› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Ginger Gene (article)
- This topic has 51 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 10 months ago by
Scared99.
- Post
-
- July 20, 2016 at 4:00 am
My dad sent me this article, thought it was very interesting.
http://www.today.com/health/how-red-hair-gene-raises-skin-cancer-risk-t100749?cid=eml_onsite
I am the only one in my large family with red hair. When I first met my melanoma dermatologist she told me that even if I had never seen an ounce of sun in my life, I probably would have ended up with melanoma anyway due to the red head gene. It's like I was born with 2 decades worth of UV ray exposure without ever having seen the sun yet, pretty wild. Any other gingers on here will find this interesting too.
It's also for anyone with light hair and light eyes… you likely have the ginger gene in you too.
- Replies
-
-
- July 20, 2016 at 2:38 pm
Actually many people get melanoma and they don't have red hair gene, light hair or blue eyes, but many get it from not enough sun because of lack of sun can cause it as well since the body would be lacking Vitamin D3.
So while your dermatologist is right in saying you could get it from not having ever seen the sun is correct but it wouldn't be because of the Ginger Gene as you call it since melanoma isn't caused by the sun.
If it was how could you get it in the parts the sun never sees such as your groin, soles of your feet or places the sun never shines and also why do dark skinned, dark eyed and dark haired people get it as well. Or how about those that work night turn and sleep during the day get it the same as the sun bathers. Maybe it is more something lacking in your system that can cause it. Maybe your Vitamin D3 is extremely low because you don't get enough sun (10-15 minutes a day is all it takes in the sun to get enough Vitamin D3 for the day or even longer) and the type you get from supplements has to be converted to the proper type. Vitamin D3 is actually a hormone and not really a vitamin at all. Also those living above Atlanta, GA are usually deficient as we don't get enough sun or if you have the winter cold months when your body is covered up. Maybe there could even be something else that the body is not getting enough of that causes it. Could be the chemicals in the soil that goes into the food we eat, or the air we breathe and who knows because no one is researching that. Maybe it is in the chemicals we put on our bodies, causing more cancers, like lotions, detergents. Even if you use sunscreen it is full of chemicals and then you bake it into you body by being out in the sun. The drugs you take cause reactions some of them are harmful so what we put on our skin could also be harmful reactions. All the chlorine in our water and fluouride could be causing some of the harmful reactions.
Many people live where they wear little to no clothing but is melanoma running rabid there. Lots to think about and we will probably never get answers as I don't think anyone has the answer.
I am light skinned, was a tow head as a youngster, blue eyes and I didn't get the melanoma my spouse did who has dark hair and worked 40 years of mostly midnights and afternoon turn with overtime as well so he never was out in the sun much. We try to get 10-15 minutes a day of sunshine with no sunscreen.
Judy (loving wife of Gene Stage IV and now NED for 4 years)
-
- July 20, 2016 at 3:29 pm
The gene that causes redhair IS what can cause melanoma to occur. The MC1R gene causes an uptick in melanoma mutations. You may not believe UV exposure causes melanoma because your husband was hardly exposed, but no expert has ever said that and never will. They say that melanoma is 90% caused by UV rays, maybe it's actually a bit less than that. But, that also means that there's a good chunk of people who will get melanoma for other reasons (like myself who has never had a blistering sunburn in her life because she's been taught to be careful since the day she was born). Maybe your husband was born with some kind of mutations as well and the lack of vitamin D allowed melanoma to grow. Who knows, it's all still quite a mystery, but I like that science is beginning to learn more, like in the case of red heads, that we don't necessarily get melanoma because we are pale and burn easily, but because we have a unique gene that actually causes melanoma to grow without the need for sun exposure. Also, I am not vitamin D deficient, I've been checked. Lived in California since I was 3, lots of sun to soak up all year round, been getting just enough to not get burned my whole life.
-
- July 20, 2016 at 4:48 pm
Also, unless someone lived in a cave their whole life, there's no way not to have some UV exposure!
I have read from that some percentage of melanoma cases are not caused by sun damage. The majority is believed to have been from sun damage, however, i.e., greater than half. The number I remember is roughly 65%.
I was a redhead, and aquired some sun damage for sure.
-
- July 20, 2016 at 4:48 pm
Also, unless someone lived in a cave their whole life, there's no way not to have some UV exposure!
I have read from that some percentage of melanoma cases are not caused by sun damage. The majority is believed to have been from sun damage, however, i.e., greater than half. The number I remember is roughly 65%.
I was a redhead, and aquired some sun damage for sure.
-
- July 20, 2016 at 4:48 pm
Also, unless someone lived in a cave their whole life, there's no way not to have some UV exposure!
I have read from that some percentage of melanoma cases are not caused by sun damage. The majority is believed to have been from sun damage, however, i.e., greater than half. The number I remember is roughly 65%.
