› Forums › General Melanoma Community › Trying to understand?
- This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by
dian in spokane.
- Post
-
- November 21, 2011 at 12:28 pm
I am new to the group and I was just diagnosed with Stage 1 (.35) melanoma. I have been trying to do some reseach so I can better understand my diagnosis. I am going to do a profile once I find my dang path report from the move. My dermatologist kept reiterating to me, "Stage I is a good place to be, you have a 95 % survival rate." Well, when I did my own research, he was right, the five year survival rate is 95%, but then the 10 year survival rate drops to 88%! I think that is scary. So what do I do? Just wait around for it to come back? Do I need to see an oncologist?
I am new to the group and I was just diagnosed with Stage 1 (.35) melanoma. I have been trying to do some reseach so I can better understand my diagnosis. I am going to do a profile once I find my dang path report from the move. My dermatologist kept reiterating to me, "Stage I is a good place to be, you have a 95 % survival rate." Well, when I did my own research, he was right, the five year survival rate is 95%, but then the 10 year survival rate drops to 88%! I think that is scary. So what do I do? Just wait around for it to come back? Do I need to see an oncologist?
- Replies
-
-
- November 21, 2011 at 2:19 pm
Hi,
I had a 0.35 mm melanoma removed last year and so like you am a stage 1er. As your dermatologist said, it is a good place to be, although, after the shock of a cancer diagnosis it may not feel like it is – I know it did not feel like that to me at first. On survival statisticsm you need to remember that are just a historical study of a particular group and while they can give you an indication of the seriousness of the diagnosis there are many factors involved and so are not necessarily directly applicable to you; for instance our lesions were caught while they were very thin. I would not get too hung up about statistics. I know that is easier said than done.
Going forward it is important to be vigilant. I had differing advice on how I should follow up; the minimal being an annual dermatological check-up. I’ve been more proactive and see a melanoma specialist every six months (three months in first year) and have had my skin photographed to help identify changes in moles. This works for me but everyone is different and you should do whatever makes you most sense for you.
Take care,
Robert
-
- November 21, 2011 at 2:19 pm
Hi,
I had a 0.35 mm melanoma removed last year and so like you am a stage 1er. As your dermatologist said, it is a good place to be, although, after the shock of a cancer diagnosis it may not feel like it is – I know it did not feel like that to me at first. On survival statisticsm you need to remember that are just a historical study of a particular group and while they can give you an indication of the seriousness of the diagnosis there are many factors involved and so are not necessarily directly applicable to you; for instance our lesions were caught while they were very thin. I would not get too hung up about statistics. I know that is easier said than done.
Going forward it is important to be vigilant. I had differing advice on how I should follow up; the minimal being an annual dermatological check-up. I’ve been more proactive and see a melanoma specialist every six months (three months in first year) and have had my skin photographed to help identify changes in moles. This works for me but everyone is different and you should do whatever makes you most sense for you.
Take care,
Robert
-
- November 21, 2011 at 2:19 pm
Hi,
I had a 0.35 mm melanoma removed last year and so like you am a stage 1er. As your dermatologist said, it is a good place to be, although, after the shock of a cancer diagnosis it may not feel like it is – I know it did not feel like that to me at first. On survival statisticsm you need to remember that are just a historical study of a particular group and while they can give you an indication of the seriousness of the diagnosis there are many factors involved and so are not necessarily directly applicable to you; for instance our lesions were caught while they were very thin. I would not get too hung up about statistics. I know that is easier said than done.
Going forward it is important to be vigilant. I had differing advice on how I should follow up; the minimal being an annual dermatological check-up. I’ve been more proactive and see a melanoma specialist every six months (three months in first year) and have had my skin photographed to help identify changes in moles. This works for me but everyone is different and you should do whatever makes you most sense for you.
Take care,
Robert
-
- November 22, 2011 at 2:19 am
Statistics project outcomes for groups, not individuals. You are an individual.
No, you do not need to see an oncologist, and no, you will not just 'wait around for it to come back' There are a lot of proven ways to increase your odds against cancer and heart disease.
See your family doctor for a yearly physical
See your dermatologist for regular skin checks. Biopsy suspicious spots if they change or you feel they need to be removed.
Don't smoke.
Exercise moderately
Eat a lot of fresh, colorful vegetables,
Maintain a healthy weight and lifestyle.
Avoid sun damage.
You might also try:
vitamin D supplementation and turmeric supplements. And if you are into it, there are a thousand anti cancer diets out there.
I'd also recommend, laughter, taking up a hobby (if you don't already have one) that includes music, art..some way to express your inner artist and fill your life with joy. Joy kills sorrow. raises endorphins, and empowers the immune system.
Don't get caught up in those statistics. Then mean nothing really, in terms of you live your life and face your disease. Screw statistics.
dian
-
- November 22, 2011 at 2:19 am
Statistics project outcomes for groups, not individuals. You are an individual.
No, you do not need to see an oncologist, and no, you will not just 'wait around for it to come back' There are a lot of proven ways to increase your odds against cancer and heart disease.
See your family doctor for a yearly physical
See your dermatologist for regular skin checks. Biopsy suspicious spots if they change or you feel they need to be removed.
Don't smoke.
Exercise moderately
Eat a lot of fresh, colorful vegetables,
Maintain a healthy weight and lifestyle.
Avoid sun damage.
You might also try:
vitamin D supplementation and turmeric supplements. And if you are into it, there are a thousand anti cancer diets out there.
I'd also recommend, laughter, taking up a hobby (if you don't already have one) that includes music, art..some way to express your inner artist and fill your life with joy. Joy kills sorrow. raises endorphins, and empowers the immune system.
Don't get caught up in those statistics. Then mean nothing really, in terms of you live your life and face your disease. Screw statistics.
dian
-
- November 22, 2011 at 2:19 am
Statistics project outcomes for groups, not individuals. You are an individual.
No, you do not need to see an oncologist, and no, you will not just 'wait around for it to come back' There are a lot of proven ways to increase your odds against cancer and heart disease.
See your family doctor for a yearly physical
See your dermatologist for regular skin checks. Biopsy suspicious spots if they change or you feel they need to be removed.
Don't smoke.
Exercise moderately
Eat a lot of fresh, colorful vegetables,
Maintain a healthy weight and lifestyle.
Avoid sun damage.
You might also try:
vitamin D supplementation and turmeric supplements. And if you are into it, there are a thousand anti cancer diets out there.
I'd also recommend, laughter, taking up a hobby (if you don't already have one) that includes music, art..some way to express your inner artist and fill your life with joy. Joy kills sorrow. raises endorphins, and empowers the immune system.
Don't get caught up in those statistics. Then mean nothing really, in terms of you live your life and face your disease. Screw statistics.
dian
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.