mizmena
REGISTER
The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Content within the patient forum is user-generated and has not been reviewed by medical professionals. Other sections of the Melanoma Research Foundation website include information that has been reviewed by medical professionals as appropriate. All medical decisions should be made in consultation with your doctor or other qualified medical professional.

mizmena

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Replies
      • March 23, 2015 at 9:33 pm
      mizmena
      Participant
        Final Dermatopathology Report
           
           
        Final Pathologic Diagnosis
           
        SKIN, RIGHT CLAVICLE (BIOPSY): INTRADERMAL MELANOMA. THE TUMOR IS TRANSECTED AT THE DEEP SECTION EDGE. (SEE COMMENT).
           
        Comment
           
        Multiple levels of recut sections have been examined. The sections show a shave biopsy of skin to the level of the mid reticular dermis. The epidermis exhibits atrophy. Intraepidermal tumor is not identified. Within the dermis are large, discrete nodules of tumor displaying prominent epithelioid morphologic features with moderate to marked nuclear pleomorphism and focally prominent nucleoli. The tumor measures at least 2.8 mm from the granular layer of the epidermis. Numerous mitotic figures are present in the neoplastic cells (14 per millimeter squared). A moderate to focally dense lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory infiltrate is admixed within and surrounding the tumor nodules. Immunohistochemistry for S-100 protein and Melan-A is diffusely positive in the tumor cells and staining for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) is negative in the neoplastic cells. The tumor is transected at the deep section edge.
           
        The histopathologic findings show nodules of melanoma diffusely involving the dermis. The differential diagnosis includes primary nodular melanoma, primary dermal melanoma and metastatic melanoma requiring close correlation with the clinical history, clinical presentation and results of imaging studies for distinction. If the tumor is determined to represent a primary melanoma, the following histopathologic parameters apply:
        Breslow thickness = at least 2.8 mm
        Clark level = at least IV
        Ulceration: absent
        Regression: Present
        Mitoses: 14 per millimeter squared
        Angiolymphatic invasion: absent
        Perineural invasion: absent
        Microscopic satellites: absent
        Pathologic stage: at least pT3a
           
        In view of transection of the tumor at the deep section edge, the Breslow thickness and Clark level may require revision pending examination of the excision specimen.
           
        Close correlation is essential to determine rather this represents a primary or metastatic melanoma.
           
        In addition, given the clinical history of recent onset vitiligo and prominent inflammatory response to the tumor, the depigmented areas may represent melanoma-associated vitiligo.
           
        The case was discussed with Dr. Rice on 3/17/15.
           
           
        mplclx
        Electronically Signed by Douglas C. Parker, M.D.
           
        3/18/2015 15:49
           
           
           
           
           
        Clinical History
        Right clavicle. BCC. Biopsy shave. No personal/family history of NMSC/MM.
           
        Specimen(s) Received
        A: Right clavicle
           
        Gross Description
        The specimen is received in formalin and is labeled “right clavicle .” The specimen consists of an ovoid pink-tan skin shave excision measuring 1.6 x 1.3 x 0.5cm. The specimen is trisected and submitted entirely in cassette A1.
           
           
        mplsmp/3/13/2015
           
           
        Microscopic Description
           
        Microscopic examination performed.
           
           
        • March 23, 2015 at 9:33 pm
        mizmena
        Participant
          Final Dermatopathology Report
             
             
          Final Pathologic Diagnosis
             
          SKIN, RIGHT CLAVICLE (BIOPSY): INTRADERMAL MELANOMA. THE TUMOR IS TRANSECTED AT THE DEEP SECTION EDGE. (SEE COMMENT).
             
          Comment
             
          Multiple levels of recut sections have been examined. The sections show a shave biopsy of skin to the level of the mid reticular dermis. The epidermis exhibits atrophy. Intraepidermal tumor is not identified. Within the dermis are large, discrete nodules of tumor displaying prominent epithelioid morphologic features with moderate to marked nuclear pleomorphism and focally prominent nucleoli. The tumor measures at least 2.8 mm from the granular layer of the epidermis. Numerous mitotic figures are present in the neoplastic cells (14 per millimeter squared). A moderate to focally dense lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory infiltrate is admixed within and surrounding the tumor nodules. Immunohistochemistry for S-100 protein and Melan-A is diffusely positive in the tumor cells and staining for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) is negative in the neoplastic cells. The tumor is transected at the deep section edge.
             