I was a redhead, and aquired some sun damage for sure.
-
- July 20, 2016 at 3:29 pm
The gene that causes redhair IS what can cause melanoma to occur. The MC1R gene causes an uptick in melanoma mutations. You may not believe UV exposure causes melanoma because your husband was hardly exposed, but no expert has ever said that and never will. They say that melanoma is 90% caused by UV rays, maybe it's actually a bit less than that. But, that also means that there's a good chunk of people who will get melanoma for other reasons (like myself who has never had a blistering sunburn in her life because she's been taught to be careful since the day she was born). Maybe your husband was born with some kind of mutations as well and the lack of vitamin D allowed melanoma to grow. Who knows, it's all still quite a mystery, but I like that science is beginning to learn more, like in the case of red heads, that we don't necessarily get melanoma because we are pale and burn easily, but because we have a unique gene that actually causes melanoma to grow without the need for sun exposure. Also, I am not vitamin D deficient, I've been checked. Lived in California since I was 3, lots of sun to soak up all year round, been getting just enough to not get burned my whole life.
-
- July 20, 2016 at 3:29 pm
The gene that causes redhair IS what can cause melanoma to occur. The MC1R gene causes an uptick in melanoma mutations. You may not believe UV exposure causes melanoma because your husband was hardly exposed, but no expert has ever said that and never will. They say that melanoma is 90% caused by UV rays, maybe it's actually a bit less than that. But, that also means that there's a good chunk of people who will get melanoma for other reasons (like myself who has never had a blistering sunburn in her life because she's been taught to be careful since the day she was born). Maybe your husband was born with some kind of mutations as well and the lack of vitamin D allowed melanoma to grow. Who knows, it's all still quite a mystery, but I like that science is beginning to learn more, like in the case of red heads, that we don't necessarily get melanoma because we are pale and burn easily, but because we have a unique gene that actually causes melanoma to grow without the need for sun exposure. Also, I am not vitamin D deficient, I've been checked. Lived in California since I was 3, lots of sun to soak up all year round, been getting just enough to not get burned my whole life.
-
- July 20, 2016 at 2:38 pm
Actually many people get melanoma and they don't have red hair gene, light hair or blue eyes, but many get it from not enough sun because of lack of sun can cause it as well since the body would be lacking Vitamin D3.
So while your dermatologist is right in saying you could get it from not having ever seen the sun is correct but it wouldn't be because of the Ginger Gene as you call it since melanoma isn't caused by the sun.
If it was how could you get it in the parts the sun never sees such as your groin, soles of your feet or places the sun never shines and also why do dark skinned, dark eyed and dark haired people get it as well. Or how about those that work night turn and sleep during the day get it the same as the sun bathers. Maybe it is more something lacking in your system that can cause it. Maybe your Vitamin D3 is extremely low because you don't get enough sun (10-15 minutes a day is all it takes in the sun to get enough Vitamin D3 for the day or even longer) and the type you get from supplements has to be converted to the proper type. Vitamin D3 is actually a hormone and not really a vitamin at all. Also those living above Atlanta, GA are usually deficient as we don't get enough sun or if you have the winter cold months when your body is covered up. Maybe there could even be something else that the body is not getting enough of that causes it. Could be the chemicals in the soil that goes into the food we eat, or the air we breathe and who knows because no one is researching that. Maybe it is in the chemicals we put on our bodies, causing more cancers, like lotions, detergents. Even if you use sunscreen it is full of chemicals and then you bake it into you body by being out in the sun. The drugs you take cause reactions some of them are harmful so what we put on our skin could also be harmful reactions. All the chlorine in our water and fluouride could be causing some of the harmful reactions.
Many people live where they wear little to no clothing but is melanoma running rabid there. Lots to think about and we will probably never get answers as I don't think anyone has the answer.
I am light skinned, was a tow head as a youngster, blue eyes and I didn't get the melanoma my spouse did who has dark hair and worked 40 years of mostly midnights and afternoon turn with overtime as well so he never was out in the sun much. We try to get 10-15 minutes a day of sunshine with no sunscreen.
Judy (loving wife of Gene Stage IV and now NED for 4 years)
-
- July 20, 2016 at 2:38 pm
Actually many people get melanoma and they don't have red hair gene, light hair or blue eyes, but many get it from not enough sun because of lack of sun can cause it as well since the body would be lacking Vitamin D3.
So while your dermatologist is right in saying you could get it from not having ever seen the sun is correct but it wouldn't be because of the Ginger Gene as you call it since melanoma isn't caused by the sun.
