The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Dysplastic Nevus with Severe Atypia

Forums General Melanoma Community Dysplastic Nevus with Severe Atypia

  • Post
    the shadow
    Participant

      First, I'm sorry if this is not an appropriate topic for the Board, since it's not directly related to melanoma.

      I had a mole biopsied because it had a scab. The mole came back as a dysplastic nevus with severe atypia. I've had dysplastic nevi in the past (and probably have others), but never one with severe atypia.

      The biopsy was reviewed by a dermatopathologist. Is there any point in seeking a second opinion, or should I just be glad it wasn't diagnosed as melanoma and get the WLE?

      Thanks!

    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Replies
        Janner
        Participant

          You can if you want, but personally, I wouldn't.  Always better NOT to have a melanoma diagnosis in your past and you never know what another opinion will say.  Both melanoma in situ and severely atypical lesions are typically excised with the same 5mm margins.  So just make sure you get at least 5mm margins and you are treating it the same as melanoma but without that negative history.

          Janner
          Participant

            You can if you want, but personally, I wouldn't.  Always better NOT to have a melanoma diagnosis in your past and you never know what another opinion will say.  Both melanoma in situ and severely atypical lesions are typically excised with the same 5mm margins.  So just make sure you get at least 5mm margins and you are treating it the same as melanoma but without that negative history.

              the shadow
              Participant

                Thanks for the advice. That makes sense. Part of me questions what the harm would be in getting a second opinion, especially with the protections for preexisting conditions in Obamacare. But if it doesn't change the treatment, maybe there isn't any point to a second opinion.

                Janner
                Participant

                  My warning was not for Obamacare, my warning was for life insurance.  Pre-existing condions are gone but life insurance companies have no restrictions and they don't like melanoma.

                  As long as the pathologist was a dermatopathologist, your in the right hands. Some docs over diagnose to protect themselves so you never know what you will get. As always it is your call.

                  Janner
                  Participant

                    My warning was not for Obamacare, my warning was for life insurance.  Pre-existing condions are gone but life insurance companies have no restrictions and they don't like melanoma.

                    As long as the pathologist was a dermatopathologist, your in the right hands. Some docs over diagnose to protect themselves so you never know what you will get. As always it is your call.

                    Janner
                    Participant

                      My warning was not for Obamacare, my warning was for life insurance.  Pre-existing condions are gone but life insurance companies have no restrictions and they don't like melanoma.

                      As long as the pathologist was a dermatopathologist, your in the right hands. Some docs over diagnose to protect themselves so you never know what you will get. As always it is your call.

                      the shadow
                      Participant

                        Thanks for the advice. That makes sense. Part of me questions what the harm would be in getting a second opinion, especially with the protections for preexisting conditions in Obamacare. But if it doesn't change the treatment, maybe there isn't any point to a second opinion.

                        the shadow
                        Participant

                          Thanks for the advice. That makes sense. Part of me questions what the harm would be in getting a second opinion, especially with the protections for preexisting conditions in Obamacare. But if it doesn't change the treatment, maybe there isn't any point to a second opinion.

                        Janner
                        Participant

                          You can if you want, but personally, I wouldn't.  Always better NOT to have a melanoma diagnosis in your past and you never know what another opinion will say.  Both melanoma in situ and severely atypical lesions are typically excised with the same 5mm margins.  So just make sure you get at least 5mm margins and you are treating it the same as melanoma but without that negative history.

                      Viewing 2 reply threads
                      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                      About the MRF Patient Forum

                      The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                      The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.