing the CLND as long as you immediately start on ipi as the preferred aggressive approach for Stage III.
Gary
-
- July 6, 2016 at 12:45 am
Hi!
I had the choice of a CLND (left groin) or ultra sound 4 1/2 years ago.. I opted for the surgery. As others have said, it should be governed by what you feel is best based reviewing pertinent information and feedback from your medical team. . Other than a bit of a post op infection (one week on IV antibiotics) and a little bit of an extended time with the JP bulbs, I've had no complications. I wore the compression stocking for abt 6 months and haven't worn them since. I have had no swelling. Occassionally my left ankle will get slightly swollen. During those rare times, it's back to normal the next morning. Physically, I can still run, play racvquetball, hike, walk – all with no issues.
I have not had any recurrences, and slso had no other positive nodes after my SLNB. Who knows what part the surgery played, but so far so good.
Again, as others have mentioned, the view of the efficacy of the CLND is evolving. Good luck with your decision!
Stan
-
- July 6, 2016 at 12:45 am
Hi!
I had the choice of a CLND (left groin) or ultra sound 4 1/2 years ago.. I opted for the surgery. As others have said, it should be governed by what you feel is best based reviewing pertinent information and feedback from your medical team. . Other than a bit of a post op infection (one week on IV antibiotics) and a little bit of an extended time with the JP bulbs, I've had no complications. I wore the compression stocking for abt 6 months and haven't worn them since. I have had no swelling. Occassionally my left ankle will get slightly swollen. During those rare times, it's back to normal the next morning. Physically, I can still run, play racvquetball, hike, walk – all with no issues.
I have not had any recurrences, and slso had no other positive nodes after my SLNB. Who knows what part the surgery played, but so far so good.
Again, as others have mentioned, the view of the efficacy of the CLND is evolving. Good luck with your decision!
Stan
-
- July 6, 2016 at 12:45 am
Hi!
I had the choice of a CLND (left groin) or ultra sound 4 1/2 years ago.. I opted for the surgery. As others have said, it should be governed by what you feel is best based reviewing pertinent information and feedback from your medical team. . Other than a bit of a post op infection (one week on IV antibiotics) and a little bit of an extended time with the JP bulbs, I've had no complications. I wore the compression stocking for abt 6 months and haven't worn them since. I have had no swelling. Occassionally my left ankle will get slightly swollen. During those rare times, it's back to normal the next morning. Physically, I can still run, play racvquetball, hike, walk – all with no issues.
I have not had any recurrences, and slso had no other positive nodes after my SLNB. Who knows what part the surgery played, but so far so good.
Again, as others have mentioned, the view of the efficacy of the CLND is evolving. Good luck with your decision!
Stan
-
- July 6, 2016 at 2:44 am
Here's some of the very latest data that helps point the direction of possibly who should and who shouldn't….you be the judge: http://chaoticallypreciselifeloveandmelanoma.blogspot.com/2016/02/patients-wtih-microscopically.html
I wish you well. Celeste
-
- July 6, 2016 at 2:44 am
Here's some of the very latest data that helps point the direction of possibly who should and who shouldn't….you be the judge: http://chaoticallypreciselifeloveandmelanoma.blogspot.com/2016/02/patients-wtih-microscopically.html
I wish you well. Celeste
-
- July 6, 2016 at 2:44 am
Here's some of the very latest data that helps point the direction of possibly who should and who shouldn't….you be the judge: http://chaoticallypreciselifeloveandmelanoma.blogspot.com/2016/02/patients-wtih-microscopically.html
I wish you well. Celeste
-
- July 6, 2016 at 4:51 am
Another thought….
It is always said, that the best option (if possible) to treat melanoma is surgery, so maaaybe getting the potentialy infected lymph nodes out and then doing imunotherapy is a way to go…
I'm not sure though… Just a thought…
love,
Patrisa
-
- July 6, 2016 at 4:51 am
Another thought….
It is always said, that the best option (if possible) to treat melanoma is surgery, so maaaybe getting the potentialy infected lymph nodes out and then doing imunotherapy is a way to go…
I'm not sure though… Just a thought…
love,
Patrisa
-
- July 6, 2016 at 4:51 am
Another thought….
It is always said, that the best option (if possible) to treat melanoma is surgery, so maaaybe getting the potentialy infected lymph nodes out and then doing imunotherapy is a way to go…
I'm not sure though… Just a thought…
love,
Patrisa
-
- July 6, 2016 at 6:05 am
I did not do it for other reasons – I am phobic of hospitals and doctors. I was definitely stage 3C. We could telll from the scans There were two sizeable tumours in my right armpit. My wonderful melanoma specialist had me classified as 'non-resectable' and I went straight for Ipi. Then, luckily, I was a responder.
