› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Help with biopsy report !..!
- This topic has 15 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 2 months ago by
Janner.
- Post
- Replies
-
-
- February 23, 2015 at 2:33 am
So basically, the two possible choices are severely atypical nevus or melanoma in situ. There is not a distinct differentiation between the two, some docs might say "severely atypical", others like the path here say they favor melanoma in situ. When they make a diagnosis, they evaluate MANY factors. Some lesions may have features more/less atypical than others so it becomes a judgement call on which way to go. This is why both severely atypical lesions and melanoma in situ are excised with the same 5mm margins – just in case. So in your case, the diagnosis was melanoma in situ with narrow margins. This means that you should have gone back and had the WLE to get wider margins.
I'm not sure exactly what you were wanting for an answer….
-
- February 23, 2015 at 2:33 am
So basically, the two possible choices are severely atypical nevus or melanoma in situ. There is not a distinct differentiation between the two, some docs might say "severely atypical", others like the path here say they favor melanoma in situ. When they make a diagnosis, they evaluate MANY factors. Some lesions may have features more/less atypical than others so it becomes a judgement call on which way to go. This is why both severely atypical lesions and melanoma in situ are excised with the same 5mm margins – just in case. So in your case, the diagnosis was melanoma in situ with narrow margins. This means that you should have gone back and had the WLE to get wider margins.
I'm not sure exactly what you were wanting for an answer….
-
- February 23, 2015 at 2:33 am
So basically, the two possible choices are severely atypical nevus or melanoma in situ. There is not a distinct differentiation between the two, some docs might say "severely atypical", others like the path here say they favor melanoma in situ. When they make a diagnosis, they evaluate MANY factors. Some lesions may have features more/less atypical than others so it becomes a judgement call on which way to go. This is why both severely atypical lesions and melanoma in situ are excised with the same 5mm margins – just in case. So in your case, the diagnosis was melanoma in situ with narrow margins. This means that you should have gone back and had the WLE to get wider margins.
I'm not sure exactly what you were wanting for an answer….
-
- February 23, 2015 at 2:38 am
I guess I'm not sure what type like was it superficial spreading or lentegnous melanoma or what kinda it doesn't say unless I'm missing it ….
-
- February 23, 2015 at 3:04 am
If it doesn't say which type, you'll have to ask. Superficial spreading accounts for about 70% of all melanomas so it is most likely that type. Lentigo maligna tends to be on sun exposed areas (head/arms) in older individuals. Not a hard and fast rule, but the general norm.
-
- February 23, 2015 at 3:04 am
If it doesn't say which type, you'll have to ask. Superficial spreading accounts for about 70% of all melanomas so it is most likely that type. Lentigo maligna tends to be on sun exposed areas (head/arms) in older individuals. Not a hard and fast rule, but the general norm.
-
- February 23, 2015 at 3:04 am
If it doesn't say which type, you'll have to ask. Superficial spreading accounts for about 70% of all melanomas so it is most likely that type. Lentigo maligna tends to be on sun exposed areas (head/arms) in older individuals. Not a hard and fast rule, but the general norm.
-
- February 23, 2015 at 3:00 am
Oh and janner I do have a question for you .. In my other post you said I have a 10% chance of seeing melanoma again.. Is that a 10% chance I'll develop a new primary or a 10% chance I'll have a reoccurrence?
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.