› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Recent PET
- This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 9 months ago by
scrapps.
- Post
-
- December 12, 2013 at 4:26 pm
So i do not frequently post, but I do come here to listen and learn rom all the other brave people figting this beast. In Aug of 2012 I had a WLE and SLN biopsy perfomred after discovering a 1.7mm ulcerated, nodular melanoma. One microscopic met in the SN. Had the CLND last October and decided on the peg interferon because I didn;t think I could do the wotch and wait. I made it through 3 self injections and couldn't rationalize the side effects for the minimal channnce it helps. Since then, we have been doing the "wait and watch" I have had 2 PET/CT scans, the first of which wass clean and had the second yesterday. Asmall hot spot was found in the muscle int he back of my left shoulder. My original mel and CLND was on the right. Doc said it was not a usual pattern for Mel, but we all know it doesn;t follow many patterns. The other confussing thing to all of us was that the area that lit up was not seen on the CT portion of the scan.Doc suggested an US and biopsy which I am trying to schedule. On my car ride back after the scans I started processing the info and remembered I had a tetanus booster last wed. in the back of my left arm. Has anyone heard of immunization sites showing increased uptake in a PET giving a false positive? The articles I found showed some false positives assocciated with the flu shot so I am holding out hope that is what it is.
Thanks for the help
Wil
- Replies
-
-
- December 12, 2013 at 5:03 pm
Yes, it absolutely could be from your immunization. PET scans just show places where there is a lot of metabolic activity. Any immunization (or infection, for that matter) is supposed to stimulate an immune response. The regional lymph nodes are likely to become very metabolically active for a while and show up positive on a PET scan. Then they should quiet down again in a couple of weeks.
-
- December 12, 2013 at 5:03 pm
Yes, it absolutely could be from your immunization. PET scans just show places where there is a lot of metabolic activity. Any immunization (or infection, for that matter) is supposed to stimulate an immune response. The regional lymph nodes are likely to become very metabolically active for a while and show up positive on a PET scan. Then they should quiet down again in a couple of weeks.
-
- December 12, 2013 at 6:03 pm
Thanks for the reply. That s what most info I could find said, but the hot spot wasn't in the regional nodes. It was in the muscle belly itself. I still think it could cause an inflamatory process there, just still the unknown is bothersome. Keeping a positive attitude though.
-
- December 12, 2013 at 6:03 pm
Thanks for the reply. That s what most info I could find said, but the hot spot wasn't in the regional nodes. It was in the muscle belly itself. I still think it could cause an inflamatory process there, just still the unknown is bothersome. Keeping a positive attitude though.
-
- December 12, 2013 at 6:03 pm
Thanks for the reply. That s what most info I could find said, but the hot spot wasn't in the regional nodes. It was in the muscle belly itself. I still think it could cause an inflamatory process there, just still the unknown is bothersome. Keeping a positive attitude though.
-
- December 12, 2013 at 5:03 pm
Yes, it absolutely could be from your immunization. PET scans just show places where there is a lot of metabolic activity. Any immunization (or infection, for that matter) is supposed to stimulate an immune response. The regional lymph nodes are likely to become very metabolically active for a while and show up positive on a PET scan. Then they should quiet down again in a couple of weeks.
-
Tagged: cutaneous melanoma
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.