I did look at all the data before they decided that I was never going to agree to the surgery. My logical side was not convinced. I think it is interesting that some melanoma treatment teams are moving towards monitoring lymph nodes using ultrasound.
-
- July 6, 2016 at 10:12 pm
You may get different options seeing another doctor, but those would probably only be clinical trials. Interferon or IPI currently are the ONLY treatments FDA approved for stage III. So unless you particiapte in a clinical trial, that's about all you would get from any doctor. Not supporting Moffit per se because I'm not a fan of Interferon, but there is only so much they can offer. MDA might offer biochemotherapy but that is very hard and doesn't exactly have great stats either. Most clinical trials will require you to have the CLND as that has been the standard of care for many years now. Until everyone accepts that is not a beneficial procedure, it will most likely continue to be a requirement for clinical trials – just so you are aware. It may disqualify you in the future for trials.
Get another opinion – it may make you feel better. But don't expect the option to be different. The recommendation may be different, but the options are still limited.
-
- July 6, 2016 at 10:12 pm
You may get different options seeing another doctor, but those would probably only be clinical trials. Interferon or IPI currently are the ONLY treatments FDA approved for stage III. So unless you particiapte in a clinical trial, that's about all you would get from any doctor. Not supporting Moffit per se because I'm not a fan of Interferon, but there is only so much they can offer. MDA might offer biochemotherapy but that is very hard and doesn't exactly have great stats either. Most clinical trials will require you to have the CLND as that has been the standard of care for many years now. Until everyone accepts that is not a beneficial procedure, it will most likely continue to be a requirement for clinical trials – just so you are aware. It may disqualify you in the future for trials.
Get another opinion – it may make you feel better. But don't expect the option to be different. The recommendation may be different, but the options are still limited.
-
- July 6, 2016 at 10:12 pm
You may get different options seeing another doctor, but those would probably only be clinical trials. Interferon or IPI currently are the ONLY treatments FDA approved for stage III. So unless you particiapte in a clinical trial, that's about all you would get from any doctor. Not supporting Moffit per se because I'm not a fan of Interferon, but there is only so much they can offer. MDA might offer biochemotherapy but that is very hard and doesn't exactly have great stats either. Most clinical trials will require you to have the CLND as that has been the standard of care for many years now. Until everyone accepts that is not a beneficial procedure, it will most likely continue to be a requirement for clinical trials – just so you are aware. It may disqualify you in the future for trials.
Get another opinion – it may make you feel better. But don't expect the option to be different. The recommendation may be different, but the options are still limited.
-
- July 6, 2016 at 6:05 am
I did not do it for other reasons – I am phobic of hospitals and doctors. I was definitely stage 3C. We could telll from the scans There were two sizeable tumours in my right armpit. My wonderful melanoma specialist had me classified as 'non-resectable' and I went straight for Ipi. Then, luckily, I was a responder.
I did look at all the data before they decided that I was never going to agree to the surgery. My logical side was not convinced. I think it is interesting that some melanoma treatment teams are moving towards monitoring lymph nodes using ultrasound.
-
- July 6, 2016 at 6:05 am
I did not do it for other reasons – I am phobic of hospitals and doctors. I was definitely stage 3C. We could telll from the scans There were two sizeable tumours in my right armpit. My wonderful melanoma specialist had me classified as 'non-resectable' and I went straight for Ipi. Then, luckily, I was a responder.
I did look at all the data before they decided that I was never going to agree to the surgery. My logical side was not convinced. I think it is interesting that some melanoma treatment teams are moving towards monitoring lymph nodes using ultrasound.
-
- July 7, 2016 at 12:15 am
You need to be OK with the treatment path you are on. If this means getting other opinions, it may be best to pause and do just that.
No one can tell you what decisions to make, whether that person is on here or a doctor. They are your decisions.
From your original post, you do not want to do the CLND. This is not an unreasonable decision. If you present the prospect of this decision to the medical team, what do they say?
My phobia means that I had a lot of experience of doctors when faced with a patient saying no. Some cope brilliantly. Others just stare at you as if they haven't got a clue what to do.
It was such a relief when I met my melanoma specialist, who treated me rather than my melanoma or my phobia.
-
- July 7, 2016 at 12:15 am
You need to be OK with the treatment path you are on. If this means getting other opinions, it may be best to pause and do just that.
No one can tell you what decisions to make, whether that person is on here or a doctor. They are your decisions.
From your original post, you do not want to do the CLND. This is not an unreasonable decision. If you present the prospect of this decision to the medical team, what do they say?
My phobia means that I had a lot of experience of doctors when faced with a patient saying no. Some cope brilliantly. Others just stare at you as if they haven't got a clue what to do.
It was such a relief when I met my melanoma specialist, who treated me rather than my melanoma or my phobia.
