› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Scan Schedule
- This topic has 12 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 1 month ago by
arthurjedi007.
- Post
-
- July 13, 2015 at 11:38 pm
I have Pet/CT on Wednesday. I must have forgot it was a Pet. For those familiar with my story, after I had surgery in January to remove the recurrence or whatever was left after ipi and IL-2 they did a Pet which was clear followed by a CT in April that was clear. Just not sure why another Pet so soon. Of course I'll ask. Think I was too excited last time to even think about it and now some serious scanxiety is setting in. As usual trying to rationalize everything going on in my head.
Josh
- Replies
-
-
- July 14, 2015 at 1:09 pm
Hi Josh, this might sound a little bit funny but I kind of like having scans. I like knowing what is going on with the melanoma inside my old body, or maybe it is just because I have had so many scans being part of a clinical trial. It could be that I have just got used to them as part of the routine. I am not sure why they are going for the Pet/Ct again vs just a Ct. Maybe your oncology team find them more informative than the regular CT scan. Wishing you go scan results!!!! Ed
-
- July 14, 2015 at 1:09 pm
Hi Josh, this might sound a little bit funny but I kind of like having scans. I like knowing what is going on with the melanoma inside my old body, or maybe it is just because I have had so many scans being part of a clinical trial. It could be that I have just got used to them as part of the routine. I am not sure why they are going for the Pet/Ct again vs just a Ct. Maybe your oncology team find them more informative than the regular CT scan. Wishing you go scan results!!!! Ed
-
- July 14, 2015 at 1:09 pm
Hi Josh, this might sound a little bit funny but I kind of like having scans. I like knowing what is going on with the melanoma inside my old body, or maybe it is just because I have had so many scans being part of a clinical trial. It could be that I have just got used to them as part of the routine. I am not sure why they are going for the Pet/Ct again vs just a Ct. Maybe your oncology team find them more informative than the regular CT scan. Wishing you go scan results!!!! Ed
-
- July 16, 2015 at 12:44 am
Hey Josh, I am right in line behind you, as I have a CT scheduled for Friday. This will be the first scan in about six months for me.
I hope you don't have to wait too long for your results, so that you don't have to endure too much more scanxiety.
I had a good conversation with my oncologist recently about PETs vs. CTs, and the plan we have come up with is to scan every 3 months alternating between PET and CT. I think the PET is better at finding new tumors and the vitality of existing ones, but the CT is better at resolving existing ones. Also, the PET has so much radiation (http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20100331/faq-radiation-risk-from-medical-imaging: "Getting a nuclear medicine study [sic: PET] exposes a patient to as much radiation as 10 to 2,050 chest X-rays") that it seems to make sense to limit them.
– Paul
-
- July 16, 2015 at 12:44 am
Hey Josh, I am right in line behind you, as I have a CT scheduled for Friday. This will be the first scan in about six months for me.
I hope you don't have to wait too long for your results, so that you don't have to endure too much more scanxiety.
I had a good conversation with my oncologist recently about PETs vs. CTs, and the plan we have come up with is to scan every 3 months alternating between PET and CT. I think the PET is better at finding new tumors and the vitality of existing ones, but the CT is better at resolving existing ones. Also, the PET has so much radiation (http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20100331/faq-radiation-risk-from-medical-imaging: "Getting a nuclear medicine study [sic: PET] exposes a patient to as much radiation as 10 to 2,050 chest X-rays") that it seems to make sense to limit them.
– Paul
-
- July 16, 2015 at 12:44 am
Hey Josh, I am right in line behind you, as I have a CT scheduled for Friday. This will be the first scan in about six months for me.
I hope you don't have to wait too long for your results, so that you don't have to endure too much more scanxiety.
I had a good conversation with my oncologist recently about PETs vs. CTs, and the plan we have come up with is to scan every 3 months alternating between PET and CT. I think the PET is better at finding new tumors and the vitality of existing ones, but the CT is better at resolving existing ones. Also, the PET has so much radiation (http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20100331/faq-radiation-risk-from-medical-imaging: "Getting a nuclear medicine study [sic: PET] exposes a patient to as much radiation as 10 to 2,050 chest X-rays") that it seems to make sense to limit them.
– Paul
-
- July 16, 2015 at 3:42 pm
Hope your scan went well and you get the results you are wanting.
Artie
-
- July 16, 2015 at 3:42 pm
Hope your scan went well and you get the results you are wanting.
Artie
-
- July 16, 2015 at 3:42 pm
Hope your scan went well and you get the results you are wanting.
Artie
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.