The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Help with biopsy report !..!

Forums General Melanoma Community Help with biopsy report !..!

  • Post
    ashlee12
    Participant

      So I've had my report for awhile I just now am looking at it again… I need some help with what this means….. It says 

       

       

      severely atypical lentiginous junctional melanocytic proliferation , favor Early evolving melanoma in situ (narrowly excised)

    Viewing 8 reply threads
    • Replies
        Janner
        Participant

          So basically, the two possible choices are severely atypical nevus or melanoma in situ.  There is not a distinct differentiation between the two, some docs might say "severely atypical", others like the path here say they favor melanoma in situ.  When they make a diagnosis, they evaluate MANY factors.  Some lesions may have features more/less atypical than others so it becomes a judgement call on which way to go.  This is why both severely atypical lesions and melanoma in situ are excised with the same 5mm margins – just in case.  So in your case, the diagnosis was melanoma in situ with narrow margins.  This means that you should have gone back and had the WLE to get wider margins.

          I'm not sure exactly what you were wanting for an answer….

          Janner
          Participant

            So basically, the two possible choices are severely atypical nevus or melanoma in situ.  There is not a distinct differentiation between the two, some docs might say "severely atypical", others like the path here say they favor melanoma in situ.  When they make a diagnosis, they evaluate MANY factors.  Some lesions may have features more/less atypical than others so it becomes a judgement call on which way to go.  This is why both severely atypical lesions and melanoma in situ are excised with the same 5mm margins – just in case.  So in your case, the diagnosis was melanoma in situ with narrow margins.  This means that you should have gone back and had the WLE to get wider margins.

            I'm not sure exactly what you were wanting for an answer….

            Janner
            Participant

              So basically, the two possible choices are severely atypical nevus or melanoma in situ.  There is not a distinct differentiation between the two, some docs might say "severely atypical", others like the path here say they favor melanoma in situ.  When they make a diagnosis, they evaluate MANY factors.  Some lesions may have features more/less atypical than others so it becomes a judgement call on which way to go.  This is why both severely atypical lesions and melanoma in situ are excised with the same 5mm margins – just in case.  So in your case, the diagnosis was melanoma in situ with narrow margins.  This means that you should have gone back and had the WLE to get wider margins.

              I'm not sure exactly what you were wanting for an answer….

              ashlee12
              Participant

                I guess I'm not sure what  type like was it superficial spreading or lentegnous melanoma or what kinda it doesn't say unless I'm missing it …. 

                ashlee12
                Participant

                  I guess I'm not sure what  type like was it superficial spreading or lentegnous melanoma or what kinda it doesn't say unless I'm missing it …. 

                    Janner
                    Participant

                      If it doesn't say which type, you'll have to ask.  Superficial spreading accounts for about 70% of all melanomas so it is most likely that type.  Lentigo maligna tends to be on sun exposed areas (head/arms) in older individuals.  Not a hard and fast rule, but the general norm.

                      Janner
                      Participant

                        If it doesn't say which type, you'll have to ask.  Superficial spreading accounts for about 70% of all melanomas so it is most likely that type.  Lentigo maligna tends to be on sun exposed areas (head/arms) in older individuals.  Not a hard and fast rule, but the general norm.

                        Janner
                        Participant

                          If it doesn't say which type, you'll have to ask.  Superficial spreading accounts for about 70% of all melanomas so it is most likely that type.  Lentigo maligna tends to be on sun exposed areas (head/arms) in older individuals.  Not a hard and fast rule, but the general norm.

                        ashlee12
                        Participant

                          I guess I'm not sure what  type like was it superficial spreading or lentegnous melanoma or what kinda it doesn't say unless I'm missing it …. 

                          ashlee12
                          Participant

                            Oh and janner I do have a question for you .. In my other post you said I have a 10% chance of seeing melanoma again.. Is that a 10% chance I'll develop a new primary or a 10% chance I'll have a reoccurrence?

                            ashlee12
                            Participant

                              Oh and janner I do have a question for you .. In my other post you said I have a 10% chance of seeing melanoma again.. Is that a 10% chance I'll develop a new primary or a 10% chance I'll have a reoccurrence?

                                Janner
                                Participant

                                  About an 8% chance you'll see another primary.  A recurrence from this in situ is extremely unlikely – probably less than a 1% chance if you had appropriate margins taken.

                                  Janner
                                  Participant

                                    About an 8% chance you'll see another primary.  A recurrence from this in situ is extremely unlikely – probably less than a 1% chance if you had appropriate margins taken.

                                    Janner
                                    Participant

                                      About an 8% chance you'll see another primary.  A recurrence from this in situ is extremely unlikely – probably less than a 1% chance if you had appropriate margins taken.

                                    ashlee12
                                    Participant

                                      Oh and janner I do have a question for you .. In my other post you said I have a 10% chance of seeing melanoma again.. Is that a 10% chance I'll develop a new primary or a 10% chance I'll have a reoccurrence?

                                  Viewing 8 reply threads
                                  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
                                  About the MRF Patient Forum

                                  The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                                  The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.