If it was how could you get it in the parts the sun never sees such as your groin, soles of your feet or places the sun never shines and also why do dark skinned, dark eyed and dark haired people get it as well. Or how about those that work night turn and sleep during the day get it the same as the sun bathers. Maybe it is more something lacking in your system that can cause it. Maybe your Vitamin D3 is extremely low because you don't get enough sun (10-15 minutes a day is all it takes in the sun to get enough Vitamin D3 for the day or even longer) and the type you get from supplements has to be converted to the proper type. Vitamin D3 is actually a hormone and not really a vitamin at all. Also those living above Atlanta, GA are usually deficient as we don't get enough sun or if you have the winter cold months when your body is covered up. Maybe there could even be something else that the body is not getting enough of that causes it. Could be the chemicals in the soil that goes into the food we eat, or the air we breathe and who knows because no one is researching that. Maybe it is in the chemicals we put on our bodies, causing more cancers, like lotions, detergents. Even if you use sunscreen it is full of chemicals and then you bake it into you body by being out in the sun. The drugs you take cause reactions some of them are harmful so what we put on our skin could also be harmful reactions. All the chlorine in our water and fluouride could be causing some of the harmful reactions.
Many people live where they wear little to no clothing but is melanoma running rabid there. Lots to think about and we will probably never get answers as I don't think anyone has the answer.
I am light skinned, was a tow head as a youngster, blue eyes and I didn't get the melanoma my spouse did who has dark hair and worked 40 years of mostly midnights and afternoon turn with overtime as well so he never was out in the sun much. We try to get 10-15 minutes a day of sunshine with no sunscreen.
Judy (loving wife of Gene Stage IV and now NED for 4 years)
-
- July 20, 2016 at 4:23 pm
If we really knew or the scientists/doctors really knew; we'd all probably be in a better spot. I think there are various factors thatcan come into play. I truly believe for myself that it was overexposure to the sun. I've always had a dark complexion and take after my dad's side of the family who is from Sicily. I don't have any family history of melanoma and none of the "Primary" mutations BRAF & NRAS. So why me? I wish they could pin it down to my genome or in that case for anyoneand find a way to treat this terrible disease.
While I think for your dermatologist telling you that you probably would've ended up with melanoma anyway is ridiculous, I can see how that Ginger Gene plays a role. It's kind of like markers in the blood or side effects indicating response to immunotherapy; do they really know…is there strong scientific evidence? So while I think the sun is good….everything in moderation.
Josh
-
- July 20, 2016 at 4:23 pm
If we really knew or the scientists/doctors really knew; we'd all probably be in a better spot. I think there are various factors thatcan come into play. I truly believe for myself that it was overexposure to the sun. I've always had a dark complexion and take after my dad's side of the family who is from Sicily. I don't have any family history of melanoma and none of the "Primary" mutations BRAF & NRAS. So why me? I wish they could pin it down to my genome or in that case for anyoneand find a way to treat this terrible disease.
While I think for your dermatologist telling you that you probably would've ended up with melanoma anyway is ridiculous, I can see how that Ginger Gene plays a role. It's kind of like markers in the blood or side effects indicating response to immunotherapy; do they really know…is there strong scientific evidence? So while I think the sun is good….everything in moderation.
Josh
-
- July 20, 2016 at 4:23 pm
If we really knew or the scientists/doctors really knew; we'd all probably be in a better spot. I think there are various factors thatcan come into play. I truly believe for myself that it was overexposure to the sun. I've always had a dark complexion and take after my dad's side of the family who is from Sicily. I don't have any family history of melanoma and none of the "Primary" mutations BRAF & NRAS. So why me? I wish they could pin it down to my genome or in that case for anyoneand find a way to treat this terrible disease.
While I think for your dermatologist telling you that you probably would've ended up with melanoma anyway is ridiculous, I can see how that Ginger Gene plays a role. It's kind of like markers in the blood or side effects indicating response to immunotherapy; do they really know…is there strong scientific evidence? So while I think the sun is good….everything in moderation.
Josh
-
- July 20, 2016 at 5:13 pm
I honestly do not think we will EVER know what the true cause of Melanoma is. Right now there is too much money on the table with sunscreen industry. It is easy to link Melanoma to sun exposure. Almost every human alive has had a bad sun burn and when someone gets melanoma it is logical to say " Crap that sunburn from 10 years ago got me" But the majority of people who have had a bad sun burn, bad 10 sun burns, bad 50 sun burns, used tanning beds etc, etc, etc, will NEVER get melanoma.
It could be diet, it coule be genetics, it could be sun, it could be stress, it could be a mixture of all these things or one of these cuprits can cause melanoma when our immune system is weak.
All I know is more people than ever continue to put on their sun screen, summer, winter, fall, spring and the Melanoma rate continues to rise.
I know two people who have had melanoma ! One of them is my best friend and the reason I found this forum. She never saw the sun ! She did not have a ton of moles and she did not use tanning beds.
The other guy was not a sunbather and had some casual exposure over his years.
