The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Help understanding pathology report

Forums General Melanoma Community Help understanding pathology report

  • This topic is empty.
  • Post
    Redbirdgirl
    Participant
      I had a couple moles removed and told I was lucky that it was pre melanoma but the doctor didn’t really explain my path report the first time and I had to have them go in deeper until the margins were clear. I was told that I would have to be vigilant and watched closely could anyone explain to me the path reports?

      A. Microscopic examination of the slides show an atypical melanocytic lesion with melanocytes in the epidermis and dermis consistent with a dysplastic junctional nevus. The margins of excision cannot be accessed with certainty.

      B. Microscopic examination of the slides show a limited specimen showing atypical proliferation of melanocytes in the dermis with junctional component highly consistent with a junctional dysplastic nevus. Recommended reexcision with negative margins

      Final Diagnosis
      A. Consistent with a dysplastic junctional nevus The margins cannot be accessed with certainty. Therefore, I recommend re excision with negative margins.

      B. dysplastic junctional nevus with positive margins Recommend re excision with negative margins

      Here is the path report from re excisions

      Sections consist of skin erosion, squamous hyperplasia, edema and mild chronic inflammation. Residual carcinoma or dysplasia is not identified in these sections. The margins are free of dysplasia/carcinoma.

      Final Diagnosis
      Residual dysplasia is not identified. Erosion, squamous hyperplasia, and mild chronic inflammation.

      Can anyone kind of explain to me what all this means in a more understanding way? I am having to see a dermatologist about more suspicious moles that are changing and suspicious on other parts of the body. The two biopsies before from the same leg.

    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
    About the MRF Patient Forum

    The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

    The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.