          The histopathologic findings show nodules of melanoma diffusely involving the dermis. The differential diagnosis includes primary nodular melanoma, primary dermal melanoma and metastatic melanoma requiring close correlation with the clinical history, clinical presentation and results of imaging studies for distinction. If the tumor is determined to represent a primary melanoma, the following histopathologic parameters apply:
          Breslow thickness = at least 2.8 mm
          Clark level = at least IV
          Ulceration: absent
          Regression: Present
          Mitoses: 14 per millimeter squared
          Angiolymphatic invasion: absent
          Perineural invasion: absent
          Microscopic satellites: absent
          Pathologic stage: at least pT3a
             
          In view of transection of the tumor at the deep section edge, the Breslow thickness and Clark level may require revision pending examination of the excision specimen.
             
          Close correlation is essential to determine rather this represents a primary or metastatic melanoma.
             
          In addition, given the clinical history of recent onset vitiligo and prominent inflammatory response to the tumor, the depigmented areas may represent melanoma-associated vitiligo.
             
          The case was discussed with Dr. Rice on 3/17/15.
             
             
          mplclx
          Electronically Signed by Douglas C. Parker, M.D.
             
          3/18/2015 15:49
             
             
             
             
             
          Clinical History
          Right clavicle. BCC. Biopsy shave. No personal/family history of NMSC/MM.
             
          Specimen(s) Received
          A: Right clavicle
             
          Gross Description
          The specimen is received in formalin and is labeled “right clavicle .” The specimen consists of an ovoid pink-tan skin shave excision measuring 1.6 x 1.3 x 0.5cm. The specimen is trisected and submitted entirely in cassette A1.
             
             
          mplsmp/3/13/2015
             
             
          Microscopic Description
             
          Microscopic examination performed.
             
             
          • March 23, 2015 at 9:33 pm
          mizmena
          Participant
            Final Dermatopathology Report
               
               
            Final Pathologic Diagnosis
               
            SKIN, RIGHT CLAVICLE (BIOPSY): INTRADERMAL MELANOMA. THE TUMOR IS TRANSECTED AT THE DEEP SECTION EDGE. (SEE COMMENT).
               
            Comment
               
            Multiple levels of recut sections have been examined. The sections show a shave biopsy of skin to the level of the mid reticular dermis. The epidermis exhibits atrophy. Intraepidermal tumor is not identified. Within the dermis are large, discrete nodules of tumor displaying prominent epithelioid morphologic features with moderate to marked nuclear pleomorphism and focally prominent nucleoli. The tumor measures at least 2.8 mm from the granular layer of the epidermis. Numerous mitotic figures are present in the neoplastic cells (14 per millimeter squared). A moderate to focally dense lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory infiltrate is admixed within and surrounding the tumor nodules. Immunohistochemistry for S-100 protein and Melan-A is diffusely positive in the tumor cells and staining for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) is negative in the neoplastic cells. The tumor is transected at the deep section edge.
               
            The histopathologic findings show nodules of melanoma diffusely involving the dermis. The differential diagnosis includes primary nodular melanoma, primary dermal melanoma and metastatic melanoma requiring close correlation with the clinical history, clinical presentation and results of imaging studies for distinction. If the tumor is determined to represent a primary melanoma, the following histopathologic parameters apply:
            Breslow thickness = at least 2.8 mm
            Clark level = at least IV
            Ulceration: absent
            Regression: Present
            Mitoses: 14 per millimeter squared
            Angiolymphatic invasion: absent
            Perineural invasion: absent
            Microscopic satellites: absent
            Pathologic stage: at least pT3a
               
            In view of transection of the tumor at the deep section edge, the Breslow thickness and Clark level may require revision pending examination of the excision specimen.
               
            Close correlation is essential to determine rather this represents a primary or metastatic melanoma.
               
            In addition, given the clinical history of recent onset vitiligo and prominent inflammatory response to the tumor, the depigmented areas may represent melanoma-associated vitiligo.
               
            The case was discussed with Dr. Rice on 3/17/15.
               
               
            mplclx
            Electronically Signed by Douglas C. Parker, M.D.
               
            3/18/2015 15:49
               
               
               
               
               
            Clinical History
            Right clavicle. BCC. Biopsy shave. No personal/family history of NMSC/MM.
               
            Specimen(s) Received
            A: Right clavicle
               
            Gross Description
            The specimen is received in formalin and is labeled “right clavicle .” The specimen consists of an ovoid pink-tan skin shave excision measuring 1.6 x 1.3 x 0.5cm. The specimen is trisected and submitted entirely in cassette A1.
               
               
            mplsmp/3/13/2015
               
               
            Microscopic Description
               
            Microscopic examination performed.
               
               
            • March 25, 2015 at 1:38 pm
            mizmena
            Participant

              Thank you so much. I am scheduled for my Scans on April 6 and my first consultation w/ the doctors the following day..these next 12 days are gonna be horrendous for me. I am already showing an abnormal lymph node so yes its very much possible its metastatic which makes me even more nervous. Praying it hasnt traveled farther. I am def preparing my mind for the worse as with any situation. I am def glad that i found this forum it will come as much needed relief with all the questions that are soon to follow. I am also confident in Emory's team. I have already researched the two oncologist i will be meeting with. They seem to be okay. I believe i will be satisfied w/ the level of care they are going to provide me. 