Yet most of my coworkers and friends work on their tans during the summer and spring months. I know a few that have used tanning beds for over 15 years and keep a golden tan all year. None of them have had melanoma. A few of them have had stuff froze and scooped off their bodies.
Even look at some of the medical studies on sun exposure. Some of these studies link a high level of life time sun exposure to a reduced risk of melanoma. Some studies show that sun exposure puts people at risk for melanoma. Some studies show people with a large number of moles are at a higher risk for melamoma and the latest study shows that most people diagnosed with melanoma have very few moles.
I do not have melanoma but when my friend was diagnosed I tried to help her out and research as much as I can and to be honest it pissed me off and frustrated me. What is the answer ??
-
- July 20, 2016 at 5:13 pm
I honestly do not think we will EVER know what the true cause of Melanoma is. Right now there is too much money on the table with sunscreen industry. It is easy to link Melanoma to sun exposure. Almost every human alive has had a bad sun burn and when someone gets melanoma it is logical to say " Crap that sunburn from 10 years ago got me" But the majority of people who have had a bad sun burn, bad 10 sun burns, bad 50 sun burns, used tanning beds etc, etc, etc, will NEVER get melanoma.
It could be diet, it coule be genetics, it could be sun, it could be stress, it could be a mixture of all these things or one of these cuprits can cause melanoma when our immune system is weak.
All I know is more people than ever continue to put on their sun screen, summer, winter, fall, spring and the Melanoma rate continues to rise.
I know two people who have had melanoma ! One of them is my best friend and the reason I found this forum. She never saw the sun ! She did not have a ton of moles and she did not use tanning beds.
The other guy was not a sunbather and had some casual exposure over his years.
Yet most of my coworkers and friends work on their tans during the summer and spring months. I know a few that have used tanning beds for over 15 years and keep a golden tan all year. None of them have had melanoma. A few of them have had stuff froze and scooped off their bodies.
Even look at some of the medical studies on sun exposure. Some of these studies link a high level of life time sun exposure to a reduced risk of melanoma. Some studies show that sun exposure puts people at risk for melanoma. Some studies show people with a large number of moles are at a higher risk for melamoma and the latest study shows that most people diagnosed with melanoma have very few moles.
I do not have melanoma but when my friend was diagnosed I tried to help her out and research as much as I can and to be honest it pissed me off and frustrated me. What is the answer ??
-
- July 20, 2016 at 5:13 pm
I honestly do not think we will EVER know what the true cause of Melanoma is. Right now there is too much money on the table with sunscreen industry. It is easy to link Melanoma to sun exposure. Almost every human alive has had a bad sun burn and when someone gets melanoma it is logical to say " Crap that sunburn from 10 years ago got me" But the majority of people who have had a bad sun burn, bad 10 sun burns, bad 50 sun burns, used tanning beds etc, etc, etc, will NEVER get melanoma.
It could be diet, it coule be genetics, it could be sun, it could be stress, it could be a mixture of all these things or one of these cuprits can cause melanoma when our immune system is weak.
All I know is more people than ever continue to put on their sun screen, summer, winter, fall, spring and the Melanoma rate continues to rise.
I know two people who have had melanoma ! One of them is my best friend and the reason I found this forum. She never saw the sun ! She did not have a ton of moles and she did not use tanning beds.
The other guy was not a sunbather and had some casual exposure over his years.
Yet most of my coworkers and friends work on their tans during the summer and spring months. I know a few that have used tanning beds for over 15 years and keep a golden tan all year. None of them have had melanoma. A few of them have had stuff froze and scooped off their bodies.
Even look at some of the medical studies on sun exposure. Some of these studies link a high level of life time sun exposure to a reduced risk of melanoma. Some studies show that sun exposure puts people at risk for melanoma. Some studies show people with a large number of moles are at a higher risk for melamoma and the latest study shows that most people diagnosed with melanoma have very few moles.
I do not have melanoma but when my friend was diagnosed I tried to help her out and research as much as I can and to be honest it pissed me off and frustrated me. What is the answer ??
-
- July 20, 2016 at 8:40 pm
Hi Jenn,
Gee, it looks as though being a redhead simply increases risk, with sun exposure or not. Ouch! My son just married a redhead too. I don't know whether to say something or not. No doubt she knows of sunburn risk and follows the sunscreen rules, but its scary to think it may not matter, and worse, to create fear and stress about something you have no control over does nothing for quality of life. I have little doubt a long and sordid history of blistering sunburns, combined with a particularly stressful point in my life lead to my illness, but at least I know, or should have known better what I was doing.
Gary
-
- July 20, 2016 at 8:40 pm
Hi Jenn,
Gee, it looks as though being a redhead simply increases risk, with sun exposure or not. Ouch! My son just married a redhead too. I don't know whether to say something or not. No doubt she knows of sunburn risk and follows the sunscreen rules, but its scary to think it may not matter, and worse, to create fear and stress about something you have no control over does nothing for quality of life. I have little doubt a long and sordid history of blistering sunburns, combined with a particularly stressful point in my life lead to my illness, but at least I know, or should have known better what I was doing.