-
- July 7, 2016 at 12:15 am
You need to be OK with the treatment path you are on. If this means getting other opinions, it may be best to pause and do just that.
No one can tell you what decisions to make, whether that person is on here or a doctor. They are your decisions.
From your original post, you do not want to do the CLND. This is not an unreasonable decision. If you present the prospect of this decision to the medical team, what do they say?
My phobia means that I had a lot of experience of doctors when faced with a patient saying no. Some cope brilliantly. Others just stare at you as if they haven't got a clue what to do.
It was such a relief when I met my melanoma specialist, who treated me rather than my melanoma or my phobia.
-
- July 27, 2016 at 3:13 pm
Hello all,
So I just wanted to ask the question….Is there a need to have a CLND? I guess conventional wisdom says yes, but I very curious. I came across some results from a phase III study presented last year in May at the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting in Chicago entitled "No need for Lymph Node Dissection in Certain Melanoma Patients".
Basically saying that a CLND for people with MICROmetastatic cutaneous melanoma following a positive SLNB "may" not be necessary. So after my SLNB, my pathology report states that I am MICRO and not MACRO!
In the paper it states that "a potential improvement in survival is only one reason that a patient could be recommended to undergo a CLND. The main reason is the chance of a local lymph node recurrence that would later require more difficult surgery". So I see the pros and cons.
Now my Oncologist at The University of KU told me that I would have a CLND if the pet scan and mri results come back negative. I have also reached out to MD Anderson about this and am awaiting their response to my question. I meet with my Oncologist from KU on Thursday so I will definitely ask this question to discuss.
I am curious to know everyone's thoughts on this and especially the thoughts from anyone that actually had the procedure and what the recovery was like, life thereafter, etc.
Just a reminder…my tumor stage from the AJCC based upon one positive lymph node from my SLNB says that I am T3aN1a, no ulceration, micrometastasis, 3mm, involves 7% of nodal cross sectional area and is negative for extracapsular extension.
Thanks in advance for your responses…..Stacy
-
- July 27, 2016 at 3:13 pm
Hello all,
So I just wanted to ask the question….Is there a need to have a CLND? I guess conventional wisdom says yes, but I very curious. I came across some results from a phase III study presented last year in May at the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting in Chicago entitled "No need for Lymph Node Dissection in Certain Melanoma Patients".
Basically saying that a CLND for people with MICROmetastatic cutaneous melanoma following a positive SLNB "may" not be necessary. So after my SLNB, my pathology report states that I am MICRO and not MACRO!
In the paper it states that "a potential improvement in survival is only one reason that a patient could be recommended to undergo a CLND. The main reason is the chance of a local lymph node recurrence that would later require more difficult surgery". So I see the pros and cons.
Now my Oncologist at The University of KU told me that I would have a CLND if the pet scan and mri results come back negative. I have also reached out to MD Anderson about this and am awaiting their response to my question. I meet with my Oncologist from KU on Thursday so I will definitely ask this question to discuss.
I am curious to know everyone's thoughts on this and especially the thoughts from anyone that actually had the procedure and what the recovery was like, life thereafter, etc.
Just a reminder…my tumor stage from the AJCC based upon one positive lymph node from my SLNB says that I am T3aN1a, no ulceration, micrometastasis, 3mm, involves 7% of nodal cross sectional area and is negative for extracapsular extension.
Thanks in advance for your responses…..Stacy
-
- July 27, 2016 at 3:13 pm
Hello all,
So I just wanted to ask the question….Is there a need to have a CLND? I guess conventional wisdom says yes, but I very curious. I came across some results from a phase III study presented last year in May at the 2015 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting in Chicago entitled "No need for Lymph Node Dissection in Certain Melanoma Patients".
Basically saying that a CLND for people with MICROmetastatic cutaneous melanoma following a positive SLNB "may" not be necessary. So after my SLNB, my pathology report states that I am MICRO and not MACRO!
In the paper it states that "a potential improvement in survival is only one reason that a patient could be recommended to undergo a CLND. The main reason is the chance of a local lymph node recurrence that would later require more difficult surgery". So I see the pros and cons.
Now my Oncologist at The University of KU told me that I would have a CLND if the pet scan and mri results come back negative. I have also reached out to MD Anderson about this and am awaiting their response to my question. I meet with my Oncologist from KU on Thursday so I will definitely ask this question to discuss.
I am curious to know everyone's thoughts on this and especially the thoughts from anyone that actually had the procedure and what the recovery was like, life thereafter, etc.
Just a reminder…my tumor stage from the AJCC based upon one positive lymph node from my SLNB says that I am T3aN1a, no ulceration, micrometastasis, 3mm, involves 7% of nodal cross sectional area and is negative for extracapsular extension.
Thanks in advance for your responses…..Stacy
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.