              🙂 thanks again.

              • March 25, 2015 at 1:38 pm
              mizmena
              Participant

                Thank you so much. I am scheduled for my Scans on April 6 and my first consultation w/ the doctors the following day..these next 12 days are gonna be horrendous for me. I am already showing an abnormal lymph node so yes its very much possible its metastatic which makes me even more nervous. Praying it hasnt traveled farther. I am def preparing my mind for the worse as with any situation. I am def glad that i found this forum it will come as much needed relief with all the questions that are soon to follow. I am also confident in Emory's team. I have already researched the two oncologist i will be meeting with. They seem to be okay. I believe i will be satisfied w/ the level of care they are going to provide me. 

                🙂 thanks again.

                • March 25, 2015 at 1:38 pm
                mizmena
                Participant

                  Thank you so much. I am scheduled for my Scans on April 6 and my first consultation w/ the doctors the following day..these next 12 days are gonna be horrendous for me. I am already showing an abnormal lymph node so yes its very much possible its metastatic which makes me even more nervous. Praying it hasnt traveled farther. I am def preparing my mind for the worse as with any situation. I am def glad that i found this forum it will come as much needed relief with all the questions that are soon to follow. I am also confident in Emory's team. I have already researched the two oncologist i will be meeting with. They seem to be okay. I believe i will be satisfied w/ the level of care they are going to provide me. 

                  🙂 thanks again.

                  • March 24, 2015 at 4:52 pm
                  mizmena
                  Participant

                    Thank you so much!! I have Pet Scan and MRI scheduled for April 6, I am assuming this is to make sure if it has spread to other areas or not. Patiently awaiting the biopsy of the lymph node results. It was scheudled before the actual lesion biopsy came back because i was complaining of a painful swollen node to my primary care doc and when they did the ultrasound they noticed and abnormality, then two days later the biopsy came back of the lesion positive for melanoma. So rather than me canceling the biopsy since it was scheduled for the next day we moved forward with it.

                    I have been speaking w/ the melanoma coordinator at WINSHIP Emory and she has been nice, but not very informative. So my emotions are all over the place. Then getting the path report is like an alien language. 

                    Thank you so much for taking the time to help me understand. I am sure as the time passes i will have tons of questions.

                     

                    • March 24, 2015 at 4:52 pm
                    mizmena
                    Participant

                      Thank you so much!! I have Pet Scan and MRI scheduled for April 6, I am assuming this is to make sure if it has spread to other areas or not. Patiently awaiting the biopsy of the lymph node results. It was scheudled before the actual lesion biopsy came back because i was complaining of a painful swollen node to my primary care doc and when they did the ultrasound they noticed and abnormality, then two days later the biopsy came back of the lesion positive for melanoma. So rather than me canceling the biopsy since it was scheduled for the next day we moved forward with it.

                      I have been speaking w/ the melanoma coordinator at WINSHIP Emory and she has been nice, but not very informative. So my emotions are all over the place. Then getting the path report is like an alien language. 

                      Thank you so much for taking the time to help me understand. I am sure as the time passes i will have tons of questions.

                       

                      • March 24, 2015 at 4:52 pm
                      mizmena
                      Participant

                        Thank you so much!! I have Pet Scan and MRI scheduled for April 6, I am assuming this is to make sure if it has spread to other areas or not. Patiently awaiting the biopsy of the lymph node results. It was scheudled before the actual lesion biopsy came back because i was complaining of a painful swollen node to my primary care doc and when they did the ultrasound they noticed and abnormality, then two days later the biopsy came back of the lesion positive for melanoma. So rather than me canceling the biopsy since it was scheduled for the next day we moved forward with it.

                        I have been speaking w/ the melanoma coordinator at WINSHIP Emory and she has been nice, but not very informative. So my emotions are all over the place. Then getting the path report is like an alien language. 

                        Thank you so much for taking the time to help me understand. I am sure as the time passes i will have tons of questions.

                         

                    Viewing 2 reply threads
                    About the MRF Patient Forum

                    The MRF Patient Forum is the oldest and largest online community of people affected by melanoma. It is designed to provide peer support and information to caregivers, patients, family and friends. There is no better place to discuss different parts of your journey with this cancer and find the friends and support resources to make that journey more bearable.

                    The information on the forum is open and accessible to everyone. To add a new topic or to post a reply, you must be a registered user. Please note that you will be able to post both topics and replies anonymously even though you are logged in. All posts must abide by MRF posting policies.