Gary
-
- July 20, 2016 at 8:40 pm
Hi Jenn,
Gee, it looks as though being a redhead simply increases risk, with sun exposure or not. Ouch! My son just married a redhead too. I don't know whether to say something or not. No doubt she knows of sunburn risk and follows the sunscreen rules, but its scary to think it may not matter, and worse, to create fear and stress about something you have no control over does nothing for quality of life. I have little doubt a long and sordid history of blistering sunburns, combined with a particularly stressful point in my life lead to my illness, but at least I know, or should have known better what I was doing.
Gary
-
- July 21, 2016 at 12:24 am
It's pretty crazy. My boss and her son are redheads and my two best friends are also redheads. They've all been informed of our weird gene and the higher risk. Of course the idea that it's completely out of our control is scary, but knowing about it and being more aware to watch for new or changing moles and to get them checked out ASAP is what's most important. They've all thanked me for the info I can give them to make them more aware of the possibility. I hope no one close to me gets melanoma, but hopefully through my experience those close to me are much more cautious that if anything does come up they will catch it early.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 12:24 am
It's pretty crazy. My boss and her son are redheads and my two best friends are also redheads. They've all been informed of our weird gene and the higher risk. Of course the idea that it's completely out of our control is scary, but knowing about it and being more aware to watch for new or changing moles and to get them checked out ASAP is what's most important. They've all thanked me for the info I can give them to make them more aware of the possibility. I hope no one close to me gets melanoma, but hopefully through my experience those close to me are much more cautious that if anything does come up they will catch it early.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 12:24 am
It's pretty crazy. My boss and her son are redheads and my two best friends are also redheads. They've all been informed of our weird gene and the higher risk. Of course the idea that it's completely out of our control is scary, but knowing about it and being more aware to watch for new or changing moles and to get them checked out ASAP is what's most important. They've all thanked me for the info I can give them to make them more aware of the possibility. I hope no one close to me gets melanoma, but hopefully through my experience those close to me are much more cautious that if anything does come up they will catch it early.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 5:39 am
Jenn,
That article reminded me of this one. I hadn't read it in a long time. It backs up the article your father forwarded you. The gist I get out if it is, red heads' skin is more susceptible to mutations, whether from the sun or just the normal oxidative stresses of life in a cell nucleus.
https://www.wistar.org/sites/default/files/content/Kalabis_2012_Nature.pdf
I guess there's a few different ways genetics-wise to end up with red hair, maybe with different effects on DNA damage. I had multiple blistering burns and was a redhead. The locations of both of my primaries are in sun-exposed areas, so that makes me think that the sun as an issue. But it sounds like we are at higher risk of both UV-caused and non-UV-caused melanoma.
I think the takeaways for a redhead are 1) our skin is more susceptible to UV damage, but 2) our skin is more susceptible to genetic damage from normal oxidation. Which means I still get much more 'bang for my buck' with skin protection than a non-red head, on average. My skin is just more at risk, in two different ways.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 5:39 am
Jenn,
That article reminded me of this one. I hadn't read it in a long time. It backs up the article your father forwarded you. The gist I get out if it is, red heads' skin is more susceptible to mutations, whether from the sun or just the normal oxidative stresses of life in a cell nucleus.
https://www.wistar.org/sites/default/files/content/Kalabis_2012_Nature.pdf
I guess there's a few different ways genetics-wise to end up with red hair, maybe with different effects on DNA damage. I had multiple blistering burns and was a redhead. The locations of both of my primaries are in sun-exposed areas, so that makes me think that the sun as an issue. But it sounds like we are at higher risk of both UV-caused and non-UV-caused melanoma.
I think the takeaways for a redhead are 1) our skin is more susceptible to UV damage, but 2) our skin is more susceptible to genetic damage from normal oxidation. Which means I still get much more 'bang for my buck' with skin protection than a non-red head, on average. My skin is just more at risk, in two different ways.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 5:39 am
Jenn,
That article reminded me of this one. I hadn't read it in a long time. It backs up the article your father forwarded you. The gist I get out if it is, red heads' skin is more susceptible to mutations, whether from the sun or just the normal oxidative stresses of life in a cell nucleus.
https://www.wistar.org/sites/default/files/content/Kalabis_2012_Nature.pdf
I guess there's a few different ways genetics-wise to end up with red hair, maybe with different effects on DNA damage. I had multiple blistering burns and was a redhead. The locations of both of my primaries are in sun-exposed areas, so that makes me think that the sun as an issue. But it sounds like we are at higher risk of both UV-caused and non-UV-caused melanoma.
