The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

Sun Damage Causes Newly Discovered Melanoma-Driving Genetic Changes

Forums Cutaneous Melanoma Community Sun Damage Causes Newly Discovered Melanoma-Driving Genetic Changes

  • Post
    LynnLuc
    Participant

       

       

      Melanoma researchers have been struggling with this question: Which mutations drive this cancer that lead to ultraviolet (UV)-induced genetic damage in tumor cells caused by sunlight exposure?

      There have yet to be any mutations conclusively tied to melanoma. The great quantity of these passenger mutations has pulled away from the search for genetic driver mutations that are most important in melanoma development and progression.

      Scientists at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center created a method to mark the drivers while amongst a great amount of passengers. They then found 6 genes with driving mutations in melanoma, three having damage inflicted by UV light which causes recurrent 'hotspot' mutations. The research can be found in the July 20 issue of the journal Cell.

      Co-senior author Lynda Chin, M.D., Professor and Chair of MD Anderson's Department of Genomic Medicine, explained:

       

      "Those three mutations are the first 'smoking gun' genomic evidence directly linking damage from UV light to melanoma. Until now, that link has been based on epidemiological evidence and experimental data."

      "This study also is exciting because many of the recent large-scale genomic studies have not discovered new cancer genes with recurrent hot-spot mutations, a pattern strongly indicative of biological importance," added Chin, who also is scientific director of MD Anderson's Institute for Applied Cancer Science.

      According to the researchers, each of the six new melanoma genes they identified are all significantly mutated and provide possible targets for new treatments.

      Thousands of Potential Mutations Recognized, Only Need A Few Dozen Significant Ones

      There had previously been a great deal of important mutations recognized as melanoma drivers, but they were falsely identified because the majority of these mutations do not seem to be caused by direct damage from UV light, including:

      • BRAF (V600)- present in half of all melanomas
      • NRAS (Q61)

      Although those known mutations are valuable, there is still missing information. Compared with other types of solid tumors, Melanoma has higher genetic mutation rates. Most are attributable to passenger mutations resulting from damage by UV light, resulting in a DNA alteration called a cytidine (C) to thymidine (T) transition.

      Chin, along with Levi A. Garraway M.D., Ph.D., associate professor at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, and senior associate member at the Broad Institute, used 121 melanoma samples paired with normal DNA and sequenced the exons (active portions of DNA that are involved in protein synthesis). The experts found 86,813 coding mutations. The consequential mutation rate was larger than in any other tumor type reported.

      http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/248105.php?sv=d
       

    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Replies
        bcl
        Participant

          Very interesting, thanks.

           

          more reading…

           

           

          http://www.sciencecodex.com/new_findings_by_gw_researcher_break_tanning_misconceptions_there_is_no_such_thing_as_a_safe_tan-95394

          No such thing as a safe tan, says study

          Posted On: July 23, 2012 – 5:30pm

           

          "This is the first time that UV-induced melanin formation (tanning), traditionally thought to protect against skin cancer, is shown to be directly involved in melanoma formation in mammals," said De Fabo, who is professor emeritus at SMHS. "Skin melanoma is the most lethal of the skin cancers. Our study shows that we were able to discover this new role for melanin by cleanly separating UVA from UVB and exposing our experimental melanoma animal model with these separated wavebands using our unique UV light system designed and set up at GW. Dermatologists have been warning for years there is no such thing as a safe tan and this new data appears to confirm this."

           cont..

           

          (filter is blocking this post for some reason..)

          bcl
          Participant

            Very interesting, thanks.

             

            more reading…

             

             

            http://www.sciencecodex.com/new_findings_by_gw_researcher_break_tanning_misconceptions_there_is_no_such_thing_as_a_safe_tan-95394

            No such thing as a safe tan, says study

            Posted On: July 23, 2012 – 5:30pm

             

            "This is the first time that UV-induced melanin formation (tanning), traditionally thought to protect against skin cancer, is shown to be directly involved in melanoma formation in mammals," said De Fabo, who is professor emeritus at SMHS. "Skin melanoma is the most lethal of the skin cancers. Our study shows that we were able to discover this new role for melanin by cleanly separating UVA from UVB and exposing our experimental melanoma animal model with these separated wavebands using our unique UV light system designed and set up at GW. Dermatologists have been warning for years there is no such thing as a safe tan and this new data appears to confirm this."

             cont..

             

            (filter is blocking this post for some reason..)

            bcl
            Participant

              Very interesting, thanks.

               

              more reading…

               

               

              http://www.sciencecodex.com/new_findings_by_gw_researcher_break_tanning_misconceptions_there_is_no_such_thing_as_a_safe_tan-95394

              No such thing as a safe tan, says study

              Posted On: July 23, 2012 – 5:30pm

               

              "This is the first time that UV-induced melanin formation (tanning), traditionally thought to protect against skin cancer, is shown to be directly involved in melanoma formation in mammals," said De Fabo, who is professor emeritus at SMHS. "Skin melanoma is the most lethal of the skin cancers. Our study shows that we were able to discover this new role for melanin by cleanly separating UVA from UVB and exposing our experimental melanoma animal model with these separated wavebands using our unique UV light system designed and set up at GW. Dermatologists have been warning for years there is no such thing as a safe tan and this new data appears to confirm this."

               cont..

               

              (filter is blocking this post for some reason..)

          Viewing 2 reply threads
          • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
          About the MRF Patient Forum

          The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

          The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.

          Popular Topics