› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Path Report for Stage 1a – please help
- This topic has 18 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 10 months ago by
JC.
- Post
-
- November 17, 2013 at 3:24 pm
Hi, I have been reading this site for a few months.Being diagnosed has hit me extremely hard. I was diagnosed at 37 with a lesion on my back. I want to share my path report and hope some can help me make better sense of it.My Derm says this is extremely low risk, but in general its low risk to get….like 1 in 50 or so, so very small percentages don’t give me too much confidence.
Hist type: SSM
Max tumor thickness: 0.27mm
Anatomic Level: 2
Ulceration: not identified
Periphial margins: uninvolved by melanoma in the plane sectioning
Deep margins: uninvolved by melanoma
Mitotic index: 0/mm2
Microsatellitosis: not identified
Lymph-vascular invasion: not identified
Perin.Invasion- not identified
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes- present, non brisk
Tumor regression- not identifiedMicroscopic exam:
There is a circumscribed but asymmetrical compound melanocytic neoplasm, the epidermal component of which reveals focally markedly atypical epitheiloid melanocytes with abundant melanin throughout all epidermal layers. There is only a very focal invasion of the papillary dermis by few single and one small island of atypical melanocytes. There is a dense perivascular and nodular superficial lymphocytic infiltrate with numerous melanophages.
What do I make of this? Never makes note of growth phase. Also, is this saying that a large part of this was in situ?
Any and all help understanding this would really help. This has obsessed me to the point where it’s all I think about. I am married with 2 kids and want to be around for a while. Thanks in advance for replies!
- Replies
-
-
-
- November 17, 2013 at 8:05 pm
So what? What's wrong with posting the question here too and seeing some responses from different people who may not be on MIF? Is there a rule against posting the same question on different forums? How is that a helpful post to say "you were already answered on MIF?"
-
- November 17, 2013 at 8:05 pm
So what? What's wrong with posting the question here too and seeing some responses from different people who may not be on MIF? Is there a rule against posting the same question on different forums? How is that a helpful post to say "you were already answered on MIF?"
-
- November 17, 2013 at 8:05 pm
So what? What's wrong with posting the question here too and seeing some responses from different people who may not be on MIF? Is there a rule against posting the same question on different forums? How is that a helpful post to say "you were already answered on MIF?"
-
-
- November 17, 2013 at 8:59 pm
Hi, Tarheel-
The most important predictors of future recurrences are:
1) Breslow depth. Yours is 0.26 mm, similar to a melanoma in situ; many are > 1.0 mm and some are > 5.0 mm on diagnosis.
2) Mitotic index, which is the number of actively dividing cells in one microscope field. Yous is 0; many are 4-7 and some are >10.
3) Ulceration – meaning that the lesion has ruptured and melanoma cells may have escaped. Yours is not ulcerated.
Nobody can ever say that you will NEVER have a recurrence, but your chances could not be closer to 0.
As Janner (our melanoma guru) always says, remain vigilant but not obsessed. Practice good sun safety and teach your children sun safety. Check your skin regularly. If you see moles that change, consult your dermatologist. If you can do these things you should be fine. Congratulations on your lucky outcome!
Now I suggest that you go away and stop reading about melanoma on the Internet. You will just continue to scare yourself silly.
-
- November 17, 2013 at 8:59 pm
Hi, Tarheel-
The most important predictors of future recurrences are:
1) Breslow depth. Yours is 0.26 mm, similar to a melanoma in situ; many are > 1.0 mm and some are > 5.0 mm on diagnosis.
2) Mitotic index, which is the number of actively dividing cells in one microscope field. Yous is 0; many are 4-7 and some are >10.
3) Ulceration – meaning that the lesion has ruptured and melanoma cells may have escaped. Yours is not ulcerated.
Nobody can ever say that you will NEVER have a recurrence, but your chances could not be closer to 0.
As Janner (our melanoma guru) always says, remain vigilant but not obsessed. Practice good sun safety and teach your children sun safety. Check your skin regularly. If you see moles that change, consult your dermatologist. If you can do these things you should be fine. Congratulations on your lucky outcome!
Now I suggest that you go away and stop reading about melanoma on the Internet. You will just continue to scare yourself silly.
-
- November 17, 2013 at 8:59 pm
Hi, Tarheel-
The most important predictors of future recurrences are:
1) Breslow depth. Yours is 0.26 mm, similar to a melanoma in situ; many are > 1.0 mm and some are > 5.0 mm on diagnosis.
2) Mitotic index, which is the number of actively dividing cells in one microscope field. Yous is 0; many are 4-7 and some are >10.
3) Ulceration – meaning that the lesion has ruptured and melanoma cells may have escaped. Yours is not ulcerated.
Nobody can ever say that you will NEVER have a recurrence, but your chances could not be closer to 0.
As Janner (our melanoma guru) always says, remain vigilant but not obsessed. Practice good sun safety and teach your children sun safety. Check your skin regularly. If you see moles that change, consult your dermatologist. If you can do these things you should be fine. Congratulations on your lucky outcome!
Now I suggest that you go away and stop reading about melanoma on the Internet. You will just continue to scare yourself silly.
-
- November 18, 2013 at 2:44 am
Hi Tarheel,
What POW said is very true… you have a very favorable outcome after reading your path report. I understand its hard not to obsess about it but the thing is that nothing is ever 100% accurate and given the fact that it was caught VERY early…. I think your going to do just fine ๐
Samuel
-
- November 18, 2013 at 2:44 am
Hi Tarheel,
What POW said is very true… you have a very favorable outcome after reading your path report. I understand its hard not to obsess about it but the thing is that nothing is ever 100% accurate and given the fact that it was caught VERY early…. I think your going to do just fine ๐
Samuel
-
- November 18, 2013 at 2:44 am
Hi Tarheel,
What POW said is very true… you have a very favorable outcome after reading your path report. I understand its hard not to obsess about it but the thing is that nothing is ever 100% accurate and given the fact that it was caught VERY early…. I think your going to do just fine ๐
Samuel
-
- November 18, 2013 at 8:19 pm
-
- November 18, 2013 at 8:19 pm
-
- November 18, 2013 at 8:19 pm
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.