I think the takeaways for a redhead are 1) our skin is more susceptible to UV damage, but 2) our skin is more susceptible to genetic damage from normal oxidation. Which means I still get much more 'bang for my buck' with skin protection than a non-red head, on average. My skin is just more at risk, in two different ways.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 4:19 pm
Thanks Kyle, it's all very interesting stuff. We sure got the short end of the genetic stick. My melanoma showed up on my leg, a place I have never gotten much sun, certainly never had sunburned legs. So, it makes sense to me that my melanoma might be more caused by genes over UV exposure.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 4:19 pm
Thanks Kyle, it's all very interesting stuff. We sure got the short end of the genetic stick. My melanoma showed up on my leg, a place I have never gotten much sun, certainly never had sunburned legs. So, it makes sense to me that my melanoma might be more caused by genes over UV exposure.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 4:19 pm
Thanks Kyle, it's all very interesting stuff. We sure got the short end of the genetic stick. My melanoma showed up on my leg, a place I have never gotten much sun, certainly never had sunburned legs. So, it makes sense to me that my melanoma might be more caused by genes over UV exposure.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 6:29 am
Good article Jenn,
I've read several others like this, with some even suggesting that redheads are likely to be few and far between in the coming decades .
I am a redhead. Grew up in the sixties when there was little , or no awareness on the real dangers of sunburns . Heck I'm not even sure there was any serious sun protection available . Zinc oxide on the nose was considered protection , but no one really wanted to walk around with a white nose back then. So , uncountable blistering sunburns was the norm for me . As kids we use to see who could peel the largest piece of skin off after the burn. I usually won. Always had a perpetual scab on the nose as a kid.
Of course it's of little wonder now ,considering the gene aspect,and throwing gas on the fire that melanoma is part of my everyday life now. Who knew?
Nine primaries and counting . Neck,back,both shoulders,abdomen , and an elbow so far.
There was always plenty of Copper tone around back then. "TAN! Don't burn,get a Copper tone tan!" The jingle went something like that . I am glad the awareness has shifted .
Be well.
Bob
-
- July 21, 2016 at 6:29 am
Good article Jenn,
I've read several others like this, with some even suggesting that redheads are likely to be few and far between in the coming decades .
I am a redhead. Grew up in the sixties when there was little , or no awareness on the real dangers of sunburns . Heck I'm not even sure there was any serious sun protection available . Zinc oxide on the nose was considered protection , but no one really wanted to walk around with a white nose back then. So , uncountable blistering sunburns was the norm for me . As kids we use to see who could peel the largest piece of skin off after the burn. I usually won. Always had a perpetual scab on the nose as a kid.
Of course it's of little wonder now ,considering the gene aspect,and throwing gas on the fire that melanoma is part of my everyday life now. Who knew?
Nine primaries and counting . Neck,back,both shoulders,abdomen , and an elbow so far.
There was always plenty of Copper tone around back then. "TAN! Don't burn,get a Copper tone tan!" The jingle went something like that . I am glad the awareness has shifted .
Be well.
Bob
-
- July 21, 2016 at 6:29 am
Good article Jenn,
I've read several others like this, with some even suggesting that redheads are likely to be few and far between in the coming decades .
I am a redhead. Grew up in the sixties when there was little , or no awareness on the real dangers of sunburns . Heck I'm not even sure there was any serious sun protection available . Zinc oxide on the nose was considered protection , but no one really wanted to walk around with a white nose back then. So , uncountable blistering sunburns was the norm for me . As kids we use to see who could peel the largest piece of skin off after the burn. I usually won. Always had a perpetual scab on the nose as a kid.
Of course it's of little wonder now ,considering the gene aspect,and throwing gas on the fire that melanoma is part of my everyday life now. Who knew?
Nine primaries and counting . Neck,back,both shoulders,abdomen , and an elbow so far.
There was always plenty of Copper tone around back then. "TAN! Don't burn,get a Copper tone tan!" The jingle went something like that . I am glad the awareness has shifted .
Be well.
Bob
-
- July 21, 2016 at 3:13 pm
I grew up in the early 70s. The big thing for me was "Pre-Sun" as a sun block. I kinda doubt it blocked much if any UVA/UVB. In which case, if it enabled me to stay longer in the sun, just made things worse. "Only" 2 primaries here, and a bunch of basal cell BCCs.
A "MC1R" gene with a variation is something extinct Neanderthals apparently had. Even though this article is from 2007, "Neanderthals were Flame-Haired". Although they say some modern DNA retains a bit of Neanderthal. Perhaps why we sunburn so easily.
Maybe better sunblocks now will help gingers not get Darwin'd out of existence. Super-pale-skin was designed to produce more Vitamin D for northern climates. Even if it leaves us at greater risk from non-sun-based skin damage too. At least if we live to 40 or 50 or so, a next generation could make it into the world, right?
-
- July 21, 2016 at 3:13 pm
I grew up in the early 70s. The big thing for me was "Pre-Sun" as a sun block. I kinda doubt it blocked much if any UVA/UVB. In which case, if it enabled me to stay longer in the sun, just made things worse. "Only" 2 primaries here, and a bunch of basal cell BCCs.
A "MC1R" gene with a variation is something extinct Neanderthals apparently had. Even though this article is from 2007, "Neanderthals were Flame-Haired". Although they say some modern DNA retains a bit of Neanderthal. Perhaps why we sunburn so easily.
Maybe better sunblocks now will help gingers not get Darwin'd out of existence. Super-pale-skin was designed to produce more Vitamin D for northern climates. Even if it leaves us at greater risk from non-sun-based skin damage too. At least if we live to 40 or 50 or so, a next generation could make it into the world, right?
-
- July 21, 2016 at 3:13 pm
I grew up in the early 70s. The big thing for me was "Pre-Sun" as a sun block. I kinda doubt it blocked much if any UVA/UVB. In which case, if it enabled me to stay longer in the sun, just made things worse. "Only" 2 primaries here, and a bunch of basal cell BCCs.
A "MC1R" gene with a variation is something extinct Neanderthals apparently had. Even though this article is from 2007, "Neanderthals were Flame-Haired". Although they say some modern DNA retains a bit of Neanderthal. Perhaps why we sunburn so easily.
Maybe better sunblocks now will help gingers not get Darwin'd out of existence. Super-pale-skin was designed to produce more Vitamin D for northern climates. Even if it leaves us at greater risk from non-sun-based skin damage too. At least if we live to 40 or 50 or so, a next generation could make it into the world, right?
-
- July 21, 2016 at 4:26 pm
Yikes, it's wild to think there were days when sun protection just didn't exist. I feel lucky to have been born in the 80s and my parents were very much into sun block and hats and keeping me out of the sun for long periods of time. Even though my mom was a major tanner, she made sure I was protected. She no longer tans.. but it's a little too late. Hopefully she doesn't ever deal with skin cancer of any form. My dad gets BCCs taken off all the time, every 6 months when he sees his derm he gets another taken off. Poor guy. I am sure he spent many years sun exposed without sun protection before the whole sun screen and be safe in the sun stuff started. Hopefully there will be less melanoma and other skin cancers in the future generations.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 4:26 pm
Yikes, it's wild to think there were days when sun protection just didn't exist. I feel lucky to have been born in the 80s and my parents were very much into sun block and hats and keeping me out of the sun for long periods of time. Even though my mom was a major tanner, she made sure I was protected. She no longer tans.. but it's a little too late. Hopefully she doesn't ever deal with skin cancer of any form. My dad gets BCCs taken off all the time, every 6 months when he sees his derm he gets another taken off. Poor guy. I am sure he spent many years sun exposed without sun protection before the whole sun screen and be safe in the sun stuff started. Hopefully there will be less melanoma and other skin cancers in the future generations.
-
- July 21, 2016 at 4:26 pm
Yikes, it's wild to think there were days when sun protection just didn't exist. I feel lucky to have been born in the 80s and my parents were very much into sun block and hats and keeping me out of the sun for long periods of time. Even though my mom was a major tanner, she made sure I was protected. She no longer tans.. but it's a little too late. Hopefully she doesn't ever deal with skin cancer of any form. My dad gets BCCs taken off all the time, every 6 months when he sees his derm he gets another taken off. Poor guy. I am sure he spent many years sun exposed without sun protection before the whole sun screen and be safe in the sun stuff started. Hopefully there will be less melanoma and other skin cancers in the future generations.
-
- July 22, 2016 at 1:38 pm
Actually I read an article where melanoma has increased since the use of so much sunscreen has been told to so many. Perhaps all the chemicals you are baking in are the cause of this since everyone is pushing sunscreen and the chemical companies are making big bucks.
-
- July 22, 2016 at 3:22 pm
All those people who never used sun screen or poured oil on themselves and sat out in the sun because being tan in the 70s/80s was very in style, are now getting to an age where a cancer diagnosis is very likely, so there is a lot of melanoma happening because the times are catching up with people. As the new generations are becoming more aware of the damage sun will do to your skin, not just skin cancer but aging and not wanting to look 50 when you're 35, I believe we will see a decline in skin cancer in the future. But, that will be a while. Sorry I don't buy the whole "sun screen chemicals are killing me" theory. But, everyone is entitled to their opinion. I stick with the opinions of medical professionals, and not a single one has told me NOT to use sun screen because sun screen will cause cancer. No proof on that, so I will stick with it when I am outside exposed to the sun for longer than 30 minutes.
-
- July 22, 2016 at 3:22 pm
All those people who never used sun screen or poured oil on themselves and sat out in the sun because being tan in the 70s/80s was very in style, are now getting to an age where a cancer diagnosis is very likely, so there is a lot of melanoma happening because the times are catching up with people. As the new generations are becoming more aware of the damage sun will do to your skin, not just skin cancer but aging and not wanting to look 50 when you're 35, I believe we will see a decline in skin cancer in the future. But, that will be a while. Sorry I don't buy the whole "sun screen chemicals are killing me" theory. But, everyone is entitled to their opinion. I stick with the opinions of medical professionals, and not a single one has told me NOT to use sun screen because sun screen will cause cancer. No proof on that, so I will stick with it when I am outside exposed to the sun for longer than 30 minutes.
-
- July 22, 2016 at 3:22 pm
All those people who never used sun screen or poured oil on themselves and sat out in the sun because being tan in the 70s/80s was very in style, are now getting to an age where a cancer diagnosis is very likely, so there is a lot of melanoma happening because the times are catching up with people. As the new generations are becoming more aware of the damage sun will do to your skin, not just skin cancer but aging and not wanting to look 50 when you're 35, I believe we will see a decline in skin cancer in the future. But, that will be a while. Sorry I don't buy the whole "sun screen chemicals are killing me" theory. But, everyone is entitled to their opinion. I stick with the opinions of medical professionals, and not a single one has told me NOT to use sun screen because sun screen will cause cancer. No proof on that, so I will stick with it when I am outside exposed to the sun for longer than 30 minutes.
-
- July 22, 2016 at 5:59 pm
My theory is that for a long time, sunscreens weren't good at blocking UVA radiation, since UVB is burning, but both are damaging — if I am googling correctly. I think some still aren't good at blocking UVA, or are not as good as others. But the advent of sunscreens did allow people to spend more time in the sun without getting burnt. Which if true would result in a more damage by allowing people to get more UVA exposure without the burn, the main signal to get out of the sun. Just my pet theory.
-
- July 22, 2016 at 10:07 pm
I like that theory too.. makes sense. -
- July 22, 2016 at 10:07 pm
I like that theory too.. makes sense. -
- July 22, 2016 at 10:07 pm
I like that theory too.. makes sense. -
- July 23, 2016 at 3:54 pm
That's pretty spot on. To this day I wonder if it's still true. Sun burn tells us… Get inside dummy your fried. I think nature will always be smarter than us. I would be interested to see how many on this forum were tan addicts, never wore sun screen, spent weeks at the beach? I see these people and it seems they get wrinkles and the non melanoma skin cancers. It seems to me most people on here really didn't worship the sun or tanning beds.
-
- July 23, 2016 at 3:54 pm
That's pretty spot on. To this day I wonder if it's still true. Sun burn tells us… Get inside dummy your fried. I think nature will always be smarter than us. I would be interested to see how many on this forum were tan addicts, never wore sun screen, spent weeks at the beach? I see these people and it seems they get wrinkles and the non melanoma skin cancers. It seems to me most people on here really didn't worship the sun or tanning beds.
-
- July 23, 2016 at 3:54 pm
That's pretty spot on. To this day I wonder if it's still true. Sun burn tells us… Get inside dummy your fried. I think nature will always be smarter than us. I would be interested to see how many on this forum were tan addicts, never wore sun screen, spent weeks at the beach? I see these people and it seems they get wrinkles and the non melanoma skin cancers. It seems to me most people on here really didn't worship the sun or tanning beds.
-
- July 22, 2016 at 5:59 pm
My theory is that for a long time, sunscreens weren't good at blocking UVA radiation, since UVB is burning, but both are damaging — if I am googling correctly. I think some still aren't good at blocking UVA, or are not as good as others. But the advent of sunscreens did allow people to spend more time in the sun without getting burnt. Which if true would result in a more damage by allowing people to get more UVA exposure without the burn, the main signal to get out of the sun. Just my pet theory.
-
- July 22, 2016 at 5:59 pm
My theory is that for a long time, sunscreens weren't good at blocking UVA radiation, since UVB is burning, but both are damaging — if I am googling correctly. I think some still aren't good at blocking UVA, or are not as good as others. But the advent of sunscreens did allow people to spend more time in the sun without getting burnt. Which if true would result in a more damage by allowing people to get more UVA exposure without the burn, the main signal to get out of the sun. Just my pet theory.
-
- July 22, 2016 at 1:38 pm
Actually I read an article where melanoma has increased since the use of so much sunscreen has been told to so many. Perhaps all the chemicals you are baking in are the cause of this since everyone is pushing sunscreen and the chemical companies are making big bucks.
-
- July 22, 2016 at 1:38 pm
Actually I read an article where melanoma has increased since the use of so much sunscreen has been told to so many. Perhaps all the chemicals you are baking in are the cause of this since everyone is pushing sunscreen and the chemical companies are making big bucks.
-
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.